INSURGENCY: SIGNIFICANT TRENDS IN THE LAST DECADE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85M00364R001101660069-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
April 18, 2008
Sequence Number: 
69
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 12, 1983
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85M00364R001101660069-5.pdf116.96 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364R001101660069-5 CONFIDENTIAL THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE National Intelligence Council NIC 2689-83 12 April 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence Deputy Director of Central Intelligence VIA: Chairman, National Intelligence Council!' FROM: Charles E. Waterman, VC/NIC SUBJECT: Insurgency: Significant Trends in the Last Decade 1. The purpose of this memorandum is to highlight an obvious but insufficiently noted shift in the political nature of insurgencies worldwide. Most insurgencies a decade ago were leftist or at least anti- Western due to intense nationalism. They were generally backed by the Soviets or their representative, and were victorious. This situation no longer pertains. 2. Specifically: -- In 1973, 10 politically significant insurgencies were underway (see chart). Nine were anti-Western in political content, of which seven were victorious in at least the short run. The one anti-leftist insurgency lost. -- In 1983, there are 12 politically significant insurgencies extant. Six are anti-leftist in political content, of which the outcome of five remains in dispute and one has been largely suppressed. There are also six anti-Western insurgencies of which the outcome of three remains in dispute and three have been largely suppressed. -- Four of the now ongoing anti-leftist insurgencies are against leftist regimes resulting from successful 1973 insurgencies. Soviet "victories" have not been turned into "defeats" but they have become costly. -- In at least two anti-leftist insurgencies, the Soviets probably believe there is US support. C .-IC Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364R001101660069-5 Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364R001101660069-5 CONFIDENTIAL 3. This situation must affect Soviet judgments on support to insurgencies, probably as follows: -- "Peoples Revolutionary War," formerly a leftist preserve, has become a two-edged sword. -- Direct intervention, as in Afghanistan, does not guarantee success. -- Leftist insurgencies are no longer cheap instruments by which to project influence. Initial victories in such wars may be ephemeral, and increasingly costly. -- Increasing Western, and particularly US support, to anti- leftist insurgencies is a disturbing trend, and must be considered a real possibility. -- Support by a leftist state to insurgencies in neighboring countries may now trigger a retaliation internally in the supporting state. This possibility gives any operational planner pause. 4. In short, we have moved away from a situation in which insurgency was a leftist monopoly. In part this is simply because there are more established leftist governments, in part because of more aggressive Western tactics, and in part because of activist regional policies of certain conservative regimes (i.e. South Africa). For reasons outlined in paragraph 3, a case can be made that the overall trend is desirable from the US perspective. , e, . ~ Z_ e~_~ ez , , Charles E. Waterman Attachment: Chart Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01101660069-5 Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364R001101660069-5 CONFIDENTIAL NIC 2689-83 12 April 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence Deputy Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Insurgency: Significant Trends in the Last Decade NIC/VC/NIC:CEWATERMAN:jcn 12 Apr. 83 Attachment: Chart Distribution: 1 - DCI w/att 1 - DDCI w/att 1 - Exec. Dir. w/att 1 - SA/IA w/att -a! ER w/att 1 - DDI w/att 1 - DDO w/att 1 - C/NIC w/att 1 - VC/NIC (Meyer) w/att 1 - VC/NIC (Waterman) w/att 1 - DDI Registry w/att Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01101660069-5 Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01101660069-5 CONFIDENTIAL Att. to NIC 2689-83 POLITICALLY SIGNIFICANT INSURGENCIES Admittedly this chart oversimplifies the complex local issues at stake in these conflicts by putting them in solely east-west terms, but is used for illustrative purposes. Winner Nicaragua Anti-Western Guerrillas Anti-Leftist Regime Guerrillas Angola is " it Mozambique Vietnam If Cambodia it It 11 Laos If " If it " Zimbabwe it If If 11 Oman " If " If Regime PLO/Israel If If If If Iraq/Kurds Anti-Leftist Guerrillas Anti-Western Regime " 1983 Winner *Nicaragua Anti-Leftist Guerrillas Anti-Western Regime ? *Angola If ? *Mozambique If " If If ? *Afghanistan If If If *Kampuchea If " It Regime *Ethiopia/Eritrea If If if It ? El Salvador Anti-Western Guerrillas Anti-Leftist Regime ? Guatemala If If " ? Namibia If ? North Yemen If Regime it Is Western Sahara PLO/Israel If II *Leftist takeover in 1970s 1973 Approved For Release 2008/04/18: CIA-RDP85M00364RO01101660069-5