DAILY SUMMARY OF POSITIONS ON INF

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 13, 2010
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 28, 1983
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5.pdf144.59 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5 28 January 1983 Daily Summary of Positions on INF West European media continue to dissect US statements on arms control issues. French Gaullist leader Chirac expounds on the role of French nuclear s stems in the Geneva talks. Moscow claims it is willing to scrap over 12 SS-ZOs. UK Most British papers reported that President Reagan will be flexible in -'- the Geneva talks, with the pro-Tory Daily_Mail quoting "White House aides" to this effect. The media nearly unanimously predict that the talks would mark time until after the West German elections, and that an eventual settlement probably would involve limited deployments on both sides. The Times editorialized that the Soviet offer to restrict deployment of SS-20s to the same number as British and French nuclear forces is "the worst of all possible solutions," and noted that talks along those lines should be in START--with London at the negotiating table. West Kohl, in an interview Wednesday, warned the SPD against claiming German that he had promised INF deployment in West Germany Sven if the other West European countries refused. Kohl remarked that the SPD should decide carefully whether it wants to inject the missile issue into the election campaign. The PD's Egon Bahr is quoted by the press as indicating that his party would view a reduction of Soviet INF weapons to the 1975 or 1976 level as a sufficient reason for not tits deploying US i47s? ldslatt42npepcentthe CD~_ PD h I st T o n o he S ercent down one po P France Lem notes that "it is clear ~hetresultsgofnthenWestPGermane from its European allies and whatever elections, will be led to abandon its 'zero option' to explore other avenues as Nitze just indicated." The'pro-Socialist daily Le Mat in uecently~~noted that the Vice President will have to explain U~-. signals on INF to a "perplexed European public." That daily adds, "It remains to be seen whose influence will carry the day in the White House: that of moderate Republicans or that of the conservative friends of Senator Helms, who has just obtained the head of Eugene Rostow." Chirac told US Embassy officials on Tuesday that he believed French nuclear systems "could be counted in the future under START negotiations." He added, however, that this did not mean that French forces Nould be reduced. He also restated his support for INF deployments and his opposition to including French systems in any INF aye ~ti..... Canment: Par s, orrever, has consistently avoided even a vague reference to hypothetical French participation in START. The government's stand probably is dictated by at least two concerns: French participation in START could lead to increased Soviet pressures to limit French force modernization; if its forces are included in overall Western force ceilings, France could come under US pressure to abilities f US . cap reduce its forces, in order to permit enlargement o EUR M 83-10037c ~~ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5 Italy Netherlands The Italian press is beginning to emphasize the need for quick agreement in Geneva and continues to highlight flexibility as the key to success. The centrist newspaper Corriere Della Sera notes that without immediate results, the USSR must either become tougher or run the risk of negotiating after the Pershing II is deployed. The Socialist paper Avanti declared that "time is of the essence" and that "it is necessary to submit an honest proposal to the Soviets that could bring about an agreement" to quell West Euro can fears of nuclear war and to counter Soviet propaganda cause" behind the European peace movement and claimed that the zero option was forced on Western Europe by Washington. The editorial concluded that NATO is not suffering from a public relations crisis e o s ran ~n a recent editorial, cited US policy as the "main but from bad political management. Belgium Ambassador Price reports that Foreign Minister Tindemans was delighted that the European Repair Facility for GLCMs will be sited in Belgium, noting that "this will be very helpful, very helpful." Tindemans argued that NATO should stick with the zero option, so far as the Allies goal for the INF talks at Geneva is concerned. He said that any move off that position will open an avenue for an avalanche of so- called "compromise" and "necessary concessions." Tindemans emphasized to Price later that to maintain credibility it would be essential that consultation with the allies take place prior to any US shift from the zero option, even if the shift is to a step-by-step approach that retains the option as an ultimate goal. USSR An unsigned editorial in yesterday's Soviet Russia reiterates General .Secretary Andropov's December proposal to dismant a hundreds of Soviet missiles, "including more than one dozen SS-20s." The paper also criticized the "latest statements from the Reagan Administration," as indicating that the US still clings to the zero option. Comment: Soviet press spokesmen this past month have argue a e pen~u~um of public opinion in Western Europe and in the US has perceptibly swung to the left. Soviet press commentaries can be expected to continue their harsh line. 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/11 :CIA-RDP85T00287R000500790008-5