RESTRICTIVE USE OF PRIVATELY-OWNED VEHICLES
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
September 5, 2009
Sequence Number:
8
Case Number:
Publication Date:
November 23, 1979
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 94.91 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
23 November 1979
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. James McDonald
Chairman, Agency Energy Committee
DDO Rep, Agency Energy Committee
SUBJECT: Restrictive Use of Privately-Owned Vehicles
1. This memo is in response to the "hand-out" at our 8 August
meeting regarding restricted use of privately-owned vehicles for
official business.
a. Question - At what level should approval be required?
Response - We feel that the present approving level in
the DDO is appropriate. In this Directorate,
use of POVs for official business is approved
by the Chiefs of Support, Branch Chiefs, or
higher.
b. Question - Should we reimburse for mileage over routes
with shuttle service?
Response - The general sentiment in the Directorate is
against restrictive use of POVs, even over
shuttle routes. The key question is, "Can
we equate the gasoline savings with the
additional manhours expended in taking the
shuttle or public transportation." Making a
round trip by shuttle between Headquarters and
one of the other Agency buildings normally will
add at least an hour to the trip over what it
would take to drive one's POV. We must keep in
mind that energy is not our only shortage -- we
also suffer from personnel shortages. Our
position, therefore, is that we should not
establish energy policies that tend to reduce
personnel efficiency and productivity levels.
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
CON ENE` 10"R 0
c. Question - Should the use of u-drive-it official
vehicles be encouraged?
Response - Our employees would like to see greater
use of "u-drive-it" official vehicles.
However, this hardly could be considered
energy-saving.
d. Question - To what extent should we resort to
regulatory issuance to enforce approved
policy?
Response - It is recognized that this may be a more
effective way of having our energy policies
enforced since voluntary compliance does
not work. However, the general feeling is
that energy-saving is such a fluid matter
that it may be more practical to have the
policies defined in a policy paper rather
than by regulation.
CCU ".NTI
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1
25X1
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
DDO Rep, Agency Energy Committee
DATE
23 November 1979
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
1.
Mr. James McDonald
Chairman, Agency Energy
-
6 NOV
1979
if 71- 0`1
2. rnmrn
2C 02
25X1
3.
4.
5.
25X1
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
OL y ,.$
15.
FORM
1-79
610 USE PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
? 0
Approved For Release 2009/09/05: CIA-RDP85-00988R000500090008-1