SPEEDING UP THE ESTIMATES
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP85T00153R000300010003-5
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date:
January 23, 2008
Sequence Number:
3
Case Number:
Publication Date:
May 26, 1982
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 97.08 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2008/01/23: CIA-RDP85TO0153R000300010003-5
26 May 1982
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
FROM: Herbert E. Meyer
SUBJECT: Speeding Up the Estimates
1. Your comments at the close of Tuesday's NFIB meeting--about the need
to produce more estimates in less time--struck a very familiar chord. Three
years ago, when we converted FORTUNE from a monthly into a bi-weekly, we
grappled with precisely this issue. What follows are some thoughts, based
on that experience, about speeding up the estimate process.
2. The first point to make is one that I suspect is already obvious to
you: it can be done. Indeed, it can be done more easily, and with less fuss,
than most participants realize. Sure it would be nice to have more manpower.
But there is much we can do with what we've got right now. The solution lies
not so much in working harder or faster, but rather in working differently.
3. The most important change we need to make is in our very approach
to estimates. Here the FORTUNE analogy is especially apt. In the old days,
we tended to approach each article with hushed reverence, as though we were
carving our immortal thoughts in stone. Our pace was stately, and we equated
undue speed with sloppiness and even corner-cutting. We always swung for the
bleachers; it never occurred to us that a ground ball up the middle could also
be useful. (A bunt was beneath contempt.) It took us a while to accept the
idea that different responses were appropriate to different subjects--and that
timeliness is often more important to the customers than depth. Once this idea
took hold, a lot of my colleagues were astonished to discover that timeliness
and depth is not all that difficult a combination to achieve.
4. The technical solution we developed at FORTUNE--to cease publishing
only 6,000-word blockbusters and to offer the reader a combination of block-
busters, two-page fast-closers, four-page specials, and so on--is a solution
we might also adopt. Indeed, we are already moving in this direction with
increased use of the SNIE and IIM formats. Perhaps we could develop one or two
additional formats. At FORTUNE, resistance to new formats was based on a fear
that shorter pieces would carry less weight with readers. The key management
decision was to keep our standards high so that readers would trust the new
formats simply because FORTUNE approved them. Our readers loved the new formats,
and staff fears eventually evaporated.
5. The trick to producing shorter pieces in less time is to focus them
precisely from the start. As Ambrose Bierce once began a letter, "My apologies
for writing a long letter; I haven't got time to write a short one." We will
need to take time up front to start off in a direction that will get us to our
destination by the most direct route. This will save an awful lot of time in
the final stages of coordination. We can no longer afford the luxury of
plunging ahead on the assumption that at some point along the way a focus
will emerge.
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2008/01/23: CIA-RDP85TO0153R000300010003-5
Approved For Release 2008/01/23: CIA-RDP85TO0153R000300010003-5
6. If our objective is to pick up speed, we will need to review the
entire estimates process to discover just where we are slowing down
unnecessarily. At Tuesday's NFIB meeting you suggested that such meetings
might need to be held more often. Other changes may be equally effective in
shortening what seems to be a huge time lag between completion of a draft
and final sign-off. (One effect of this lag is to render some estimates
out-of-date by the time our customers receive them. For instance, there is
no reason our estimate on the European Peace Movement should not include
mention of the recent conference Billy Graham attended with European clergymen.
All our readers have heard about it, and will be wondering where it fits in.)
7. For any publication process to work smoothly, certain events must
happen at certain times and in a certain sequence. As the process speeds up,
tolerance of bottlenecks declines sharply. Indeed, the decline in tolerance
is greater than the increase in speed. Hence tight management becomes
especially crucial.
8. Again, I say all this can be accomplished without any increase of
manpower. If the FORTUNE experience is a useful guide--and I believe it is--
two years from now we'll all look back on the old way and wonder why in hell
we didn't change it sooner.
Herbert E. Meyer
2
CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2008/01/23: CIA-RDP85TO0153R000300010003-5