(UNTITLED)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040056-0
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 31, 2003
Sequence Number:
56
Case Number:
Publication Date:
December 19, 1973
Content Type:
NOTES
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 25.09 KB |
Body:
Approved For ase 2004/01/20 : CIA-RDP84B00506000100040056-0
DRAFT
OGC: JSWarner: s in
19 December 1973
In your letter you also state~itThere has never been a prose-
cution for violation of ?798, transmitting classified information
relating to codes and communications intelligence. " I am aware
of one case, United States v. Petersen, wherein Petersen, an
employee of the National Security Agency, was indicted under three
counts: (1) 18 U. S. C. 793, (2) 18 U. S. C. 798, and (3) 18 U. S. C. 2071.
On 22 December 1954 Petersen entered a plea of guilty to count (2)
of the indictment. One of the reasons for my mentioning this is
that 95798 is considered a tougher statute in that prosecution seems
somewhat less difficult than under the other statutes. This undoubtedly
was a factor in his attorney, a former NSA employee, urging him to
plead under ?798 rather than. going to trial on all three.
Approved For Release 2004/01/20 : CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040056-0