MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, 16 JANUARY 1980

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85-00988R000500050043-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
22
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 9, 2003
Sequence Number: 
43
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 24, 1980
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85-00988R000500050043-6.pdf881.68 KB
Body: 
Approve r Release 2003/0E' .~qq~~l?I~'~ RDP85-0 8R0005;II0'SD0X~CCc~11~ii4 3_%14-80 2 4 JAN 1980 MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Committee Members I SUBJECT . Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting, 16 January 1980 1. The Executive Committee met on 16 January 1980 on two topics: FY 1982 R&D Program Issues and Initiatives and Doing More With Less. (Mr. Carlucci chaired the meeting; Messrs. Dirks, McMahon, Wortman, Clarke, Lipton and Ware were present. Messrs. Stein and Taylor also attended as observers.)I I 2. Mr.O reviewed the FY 1982-FY 1985 Directorate goals and requirements on which the FY 1982 R&D program will be based. He also noted the anticipated budget implications of meeting those requirements, which will call for considerably more growth in the S&T program between FY 1981-82 than took place between FY 1980-81. He then outlined several key issues that will need to be considered in developing the FY 1982 program. 0 4. In the area of exploratory research, adequate funds will be needed to meet the requirements being placed on ORD and to maintain a centralized exploratory research capability. Noting recent reductions in this area, Mr. Dirks suggested that if a budget increase of only 5 percent were obtained, the program might not be worth continuing. Mr. Lipton noted that inflation plus 10.percent would probably be appropriate. Mr. Carlucci said that he would su ort an effort to obtain increased exploratory research funds. 0338 25X Approved For Release 2d 1U?1 J CIA-RDP 5-00988R000500050043-6 Approv0or Release 2003/06/26: CIA-R4P85-M88R000500050043-6 11 25X1 5. Regarding I odernization, Mr.lI noted that the automation currently programmed in FY 1982 totals about $2 million, current projections call for beyond that which is programmed, and a question exists whether or not II modernization can be achieved concurrently with the expanded requirements for coverage of the "Arc of Crisis." A Community-level and =study is underway to determine the coverage requirements. Mr. Carlucci urged that any such study include an examination of political stability in potential host countries and encouraged innovative approaches for coverage, including remoting and contracting out the function. 8. Mr. Lipton introduced the second agenda topic, "Doing More With Less," noting that Ms.~would brief the Committee on the results of the Office of the Comptroller's research on measuring and enhancing organizational performance. Ms. said that increasing requirements and declining resources seem to leave the Agency with three options: obtaining more resources, which is unlikely; doing less; or increasing efficiency. Programs to do the latter, both inside and outside the Agency, were examined to determine what lessons might be learned. While some initiatives and activities have been undertaken in the Agency in the areas of productivity measurement, evaluation, and/or enhancement, no Agency-wide or directorate- wide approach to the problem exists. Ms. ighlighted efforts in other Government agencies and outlined the success of one program at the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals (BHA) in the Social Security Administration. Mr. Carlucci noted that the BHA judges involved initially voiced the skepticism one might expect from some quarters if such a program were launched in the Agency. u Approved For Release 2003/06/~'b ti DP85-00988R000500050043-6 Approvesor Release 2003/06/26 : CIA-RDP85-ff88R000500050043-6 9. In applying the BHA case to the Agency, Ms. Olisted a number of Agency functions similar to those existing elsewhere in Government that coul?measured (i.e. communications--O C, procurement-- OL, and legal services--OGC and OLC). She also no a unc ons more unique to the Agency that wou d be more difficult to measure (i.e., imagery analysis--NPIC and OIA, all-source production--NFAC production offices, and human source reporting--DDO). The potential gains. of such a program to the Agency include increased efficiencies and savings; development of management information for internal use; providing comprehensive models of components, thus enhancing our corporate memory; and providing other supporting data. Mr. McMahon noted such a program would probably be well received by our Congressional Oversight Committees. On the negative side, there might not be a gain in efficiency; there would be a number of costs; it could be perceived as an unnecessary bureaucratic exercise; and it might adversely affect employee morale. Ms.~ noted several ways of reducing these risks, including a strong management commitment, thorough planning, and clearly defining targets for improving performance. 0 10. Three options for an Agency program were highlighted: Encourage on-going activities and establish a point of contact. Develop an Agency-wide program with a large central staff and consulting effort. Start with pilot efforts that could be expanded to other offices and that would require some central staff and consulting. After a brief discussion, Mr. Carlucci noted his belief that productivity measurement/enhancement would be emphasized in Government in the 1980s and eserved serious thought. *It was agreed that member's,should be'provided copies 'of 'the ,briefing outline (attached) so that they could discuss the pros and cons of the options presented with their staffs. Members should provide their comments, including possible pilot efforts that could be initiated in their components and where staff res o:nsibilit for such a function should p ..