THE ADMINISTRATION POSTURE TOWARD THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP85M00364R001001580082-0
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date:
July 9, 2008
Sequence Number:
82
Case Number:
Publication Date:
July 12, 1983
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 172.6 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01001580082-0~
lAA'IfIDOMXL F/;G 5}yU
The Director of Central Intelligence
National Intelligence Council
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
Assistant National Intelligence Officer for USSR-EE
THROUGH NIO/USSR-EE
SUBJECT The Administration Posture Toward the Russian People
1. My 8 June memorandum to you addressed two basic points: getting the
President access to Soviet TV and the type of message we should deliver.
Even though time was too short to work out a Presidential address on Soviet
TV, the US is taking steps to improve our communications to the Soviet
people: we are working to expand the capability of our radio stations and we
are envisioning asking for USG access to Soviet TV in a new cultural exchange
agreement to be negotiated. I naturally recommend that these initiatives be
pursued vigorously. In this memorandum I wish to address the type of message
we should be sending out in official USG statements and suggest that you
discuss these ideas at one of your sessions with Judge Clark. (Proposed
talking points are attached.)
2. I believe our guiding principle should be always to make a
differentiation between the people and the government. We are, of course,
doing this in the Nationalities Policy we are developing for use with the
ethnic minorities in the USSR. I believe we must also do this for the
Russians who constitute about one half of the Soviet population. That
differentiation between the people and the government should be kept
particularly in mind in the preparation of high-level US statements. We
should not be calling for a revolt but we should make it clear that we
recognize the distinction between people and the government. In that way we
can attempt to retain the Russian people as a potential ally in our attempts
to complicate or change Soviet policies which are dangerous for US and not
beneficial to the Russian people themselves.
. 3. The explicitness of the differentiation will have to vary according
to the primary recipient of the message and the medium used for delivery.
Thus, in official statements to the Soviet government or in US statements
allowed on Soviet TV, our differentiation message must be implicit, but it
should still be there. For instance, when talking about arms control
GONADENTIAL
CL BY SIGNER
RVW 12 JUL 89
DECL OADR
NIC #5053-83
12 July 1983
C lyd
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01001580082-0
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364R001001580082-0
WNHULNIIAL
negotiations we can note our conviction that Russian people want peace; or,
in discussing the possibility of mutual cooperation, we can allude to the
courage shown by the Russian people in World War II. In statements by US
officials dealing with the Soviet problem but addressed to US audiences we
should be more forthright -- and have the radio stations transmit the
statement to the USSR later. For instance, on the appropriate occasion, the
President may wish to pay tribute to an exiled Russian cultural figure, say
the conductor Rostropovich or the writer Aksyonov, both of whom were and
remain very popular figures in Russia. In talking about these or other
Russians, the President could note that we welcome these cultural giants to
our country but regret that the repressive Soviet policies here forced these
best sons of Russia to leave their homeland. Or, on some religious occasion,
the US could give recognition to the Orthodox religion -- barely allowed but
acquiring new importance in the USSR -- as embodying the conscience of the
Russian nation and pay particular tribute to any religious figures who have
recently been persecuted by the government. Or, in talking about the
military competition between our two countries, the US can refer to our wish
that we could implement the peace program of a true Russian nationalist --
Academician Sakharov - but note his advice that, failing a change of policy
on the part of the Soviet Government, the US must be ready to defend itself
by all means at its disposal. Other examples can be given but the important
thing is to think in these terms and to look for occasions on which to
present these messages.
4. Beyond declarations, we could take one expenseless action to show
Russians that we see them as a nation distinct from their current
government: We could give official recognition to some giants of Russian
culture (e.g., Tolstoy, Tchaikovsky) by commemorating them in stamps and then
publicizing the fact through our radio stations. Preferably, this
recognition could come either in a stamp series devoted to Russian writers
and composers but it could also come as part of an international series. In
either case the point would be to show our esteem for the Russian nation.
5. The nice thing about these proposals is that they are free. All
they require is that we think of the Russian people as a potential ally in
our struggle against Soviet dictatorship and expansionism.
6. In discussing this concept with John Lenczowski of the NSC staff, I
learned that he had written a long memorandum on it to Judge Clark. You may
want to refer to it in any discussion you may have with Judge Clark.
Attachment: Proposed Talking Points
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364R001001580082-0
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01001580082-0
CONFIDENTIAL
ATTACHMENT
SUBJECT: Proposed Talking Points for DCI in Meeting with Judge Clark on
the Administration Posture Toward the Russian People
1. Glad you found idea of Presidential address to the Soviet people of
interest and trust it will be kept under consideration.
2. Fully support current work designed to bolster radio stations and to
gain access to Soviet media through new cultural exchange agreement.
3. Believe that in addressing the Soviet Union, we should always make
differentiation between people and government.
4. In diplomatic exchanges with Soviet Government, differentiation must
be implicit. For instance, when talking about arms control negotiations with
Soviet government we can express our full confidence in desire of Russian
people for peace.
5. In statements to US audiences, which can and should be transmitted
to USSR by our radio stations, differentiation should be much more explicit.
For instance, we can pay tribute to some exiled Russian cultural figure and
express sorrow that repressive Soviet policies forces these best sons of
Russia to leave their homeland.
6. We could also commemorate Russian cultural figures in US stamps,
either as part of a strictly Russian series or as part of an international
series.
7. The main point is that, in all we say or do, we think of the Russian
people not as one with their government but rather as a potential ally in our
struggle against Soviet dictatorship and expansionism.
8. I understand that John Lenczowski of your staff has been working on
some similar ideas. He can probably spearhead any effort to put them into
practice.
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01001580082-0
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01001580082-0
'~'DCI/NIC/A/NIO/USSR-EE/ ~b, 12 Jul 83
Distribution:
Orig. - DCI
1 - DDCI
1 - DDI
1 - DDO
1 --SA/IA
1 - DDI/REG.
1 - C/NIC
1 - VC/NIC
1 - VC/NIC
1 - Exec. Reg.
1 - NIO/USSR-EE
Approved For Release 2008/07/09: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01001580082-0