Key Intelligence Questions for FY 1974

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040032-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 28, 1998
Sequence Number: 
32
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 9, 1974
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040032-6.pdf103.13 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/09/03 f . 4B00506R000100040032-6 N1\.R 1974 OCI/IC 74-0972 The Chairman and 'ienbers, Nationa Council "Intelligence Cc ^snittee xnte:Llience Security 'or Ti" "1974 Reference is my 'Letter of 9 January 1974, subject above, which forwarded a cony of the "Key Intelligence Questions (KI s)" and cc nted on the inputs which had been received from. each NS>CIC nber. I noted in the letter that the KTQs ld be considered at an early NSs IC meeting. 2. Since it now appears that the Chairman preclude holding, an ` SCIC ,meting. I am writing individual co urrence an c+ tents of each me ber the } I11s. 3. As the fiscal year was more than half over before the key questions had been c+ ile:.i, I considered it necessary to start the evaluation process as soon as -possible. The USTIR encies already have been tasked to respond to selected ?'IQs a test of the system. This really represents a :'shakedow a cruise" on a program which I :gym hopeful will provide a Food management tool for measurin the effectiveness with Which the Intelligence Cor sunity rends to intelligence topics identified as being of ? j or current importance to policy levels of t". Gover ent . !,Nat I an soaking, as you are were, is a better nka.e between the substantive functions of intelligence and the allocation of resources. Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : 4B00506R000100040 MpDET CL 13Y.aTY1?~ Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : 4B00506R000100040032-6 4. During the summer, we will review the "Key Intelligence Questions" and develop a revrised list for FY 1975. By that time, our evaluation process should provide a basis both for improving the statement of questions and for evaluating the Cernrnunity re- sponses. Any co ments you may have as to the kinds of questions on which to focus in the next iteration would be most apppr. eciated. W. E. Colby 25X1A9a ICI/IC/CS _ ho 6 Mar 74 Distribution: Orig.- Chairmen NSCIC 1 - Dep Sec. State 1 - DepS~ec. Defense l.- Chairman JCS I - Under Sec. Treausxy I ICI l - DDC! I - ER 1 - D/DCI/IC 6 IC Registry - CS subject (NSCIC file) 1 - CS chrono 25X1A9a i _- chrono / - eQP Approved For Release 2000/09/03 : CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040032-6