(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040056-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 31, 2003
Sequence Number: 
56
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 19, 1973
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040056-0.pdf25.09 KB
Body: 
Approved For ase 2004/01/20 : CIA-RDP84B00506000100040056-0 DRAFT OGC: JSWarner: s in 19 December 1973 In your letter you also state~itThere has never been a prose- cution for violation of ?798, transmitting classified information relating to codes and communications intelligence. " I am aware of one case, United States v. Petersen, wherein Petersen, an employee of the National Security Agency, was indicted under three counts: (1) 18 U. S. C. 793, (2) 18 U. S. C. 798, and (3) 18 U. S. C. 2071. On 22 December 1954 Petersen entered a plea of guilty to count (2) of the indictment. One of the reasons for my mentioning this is that 95798 is considered a tougher statute in that prosecution seems somewhat less difficult than under the other statutes. This undoubtedly was a factor in his attorney, a former NSA employee, urging him to plead under ?798 rather than. going to trial on all three. Approved For Release 2004/01/20 : CIA-RDP84B00506R000100040056-0