PETITION SEEKING RELIEF FROM KEY BLDG PARKING FEE INCREASE(s)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP85-00988R000600100014-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: November 11, 2016
• Document Release Date: May 25, 1999
• Sequence Number: 14
• Content Type: MF

k ' . - , . I, ;! -4 L'IY
~~?,--e---9 9/`286CI44-g,DP85 00600'1x4-r--u-?~-----
MEMORANDUM FOR: CIA Component Administration Offices in Key Building, Ross
FROM : Agency Employees Using Key Building Parking Facilities
ECT : Petition Seeking Relief from Key Bldg Parking Fee Increase(s)
The. undersigned hereby protest the announced 20% increase (to $360
per year) in the Key Building parking fee, due to become effective 1 May 75,
as both discriminatory and unjustified for the following reasons:
(1) We have been and c'nt i niin to be discriminated against as com-
pared wi A o olo" nes f .ork.in at Langley Headquarters who are provided
free parking and therefore already en eat year 4~~i $300 more usable incomer
(at the same Grade/Step levels) than do we who must, pay for our own parking
in Key Bldg! And those among us who decline to pay so much must still run
an added risk of unprotected parking on local area sidestreets.
(2) We have been observing for some time now the w'..dling use of
Ivey' Bldg Park? my GY,a~-mss ar,d strongly suspect that we are now being as.:ed to
ina.ze up that difference in teduced income for Charles E. Smith Companies
(CESC) , formerly known as Charles E. Smith Management.
(3) Since there are no apparent special garage services or atten-
dants, or other building maintenance personnel solely responsible for super-
vision of the parking garage, we must assume-hatthe parking fee increase
comes as a result of some increase in tTe rmana ?ement's operating expenses for
the buildin as a %.,hole. Therefore, we feel that the - essee (U.S.GOv't) ,
ra her t an a couple hundred Agency employees using the parking garage, should
he the major contributor toward any such increased building operating expenses
if, as we suspect, thi S CQriStit ti teS rte-irk} excus0for i }7
in the r~ reposed increase
f
(4). Lacking specific know-ledge of the priviliges, restrictions, and
monetary terms of the ? Gov't lease contract with CESC (CESE-t) , we tend to
this situation as one in which th
as fe collecting intrsdi
e ear s
ac wall- condoning, if not in fact inQ, CESC (CESM to oblicie fAcyenc
y
e:il olo ees -- e majority occupants of the bldg -- to subsidize and/or supple-
m.ou~tl~e envy's (Gov't rei:tal outlay V. Key Bldg. Since we also lack any
knowledge of the terns of such contracts be.t.aeen CESC (CES I) and other torpor-.
ate occupants of Key Bldg, neither do we have any basis for concrete compariso:
of our situation vis-a-vis theirs.
in view of the above and of the new Freedom of Information Act, we
feel entitled to (but are not yet asking for) FULL disclosure of such terms
of the Covernment's lease with CESC (CESM) as: what it cos s, at 'it enti-
tles the Agency to, when and under what negotiating conditions it is renewable
and how it compares with leases held by other corporate occupants of Key Bldg.
We therefore seek through the Agency -- as primarily responsible for
our being thus obliged to divert so much of our salaries in the first place,
and as_feo-collecting intermediary in the second place =-- some form of relief
from the prospect of this and further such penalties at the hands of CESC (or
CESti) , and we . believe that, if nothing more, we are at least entitled to a
increa
ag, s) .
AT I' \CE3rE'ENT 1110 9 Air 1:l 1975
P1,TITIO;i 1;'1 '0'1 K?.Y UII!}TNG
PARKING F} F. 1NCR1'ASE (z)
While cir_cula?il,y this pr,titionn, I learned that the Cover.rn--
me.nt (F\gency) implements different employee par inc:( !,)et1.iC i e c ~_. di f-
fercai t Agency c'c ce,t").i C(I n,-,t a I I zt t i Y.-.
1 31Crlt,~"Lill: t a ;':, , #EI"t C,
do in fact Provide t'iilj.;l_oyee .p.`'r?,in, at lea. ,;t: t"f sc, o of TIZ:'I:i. 'T'7't:~.'~
scorn to re,. ot a very l 1.^:.1c 'nc .r'r-i0tlS ~?:r`c u.7`.-1~ Cat"+ 3:V 1.17 ;1 ati'en ' 711.
S
arre t its inf orriit t l
C~ alt cr+meoo to t.0 hoc inc
in thegent petition, but t?ould so:'ii of ,it ficielit importance to w-f!:r
ar
t
-
a
,
a
.Y'E~t~he.' 'one r ~7r'?1=SfzU an c'E ~ 72:r~i)s_ a e 3:'efer T:c 3.1:x. t.h F"~ S~)C.)7 e t..(t its
Li+^f'i t-3rt cc-nlr r'7 t,
,
_Le
any nopu for anpuif~~r
Approved For Release 199/09/28 : CIA-RDP85-00988R000
25X1A9a