OGC SUGGESTED ADDITIONS TO(SANITIZED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85B00552R000100030013-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 6, 2007
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 3, 1982
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85B00552R000100030013-9.pdf141.83 KB
Body: 
r t Approved For Release 2007/07/06 : CIA-RDP85BOO552R000100030013-9 l a[e ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP TO, (Name, office svmtal, room number, building, Agency/Post) Initials Date 2. ! 19 3. /~- 4. Di3 a ion File Note and Return proval For Clearance Per Conversation As Requested For Correction Prepare Reply irculate For Your Information See Me mment Investigate Signature Coordination Justify A CO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, clearances, and similar actions OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) Pmscrib.d by GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11206 Approved For Release 2007/07/06 : CIA-RDP85BOO552R000100030013-9 (i DD/A :icg1str Central Intelligence Agency Weshinpfon, D.C. 20505 SUBJECT: nrr ~11VVd Additions to - Of the three suggested additions, I told = I would compromise and accept the one he numbered "e. Expense Reimbursements, (1) . . . accept . . . reimbursement . . . for actual expenses . . . by . . . a tax-exempt organization - I also said I wanted to add a sentence, or otherwise ensure, that honorarium receipt is prohibited. - I said that I could not buy his paras (2) or (3). Approved For Release 2007/07/06 : CIA-RDP85BOO552ROO0100030013-9 k CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ff WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 r ----~~yr :ACC I - - General Counsel RE: Reimbursement of Expenses of Agency Employees Attached is the proposed rule I mentioned was on its way. If you have any questions, please call me. In essence it would leave 0 intact, but would add a new subsection (e)'to deal with the question of expense reim- bursement. Such a provision is necessary for the Agency's professionals who are required to attend conferences and meetings in order to retain their professional qualifications and to help train others to retain theirs. In either event, in my view it is the Agency that ultimately benefits. This is particularly true for lawyers and accountants who are faced with continuing professional education requirements. The rule proposal would permit our people to obtain the reimbursement where it is customary for others to do so. The rule we propose is presently in place at the SEC and has proven to be OCC 82-09425 19 October 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: Stanley Sporkin General Counsel 1. In response to your request, I have reviewed the law governing receipt of reimbursements by Agency employees of travel and subsistence expenses from private organizations. Based on this review, I have attached a proposed new section which would amend0 to authorize such reimbursements in certain cases where employees are invited to speak before private organizations. 2. Subparagraph (1) of the proposed new section would authorize the receipt of reimbursements by Agency employees of transportation, lodging, and food expenses from qualified tax- exempt educational or professional groups of the type described in 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). Receipt of reimbursements from such groups is excepted from the criminal conflict of interest provisions of 18 U.S.C. 209 when such reimbursements are incident to attendance at meetings which the employee is attending while on official duty status. 3. Subparagraph (2) would authorize the receipt of reimbursements by Agency employees of such travel and subsistence expenses from any private organization when no conflict of interest exists and the employee is in an off-duty status- Off- duty status is accomplished if annual or administrative leave is taken by the employee while attending the meeting. 4. Subparagraph (3) would authorize the granting of administrative leave by senior Agency officials when it is in the interests of the Agency for the employee to speak to a particular group regarding his field of expertise. The granting of admini- tive in such cases is supported by Agency regulations, which describe admin- istrative leave as an excused absence tram duty without loss of pay or charge to leave. In fact, suvpas r -expressly provides that: "An employee may be excused to attend a convention when attendance is determined to be in conference provides " Thus, it would appear that the the interest of the Agency. granting of administrative leave in such circumstances is already contemplated. eceipt of reim- 5. It is my understanding that the r other bursements as outlined above is permitted in parts of the federal government, therefore, the Agency would not be alone in -14 -" I I Attachment: As stated. Approved For Release 2007/07/06 : CIA-RDP85B00552R000100030013-9 e? Expense Reimbursements (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this regulation speakers may, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4111, while on Official duty status, accept bona fide reimbursement for actual expenses for travel or necessary subsistence incident to attendance at meetings from a erson determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be a tax-exempt organization of the type described in 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), provided, however, that no Government payment or reimbursement is made for the expense so reimbursed, and provided further that the speaker is not reimbursed, nor payment made on his or her behalf, for those personal living benefits, which are unreasonable or lavish. (2) Consistent with the law governing conflicts of interest, speakers appropriately on either administrative leave or annual leave may accept bona fide reimbursement for actual expenses personally incurred for travel or necessary subsistence from persons in addition to organizations described in subpara- graph (1) above, provided that the speaker is not reimbursed, payment made on his or her behalf, for those personal living expenses, nor gifts, entertainment or other personal benefits, which are unreasonable or lavish. (3) In instances in which an Agency employee has an expertise in a particular area, and it is in the interests of the Agency for such employee to participate in a particular program, the appropriate Operating Official or Head of Independent Office may approve administrative leave for such appearance for themselves or their subordinates.