LETTER TO B. R. INMAN FROM EDWARD P. BOLAND

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84M00127R000100040007-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 13, 2007
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 6, 1982
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84M00127R000100040007-7.pdf80.23 KB
Body: 
EOWARf~w,F~C3,~-+ANO, MASS.. _ yY 1 J. ZASLOCK1. WIS. CHA ROSE N.C. ROMANO L. MAZZOU. KY. NORMAN \).IINETA. CALIF. WYCHE FOWLER. JR.. GA. LEE H. HAMILTON, IND. ALBERT GORE. JR., TENN. SOH e+rUMP. ARIZ. J. K-SNETH ROSINSON. VA. JOHN M. ASHSROOK. OHIO RO3EXr MCCLORY. ILL. G. WILLIAM WHITEHURST, VA. C. W. SILL YOUNG. FLA. Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP84M00127R000100040007-7 Room H-405. US. CAPITOL (202) 223-41Z1 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 THOMAS K. LATIMER. STAFP.OIRECTOR MICHAZ J. O'NEIL. CHIEF COUNSEL PATR;CIC G. LONG. ASSOCIATE COUNSEL April 6, 1982 Admiral B. R. Inman Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D. C. 20505 Dear Admiral Inman: Thank you for your recent letter concerning questions that have been asked in the course of the Subcommittee on Program and Budget Authorization's consideration of the FY 83 NFTP budget request. I believe some misunderstanding may have arisen about this matter. Either Mr. Robinson or I asked nearly every NFIP and TIARA program manager who appeared before the Subcommittee this year the question to which you allude. Every program manager who was asked responded to the question. I appreciate your bringing this issue to my attention because I had been unaware that one of those responses may not have been complete. I appreciate your candor because I disagree that the information which the -Subcommittee sought was of little value. In matters involving the public purse, Presidential priorities are of the utmost importance. So, too, are those which may have been developed in other fora. The Subcommittee's responsibility - which I believe it has exercised fairly and thoroughly - is to evaluate all such preferences and to make its own judgment of what is in the nation's interest. I believe, in other words, that the Subcommittee is capable of weighing the relevance of the subject matter in question. Your.letter seems to distinguish between the Committee's staff and the Committee. I receive the impression that you believe that the staff sometimes .acts for a purpose of its own, not for that of the Committee. That is not the case. Since the inception of the Committee, I have paid great attention to the selection- of the staff of the Committee. I believe them to be perhaps the finest in the Congress. Further, they act under close direction and are all responsible to me. In matters such as the one you raise in your letter, they. were not involved, but had they been, this would have been a request that came from the Committee, not from some separate element, "the staff." With every good.wish, I am Approved For Release 2007/11/13: CIA-RDP84M00127R000100040007-7