RETENTION OF CLASSIFICATION OF UNEVALUATED INTELLIGENCE REPORTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85B00236R000200010002-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 11, 2001
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85B00236R000200010002-0.pdf217.18 KB
Body: 
. Approved For Rase 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP85B00236WO200010002-0 MEMORANDUM FOR; Director of Central Intelligence VIA; Deputy Director for Operations Office of General Counsel FROM; John F. Blake Deputy Director for Administration SUBJECT: Retention of Classification of Unevaluated Intelligence Reports 1. Action Requested: Approval of declassification policy described herein and signature of letter to the Archivist. 2. Background: a. The National Archives and Records Service (NARS) on 22 April 1977 determined that unevaluated intelligence reports disseminated by the Operations Directorate to the Intelligence Community are permanent dissemination records. The rationale is that these reports constitute a record of the / of foreign intelli n collected ILLEGIB A Agency P4-ds the t AAQ( large numbers of these reports wed accessioned to NARS as permanent records by other U.S. Government agencies. b. All permanent records are subject to systematic review for declassification as required in E.O. 11652 and E.O. 12065. Documents, 30 or 20 years of age respectively, must either be declassified or the agency head must certify that continued classification is required for national security reasons. Approved For Release 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP85B00236R000200010002-0 Approved For Rase 2001/08/08 : CIA-RDP85B00236RM0200010002-0 c. The classification review of unevaluated intelligence , aM reports produced by GIG aRd-~;4AJ-9-59 fe-r 4the period 1946-50 has raised serious questions regarding the declassification and release of am unevaluated reports. Although the substance of individual reports often does not merit continued classification, items in the report format, owed / l-a,ion /ltl~et911oAps# such as" Place Acquired provide evidence of CIA operationsai.q_a esn tho v~is 'a~ IfycoctTiu released to tht-7abtft. Also, Source descriptions, even though general, pinpoint sectors within a rM LAW and fetid )(' -,wve^Q /iaiaa,v /le1at4sud -r country, = which agents area reporting to CIAA Such revelations of CIA .+even llrOwl Sri pem43 -reti operations, would not be viewed kindly by the country concerned. A further risk is yr.