EAA: SIG-IEP VOTES ON KEY ISSUES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 8, 2009
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 26, 1983
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9.pdf248.03 KB
Body: 
... j:,t .L I _i_.,54_ I I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 jtion %LT)/Washington. D.C. 20230 *to In di ' MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: 2 6 SEP 1983 Roger Robinson Director of International Economic Affairs National Security Council .I.k,ct Lionel H. Olmer ' tAA Under Secretary for International Trade SUBJECT: EAA: SIG-IEP Votes on Key Issues At last Friday's meeting of the SIG-IEP to discuss remaining EAA renewal issues, Secretary Regan requested all agencies to vote on the seven issues identified at that meeting by today. The agencies' preferences are reflected in the attached document. Clearly, there remain significant differences on many of the issues. These differences must be resolved as soon as possible. House consideration of the EAA has already begun, and Senate action could begin this week. Please initiate whatever action is necessary to resolve these questions. We are prepared to assist in whatever way you request. Attachment NSC review completed. Sit 'GI ?+' Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 ? Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 CONTRACT SANCTITY (FOREIGN POLICY CONTROLS) Issue - What position should the Administration adopt on contract sanctity? Options Option 1 - House ("Berman") language. *Agencies Supporting: Commerce; State; Treasury; Defense; Justice Option 2 - Compromise between House and Administration position. Existing contracts cannot be affected unless: O Prior Congressional consultation O Prior report to Congress O Presidential determination that not applying controls would severely damage the United States national interest. *Agencies Supporting: Agriculture; OPD; USTR (fallback position); Option 3 - Continue to support provision in Administration bill. *Agencies Supporting: USTR SECRET ? Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET EXTRATERRITORIALITY (FOREIGN POLICY) Issue - What position should the Administration adopt on the extraterritorial reach of foreign policy controls? Options Option 1 - Strike. *Agencies Supporting: Commerce; Defense; Treasury; Agriculture; Justice Option 2 - Strike House provision and substitute provision which permits extraterritorial controls but requires President to try to negotiate foreign country agreements on the use of these controls (Rep. Roth). *Agencies Supporting: USTR; Defense (fallback position); Commerce (fallback position); Treasury (fallback position) Option 3 - Strike, but exclude foreign subsidiaries of U.S. firms from foreign policy controls. *Agencies Supporting: State; OPD SECRET Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET CONGRESSIONAL CONSULTATION (FOREIGN POLICY CONTROLS) Issue - What position should the Administration adopt on proposed Congressional consultation provisions? Options Option 1 - Strike. *Agencies Supporting: Defense; OPD Option 2 - Do not oppose prior consultation but strike requirement to report to Congress prior to imposition, expansion or extension of controls. *Agencies Supporting: State; USTR (but permit the President to take emergency action without prior reporting or consulting); Treasury , Option 3 - Do not oppose. *Agencies Supporting: Commerce; Agriculture; Justice; Treasury (tallback) SECRET Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET NATIONAL SECURITY CONTROLS UNILATERAL CONTROLS Issue - What position should the Administration adopt on the House provision to decontrol certain unilaterally controlled national security items? Options Option 1 - Strike. *Agencies Supporting: All agencies support (State, Defense, Commerce, USTR, Treasury, Agriculture; OPD); Justice Option 2 - Strike current provision and substitute requirement to decontrol unilaterally controlled items, available from foreign sources, if we are Unsuccessful in obtaining multilateral controls within a specified time. *Agencies Supporting: None Cr.ion 3 - Modify provision to allow the Secretary, by regula- tion, to require licenses for certain types and categories of end-users and end-uses. *Agencies Supporting: None Option 4 - Limit House provisions to unilaterally controlled goods which are available fror foreign sources. *Agencies Supporting: None SECRET Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET FOREIGN AVAILABILITY Issue - What position should the Administration adopt on proposals relating to foreign availability? Options Burden-Shifting Provisions: Option 1 - Strike. *Agencies Supportin5: Defense; Commerce; Agriculture; Treasury; OPD Option 2 - Require applicant to present "clear and convincing evidence" before burden shifts to government to disprove foreign availability. *Agencies Supporting: State; USTR; Justice; Treasury (fallbac Senate Foreign Policy 6 Month Decontrol: Option 1 - Strike. *Agencies Supporting: Defense ' Option 2 - Extend time period to one year. *Agencies Supporting: Commerce; OPD; Agriculture; Defense (fallback position) ; Treasury Option 3 - Support, because of intentional loophole. *Agencies Supporting: USTR; State (if the Commerce role is limited to determining foreign availability while the Secretary of State is empowered to determine the foreign policy implications of that availability); Justice SECRET :5 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 House National Security 6 Month Decontrol: Option 1 - Strike. *Agencies Supporting: All agencies support (State; Treasury; Agriculture; USTR; Commerce; Defense; OPD; Justice) Option 2 - Limit decontrol to unilaterally controlled items. *Agencies Supporting: None Option 3 - Extend negotiating time period to one year. *Agencids Supporting: None Option 4 - Combine options 2 and 3. *Agencies Supporting: None Option 5 - Support, if loophole simi1ar to Senate foreign policy control loophole is added. *Agencies Supporting: USTR (fallback position); Commerce (fallback position) SECRET Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET LICENSING OF COCOM TRADE Issue - What position should the Administration adopt on the issue of licensing trade to COCOM countries? Options Option 1 - Support Senate provision, but clarify that the item must be on both the MCTL and the Commodity Control List. *Agencies Supporting: Commerce; Defense; Agriculture;Treasury Option 2 - No decontrol of COCOM trade, but reduce licensing time from 90 days to 30 days. *Agencies Supporting: Treasury (fallback); Defense (fallba.0'.0; Justice Option 3 - Support House provision, but modify to allow the Secretary, by regulation, to require licenges for certain types and categories of end-users and end-uses. *Agencies Supporting: State; *STR; OPD Option 4 - Eliminate COCOM licensing for items below the "adminis- trative exceptions note" level, and reduce licensing time to 30 days on remaining items. (Rep. Roth). *Agencies Supporting: None SECRET Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9 SECRET AGRICULTURE Issue - Should the Administration oppose new Congressional limitations on the President's authority to control.the export of agricultural commodities? Options National Security: Option 1 - Oppose Senate limitations. *Agencies Supporting: Defense; USTR; Commerce; OPD; Treasury (but as fallback could accept some strengthening); Justice Option 2 - Do' not oppose. *Agencies Supporting: State; Agriculture Foreign Policy: Option 1 - Oppose House and Percy/Dixon limitations. *Agencies Supporting: State; Defense; USTR; Commerce; OPD; Treasury (but as fallback could compromise); Justice Option 2 - Do not oppose. *Agencies Supporting: Agriculture Short Supply: Option 1 - Oppose House limitation. *Agencies Supporting: State; Defense; USTR; Commerce; OPD; Treasury (but, as fallback could compromise); Justice Option 2 - Do not oppose. *Agencies SlIpporting: Agriculture SECRET , Approved For Release 2009/05/08: CIA-RDP85M00364R000400550020-9