LETTER TO DR. RICHARD PIPES FROM LEO CHERNE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85B00134R000200030009-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 25, 2009
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 9, 1976
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85B00134R000200030009-7.pdf114.41 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2009/09/25: CIA-RDP85B00134R000200030009-7 ,e- PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD December 10, 1976 Dear Mr. Bush: At our meeting last week, Dr. Pipes sought the Board's opinion on getting the unclassified "B" team material into the public domain. We were concerned that he did not get an adequate answer, and have therefore sent him the attached letter. Sincerely, Wheaton B. Byers The Honorable George Bush Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D. C. 20505 Enclosure: Copy of Mr. Cherne's ltr to Dr. Pipes, dtd 12/9/76 Approved For Release 2009/09/25: CIA-RDP85B00134R000200030009-7 Approved For Release 2009/09/25: CIA-RDP85BOOl34R000200030009-7 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY BOARD December 9, 1976 Dear Dr. Pipes: On behalf of the members, I want to express our deep appreciation to you, Mr. Nitze, and General Graham for meeting with us last Thursday and for the diligent effort which clearly you and your colleagues have put into the competitive analysis experiment. While the judgment is obviously tentative pending completion of the exercise, the presentations last Thursday do seem to support the notion of competitive analysis in some form. We will continue to track the current experiment, and it may be that Bob Galvin's committee will want to meet with you again at a later date. The Board's future membership is of course uncertain, but I am hopeful that in one way or another, Bob Galvin, Johnny Foster, Edward Teller, and Bill Casey will be able to continue their work in this area. In the course of our meeting, you noted that much of the material on which the "B" team judgments were based is unclassified, and asked for our opinion as to whether there would be any objection to pub- lishing it. If memory serves, we agreed that nothing should be done until the experiment is over, but this was not a complete answer, nor can we give you one. Since the experiment is being conducted under the aegis of the DCI, you should solicit his judgment. Our principal concern in this case is in protecting the circumstances under which the information has been pulled together and the purposes which we hope to achieve. If outside judgments on key intelligence issues are to be sought and are to contribute to .improving our national estimates, they cannot at the same time be used in any way which is publicly critical of the intelligence community. We see great merit in involving the experience and expertise found in academia and else- where outside the Government, but if this involvement is to be con- structive, it requires a fiduciary relationship. Regardless of whether criticism of the National Intelligence Estimates is justified or unjustified, fOrZ OF_ x AL USE ONN ` Approved For Release 2009/09/25: CIA-RDP85BOOl34R000200030009-7 Approved For Release 2009/09/25: CIA-RDP85BOOl34R000200030009-7 0 we cannot in this circumstance improve the estimating process by public discussion, when one of the participants is compelled to be mute. We look forward to receiving your written comments, and regret that your meeting with us necessitated a change in your personal plans. Please do not hesitate to write if there are questions, or if I can be of help to you in any way. ' Leo Cherne Chairman Dr. Richard Pipes FOR OF -'1.~1A~. U5 Approved For Release 2009/09/25: CIA-RDP85BOOl34R000200030009-7 STAT