PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP85B01152R000400490024-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 21, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 2, 2008
• Sequence Number: 24
• Publication Date: January 12, 1983
• Content Type: MEMO

Approved For Release 2008/06/02 : CIA-RDP85BO1152R000400490024-7
ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP
TO: (Name, o ensy~p symbol. number,
building,
1. CMO/DDA.
APp ovai
el C?
Approved For Release 2008/06/02 : CIA-RDP85BO1152R000400490024-7
7D-18 Hqs, x6535 I
5041-102 OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
Prescribed by GSA
FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.206
of approvals, concurrences, disposals,
d similar actions
 Approved For Release 2008/06/02 : CIA-RDP85B01152R000400490024-7
LEO_ ~7
12 JAN 1983
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Communications
Director of Data Processing
Director of Finance
Director of Information Services
Director of Logistics
Director of Medical Services
Director of Security
Director of Training and Education
MG Career Management Officer
FROM: Harry E. Fitzwater
Deputy Director-for Administration
SUBJECT: Performance Appraisal
REFERENCE: dated 11 December 1982
1. In an effort to halt the escalation of Performance
Appraisal Report (PAR) ratings in the Directorate, it is
requested that each of you review the performance appraisal
concepts in your Subgroup and take whatever action may be
necessary to ensure that PAR's are not only well-written but
also reflect equitable, realistic ratings. In assigning a
PAR rating above the 4 level, rating officials are to evaluate
the employee's performance in light of the narrative descriptions
of the meaning of the performance rating levels and are to
describe, in the narrative portion of the PAR, the specific
accomplishments which merit the higher rating. In accordance
with paragraph 4. of Reference, your boards and panels should
monitor your performance appraisal system and flag those
raters who consistently rate their employees high. It should
be emphasized that consistent overrating casts a reflection on
the performance of the rater.
2. As I mentioned in our staff meeting on 4 January,
I will, in the future, review and monitor PAR's written on
all Directorate SIS officers to ensure compliance with Reference.
Tarry. E. Fitzwater
Distribution:
Orig - DDA/Qv10 Subject
cy each addressee
DDA Subject
1 - DDA Chrono
1 - HEF File
1 - DDA/CMO Chrono
DDA/Pers. Off. as
(10 January
DD/A 83-0060
nrlsasyny
Harry E. Fitzwater
Approved For Release 2008/06/02 : CIA-RDP85B01152R000400490024-7
STAT