CUBA: THE REVOLUTION MATURES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
20
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 20, 2002
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 15, 1975
Content Type: 
IM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6.pdf1016.33 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Confidential Intelligence Memorandum Cuba: The Revolution Matures Confidential -I -31 April 15, 1975 No. 0090/75 Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 25X1 Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Releasec602/D5/fPF&-R 45T00353R000100160003-6 Summary April 15, 1975 The 16-year-old Castro regime has entered a new and significant level of political development characterized by growing Soviet influence, the rejection of the utopian schemes that once overburdened the economy, a more pragmatic attitude in domestic and foreign policy, the reorganization of virtually the entire ruling struc- ture, and movement toward joint as opposed to individual--leadership. The revolu- tion has matured in no small part because of the emergence as Castro's chief advisers of a small faction of pre-revolutionary communists who have displaced some of the "Fidelistas" -an elite made up mainly of Fidel and Raul Castro's comrades-in-arms from the guerrilla warfare days of 1957-58. At the end of the last decade, Castro was at last persuaded of the need for a change in direction by a number of factors: ? His administration had reached the nadir of its popularity. ? He faced Soviet pressure, isolation in the international arena, and economic brankruptcy. ? His problems were peaking at the very time his political maneuverability had neared its lower limits. Alienation of the US and heavy dependence on massive external assistance had left him little alternative but to submit to the "advice" of the USSR and of those in Cuba who most closely reflected Soviet points of view. This "advice," the accept- ance of which was presumably a condition of continued high levels of Soviet aid, included an insistence that Castro put his house in order so that the aid would not be wasted. He immediately set about doing so despite the realization that such institutional mechanisms as national elections, a constitution, and a party congress will build some checks and balances into the system that he has completely dominated. At the regime's uppermost level, members of the two main political factions have differing opinions on a broad range of matters. Despite this divergence, however, the only significant minority in the leadership- the "old" communist faction-is now being permitted a major role in shaping policy. This minority can be Comments and queries on the contents of this publication are welcome. They may be directed to 25X1 A f the Office of Current Intelligence, CONFIDENTIAL 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Relea gCDEPM1OENIPIib 85T00353R000100160003-6 expected to try to capitalize on this belated recognition of its skills by solidifying its gains and expanding its influence even further. The institutionalization process appears to be the embodiment of that effort. There is no reason to believe, however, that Castro is losing control or that a power struggle is in the making. He is aware that basic changes in his flamboyant style of rule are required, and he is willing to accept them as long as they do not threaten his real sources of power--his control of the military and security forces, and his magnetic hold on the Cuban masses. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Release 1O jJNf CIFIQ$J00353R000100160003-6 Factions Within the Leadership The Cuban leadership today is made up primarily of the guerrilla faction of the defunct July 26 Movement, the more flexible members of the "old" or pre-Castro communist party (the Popular Socialist Party), and a smattering of technicians and opportunists-some of whom had their origins in the pre-Castro Student Revolutionary Directorate-who are basically loyal to Fidel. Castro's guerrilla faction, which includes in its ranks a number of professional military officers jailed in the mid-1950s for anti-Batista activ- ities, has the backing of the armed forces and security service. It is the strongest in terms of naked power and also has the greatest representation on the party Central Committee and other organizations. It is this strength that for more than a decade gave Fidel the clear authority to indulge his penchant for making most decisions himself. In the wake of the political and economic problems arising from the attempt to produce ten million tons of sugar in the 1970 harvest, however, Castro realized the need for a fundamental change in his style of governing. For lack of alternatives, he turned to "old" communists such as Carlos Rafael Rodriguez and Blas Roca, whose advice he had spurned for so long but whose credibility with Cuba's Soviet patrons was of supreme impor- tance. Since 1970, therefore, the "old" communist faction, because of its affiliation with Moscow and the superior organizational skills of its members, has gained influence out of all proportion to its representation in the top offices of the party. None of its members, for instance, holds a seat in the Political Bureau. Moreover, the successes of the policies developed since 1970 for the Castro regime by Rodriguez and Roca (in close cooperation with Moscow) stand out in vivid contrast to the failures of the policies of the pre-1970 era, when the guerrilla elite rubber-stamped Fidel's decisions. Steady economic improvement has strengthened the ascendancy of what is in fact, a minority faction in the leadership. Thus, the guerrilla elite maintains its grasp on the power structure, while the weaker "old" communist faction is pre-eminent in the policy-making field. The key to this paradoxical relationship is Castro. As long as he sees no threat to his own position in using the "old" communists as a source of technical and administrative skills, the "Fidelistas" will accept his judgment and permit the paradox to continue. Neither the fanatical anti-communists of the July 26 Movement nor the die-hard anti-Fidelistas of the original communist party are around to fan the flames of friction, and both elements of the regime's leadership now find it convenient to stress their similarities rather than their differences. -1- CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Release jWfDLW 12Q)kgT00353R000100160003-6 CENTRAL COMMITTEE POLITICAL BUREAU THE CUBAN COMMUNIST' PARTY irr el CASTRO- Firl Sceiviary Raul CASTRO- Sec,rnl Secretary Occcddo Dorticos Sergio del Valle Icon Almeida Guillermo Garcia Fidel CASTRO--Chi ral Raul CASTRO- DeI ity Chaman tJsvnldo DORTICOS Carlos Rafael RODRIGUEZ Antonio PEREZ Isidoro MALMIERCA Icrge RISQUET Raul GARCIA Jose ABRANTES Rogelio ACEVEDO Armando ACOSTA Severn AGUIRRE luau ALMEIDA lose M. ALVAREZ Emilio ARAGONES lose ARTEAGA Flavin BRAVO Julio E. CAMACHO inc CARRERAS IE-rne;to CASILLAS Belarmino CASTILLA Fidel CASTRO Raul CASTRO Angel Joel CHAVECO Faure CHOMON Osmoni CIENFUEGOS Leopoldo CINTRAS Abelardo COLOME Raul CURBELO Sergio DEL VALLE Manuel DIAZ Joel DOMENECH Osvaldo DORTICOS Victor E. DREKE Vilma ESPIN Manuel E FAJARDO Marcelo FERNANDEZ Oscar FERNANDEZ Harold FERRER Calixto GARCIA Guillermo GARCIA Julio A. GARCIA Pedro M. GARCIA Raul GARCIA Elena GIL Fabio GROBART Orestes GUERRA Raul GUERRA Secundino GUERRA Armando HART Joel IGLESIAS Omar H. ISER Rienerio JIMENEZ Rolando KINDELAN Jose LLANUSA Antonio E LUSSOt+ Manuel LUZARDO Jose R. MACHADO Isidoro MALMIERCA Juan MARINELLO Miguel MARTIN Joaquin MENDEZ Raul MENDENDEZ Arnaldo MILIAN Carlos MIR Pedro MIRET Jesus MONTANE Jose NARANJO Arnaldo OCHOA Mario OLIVA Filiberto OLI VLRA Ramon PARDO Antonio PEREZ Faustino PEREZ Waltredo PEREZ Manuel PINEIRO Lizardo PROENZA PINAR DEL RIO-Julio E. CAMACHO HAVANA-Jose R. MACHADO MATANZAS-Julian RIZO Ramiro Valdes Armando Hart Blas ROCA Pedro MIRET Faure CHOMON Jose RAMIREZ Jorge RISQUET Raul ROA Bias ROCA Carlos Rafael RODRIGUEZ Orlando RODRIGUEZ Basilic; RODRIGUEZ Ursinio ROJAS Celia SANCHEZ Aldo SANTAMARIA Haydee SANTAMARIA Rene de los SANTOS Clementina SERRA Jose R. SILVA L onel SOTO J> Ilo TARRAU Diodes TORRALBA Felipe TORRES Ramiro VALDES Anibal VELAZ Roberto VIERA Liis A. ZAYAS LAS VILLAS-Arnaldo MILIAN CAMAGIJEY-Raul CURBELO ORIENTE -Armando HART CONFIDENTIAL Military Department American Department Afro-Asian Department I rrrnsnortation and Communication Department Genercd Foreign Relations Department Education. Science. Culture Deparment Juridical iced State O-ganisms Department Jrganization Department Agricu ture and Livestock Department Heavy Industries Department `Sugar Department Economy Department Consumption and Services Department Mcss Organiz rions Department Central CJrganization! Service Department 7p0roved For Release 01 0 /0 %07 : CIA-RDPRiM 353ROO01 001 60,03- Approved For Releas '$]OR4)EOMDVt5T00353R000100160003-6 The goals of the two factions coincide, at least in the short term, and the guerrilla faction realizes that the present symbiosis is contributing much more to the achievement of these goals than did the pre-1970 relationship. In short, the policies of the communists of the pre-revolutionary era are providing the regime with a much more stable economic and organizational base, and, as long as no attempt is made to weaken Castro's position, the guerrilla faction will continue cooperating and will cede responsibility for a broad range of decision-making. Should Castro decide, however, that the "old" communists are mount- ing a challenge to his overall leadership, neither he nor the guerrilla elite would allow the situation to continue. In such an event, even the combina- tion of his need for their expertise, Moscow's certain displeasure, and the threat to continued economic stability would not be sufficient to deter him from attempting to reverse the trend, by force if necessary. Much would depend on the nature of the threat. Anything approaching "a clear and present danger" to his control of the military, for example, would obviously provoke swift remedial action. A gradual process, in which the erosion of his power is almost imperceptible, would be more difficult for him to handle. He would be likely to allow the process to simmer, depending heavily on his proven ability to outmaneuver his opponents through political stratagems, and would resort to armed force only if all else fails. Castro's ability to command the continued loyalty of the armed forces and the security service stems from placing members of the guerrilla elite in all key positions in the chains of command. No "old" communist, for example, has held a strategic position in the military structure since 1964. Moreover, both Fidel and Armed Forces Minister Raul Castro, Cuba's undis- puted number-two man, have made a point of identifying themselves with the new class of professional officers who are too young to have participated in the war against Batista but in whose hands the control of important military units will eventually lie. The Castros' hold on the nation's armed might, therefore, seems secure should a showdown develop. For the most part, the guerrilla elite continues to look with suspicion on the "old" communists, a suspicion dating to the late 1950s. With the exception of one small communist guerrilla unit whose members took to the hills of their own volition in mid-1958 to avoid piecemeal liquidation at the hands of the local police, the communists avoided the path taken by Castro's insurgent forces until it became clear in late 1958 that the guerrillas had Batista on the defensive. The guerrillas- especially Raul Castro-did maintain some contact with the Communist Party, but if communists joined guerrilla ranks it was usually because of personal conviction rather than as a result of CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Release Z O h]TD!]NRJ J00353R000100160003-6 party orders. At times, the party even acted in a manner detrimental to the guerrillas' success and publicly ridiculed guerrilla warfare on theoretical grounds as an inappropriate way to achieve power. This history, plus the communists' links with Moscow as opposed to the guerrillas' intense nation- alism, constitutes the basis for the gap separating the two groups. Cuba's relationships with Moscow and with the US are two key poin-s where friction could undermine the present cooperation in the leadership. The guerrilla elite, for example, prefers to be as independent of Moscow as of Washington. It has endured Cuba's drift deep into the Soviet orbit only because of economic realities and because it fears Soviet patronage less than it fears US military intervention. Cuba's proximity to the US, the concept of super powers' spheres of influence, and past US interventions in the Carib- bean have shaped the thinking of the faction's leaders to a degree approach- ing paranoia. The entire adult life of most of these relatively young and impression- able officials has been spent in the shadow of what they see as aggressive US military, paramilitary, and economic action. Experience has led them to believe that the US has always been hostile. To a lar,-ee extent, their view of the US is governed by the support Washington provided to Batista during the guerrillas' campaign, by its participation in the Bay cf Pigs invasion, and by its subsequent efforts to bring down the revolution by diplomatic and economic means. As a result, they have dragged their feet on the nolicy of detente with Washington urged by Moscow and the "old" communists. Despite the greatly increased influence of the minority faction since 1970, it was not until Leonid Brezhnev's visit to Cuba in January-February 1974 that the Castro regime ventured beyond mere lip service to detente. The 1962 missile crisis taught the guerrilla elite that Cuba is not vital to Soviet interests and that the Castro regime, in Soviet eyes. is expendable in the crunch of Big Power politics. In finally agreeing to pursue detente, Havana is gambling tha- eventual access to US trade and technology outweighs the risks involved in drawing closer to a government that, in the elite's opinion, has so far offered only unrelenting hostility. Detente also offers a chance to develop a counterbalance to Soviet pressure an option that has been absent from Castro's political arsenal for some time. If possible, Castro would like to shift his economic reliance to a less demanding benefactor. His guarded but persistent criticism of the failure of the oil-producing countries to assist developing nations suggests that he Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 -4- CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release((S.JQ70h{P 5T00353R000100160003-6 would prefer straight economic ties with a rich oil producer to Cuba's complex relationship with the USSR. But the next best alternative is to play one super power against the other in an effort to achieve as much independ- ence as possible. Attempting to develop a balance between super powers, of course, would also entail. a continuation of warm ties with Moscow, an arrangement the guerrilla elite would continue to suffer. The members of the elite may detest the almost overwhelming Soviet influence in Cuba's internal affairs, but at the same time they realize that, short of all-out war, the USSR is Cuba's best insurance against the US. Until they are convinced that the US is no longer a threat, they will look to Moscow for military backing no matter what their relationships are in the economic sphere. The "old" communists, on the other hand, look for an ever closer association with Moscow and view detente as an extension of Soviet policy that will allow other countries to bear some of the onerous economic burden that Cuba has become for the USSR. The willingness of the members of the Rodriguez-Roca group to urge detente on Castro suggests that they, and Moscow as well, are extremely confident in the security of their position and expect to continue exerting a major influence on Cuban policy. The minor- ity faction will attempt to use the institutionalization process to increase its representation in the regime's leadership to the point where Castro's acquies- cence is no longer needed to guarantee the acceptance of its policies. The "old" communists know well his mercurial nature, however, and realize how easily he can turn against them. They have not forgotten the purges in 1962 and 1968, and they are aware of how vulnerable they are as a minority without a true power base. This does not mean that there is anything resembling a power struggle in Havana today, or that the "old" communists want Castro replaced in the near term. For one, he is much too valuable to them as a head of government who still enjoys unparalleled popularity with the masses. Moreover, he has shown that cooperation between the "old" communists and the guerrilla faction is not only possible but is mutually rewarding, and that there are circumstances in which he will allow the "old" communists unprecedented authority and responsibility. Other Areas of Divergence The "old" communists would vigorously reject any attempt by Castro to resurrect the exportation of revolution except in those specific times and places where it might parallel Soviet policy. They look upon the Cuban guerrilla experience as a case in which fortuitous circumstances allowed a CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 2002/05/07 : CIA-RDP85T00353R000100160003-6 Approved For Release :(Ofq/jQWYDP?qFffAtT00353ROO01 00160003-6 group of armed rebels to win out for all the wrone reasons. Some of the ex-guerrillas, on the other hand, still look upon direct action as the most efficient means of achieving their goals and have ?'ittle time for esoteric theory. But the success of the present diplomatic approach in the very arena where the violent approach failed seems to have convinced them that indiscriminate violence is generally counterproductive as a foreign policy tool. The majority of the guerrilla elite also seems to have been convinced that the domestic policies of the "Guevaraists"-tho::>e among their number who championed the naive economic and ideological concepts of Ole Guevara-were unsound, given Cuba's rudimentary stage of socialist political development. Thus, the earlier stress on moral incentives and calls for the elimination of the use of money have fallen victim to the less colorful bt.t more realistic theories of the "old" communists, w',o gauged much more accurately the degree of political consciousness-and- thus, the motivational susceptibility --ofthe Cuban people. A more sensitive area of disagreement involves C.rba's relations with the Communist parties of Latin America. Here, too, the g _ierrilla elite has draw n back from its radical position of hostility and n,rw accepts the "old" communists desire to repair interparty relations in the hemisphere. The restoration of ties is probably largely cosmetic, however, at least insofar as the guerrilla faction is concerned. The failure of thc Bolivian Communist Party to support the Che Guevara operation in 196". the abandonment of the guerrilla struggle by the Venezuelan Communist Party earlier in the same decade, and similar if less spectacular examples of alleged party perfidy, elsewhere in the hemisphere have Left a residue of ill will that Castro and his coterie are not about to sweep under the rug. no matter what steps may be taken over the short term to achieve mutual tactical advantage. For their part, the Latin American communists ,eem well disposed to maintain the cordial relations- particularly with Cuba's "old" communists- that have been built up with Havana over the last six years. They are unlikely, however, to forget, or forgive, Castro's bitter public denunciations of them for allegedly abandoning their political ideals in exchange for personal comfort, and of confining their political acti,,_ty to such safe areas as pamphleteering and armchair criticism of those who chose the path of action. Modest interparty cooperation is likely to continue, but the relation- ship is a brittle one that cannot be subjected to much strain. Aware of th