TRENDS IN COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
37
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 7, 1999
Sequence Number: 
44
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 28, 1971
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3.pdf1.85 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Confidential IIIIII~~~~~~~~~IIIIIIIII FOREIGN BROADCAST INFORMATION SERVICE in Communist Propaganda Confidential 28 OCTOEER 1971 (VOL. XXII, NO. 43) Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL This propaganda analysis report is based ex- clusively on material carried in communist broadcast and press media. It is published by FBIS without coordination with other U.S. Government components. WARNING This document contains information affecting the national defense of the United States, within the meaning of Title 18, sections 793 and 794, of the US Code, as amended. Its transmission or revelation of its contents to or receipt by an unauthorized person is pro- hibited by law. wour I [.eluded here euleet If dereei0 sad deies t1#416611066. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 CONTENTS Topics and Events Given Major Attention i PRC IN UNITED NATIONS Peking Sees Vote as Victory Over U.S. "Two-Chinas Scheme" . . . 1 SING-U.S. RELATIONS Peking Says Nixon Visit Arrangements "Are Proceeding Well". . . 5 INDOCHINA North Korean Party-Government Delegation Welcomed-in Hanoi . . 9 Brezhnev in France Warns of Intrigues Against the Vietnamese . 12 DRV Deprecates President's Radio Talk, Hails Antiwar Forces . . 13 Paris Talks: Communist Media Continue Cursory Attention . . . 14 DRV Spokesman, Comment Rap U.S. Raids ii DMZ, North Vietnam . . 14 Moscow Registers Concern Over Indo-Pakistani Situation . . . . 16 Media Report on Refugees, Heightened Border Tensions . . . . . 18 KOSYGIN IN CANADA Increased Soviet-Canadian Economic Cooperation Stressed . . . . 20 KOSYGIN IN CUBA Warm Havana Welcome for Premier Reflects Cordial Relations . . 24 SINO-KOREAN RELATIONS Anniversary of CPV Entry into Korean War Marked in DPRK, PRC . 27 EASTERN EUROPE Soviet Bloc-Yugoslav Contacts Multiply Since Brezhnev Visit . . 30 Moscow, Prague Show Sensitivity on Yugoslav Maneuvers . . . . . 31 ? Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 Moscow (3048 items) Peking (1545 items) Kosygin in Canada (0.2%) 13% Domestic Issues (33%) 40% October Revolution (1%) 6% Indochina (20%) 7% Anniversary South Korean Student (0.3%) 6% Slogans Soviet Students Rally (--) 6% Movement 2d Anniversary Somali (--) 5% [Brezhnev Speech (--) 4%] Revolution In"ochina (5%) 3% 7th Summit Conference (--) 4% U.S. Zionists' Anti- (--) 3% of East & Central Soviet Campaign China (3%) 2% African Countries Kekkonen in USSR (--) 2% Middle East (1%) 2% These statistics are based on the voicecast commentary output of the Mop??cw and Peking domestic and international radio services. The term "commentary" is used to denote the lengthy item-radio talk, speech, press article or editorial, govern- ment or party statement, or diplomatic note. Items of extensive reportage are counted as commentaries. Figures in parentheses indicate volume of comment during the preceding week. Topics and events given major attention in terms of volume are not always discussed in the body of the Trends. Some may have been covered in prior issues; in other cases the propaganda conten' may be routine or of minor significance. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 PRC IN UNITED NATIONS Peking's initial reaction to the 25 October UN vote on the seating of the PRC came on the 26th in a speech by Acting Foreign Minister Chi Peng-fei, who on the same day had seen off Henry Kissinger at the conclusion of the latter's six-day visit. That the Chinese were willing to keep the UN representation issue separate from the plans for President Nixon's visit seemed indicated by the timing of the second Kissinger visit and by Peking's failure to link the U.S. position on the UN question with Sino-U.S. relations generally. Initial PRC comment has viewed the UN vote as a "significant victory" in foiling U.S. efforts to bring about dual Chinese representation in Lne world body. Peking has not taken the occasion to assess Washington's China policy in a broader context. in the only reference to President Nixon, a 26 October NCNA report cited the Western press as saying that the President personally wrote to many heads of state in behalf of "the 'two-Chinas' scheme." Peking's -action to the vote was foreshadowed in earlier authori- tative comment stressing firm opposition to any dual representation formula. A foreign ministry statement on 20 August and a PEOPLE'S DAILY Commentator article on 25 September, declaring categorically that the PRC would have nothing to do with the United Nations unless Chiang Kai-shek's representatives were expelled, were confined to the narrow issue of UN representation. The Commentator article claimed that the U.S. resolutions aimed at dual representa- tion reflected persisting U.S. hostility toward the Chinese, but no implications were drawn for Sino-U.S. relations. Similarly, comment on the vote has avoided broader issues involving the two countries and has pulled its polemical punches directed at the Nixon Administration. In contrast, a PEOPLE'S DAILY editorial on the vote lashed Japan's "reactiu.L.3ry Sato government" for baring "its ugly features in remaining stubbornly hostile towards the Chinese people." PEKING SEES VOTE AS VICTORY OVER U.S. 'n'.0-CHINAS SCHEME" The first monitored PRC reaction to the 25 October General Assembly vote appeared in an NCNA dispatch on the 26th singling out comment on the vote made by Acting Foreign Minister Chi Peng-fei at an Iranian embassy reception. Chi hailed the favorable vote as a "victory of the people of the whole world" and a demonstration of the "bankruptcy" of the policy long pursued by "U.S. imperialism." Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 According to the NCNA account. Chi said the Chinese government and people were grateful to Al:lania, Algeria, and the other 21 nations which had sponsored the resolution restoring the PRC's rights in the United Nationb, to those countries which have diplomatic relations with the PRC, and to "other friendly countries" which have "upheld justice." The NCNA account of the reception did not include Chi's remarks to correspondents-- reported in the Western press on the 27th--that the PRC was giving consideration to the question of when it would take its seat in the United Nations. Following NCNA's brief report of Chi's remarks, the first substantial comment came in a lengthy, heavily editorialized NCNA dispatch dated the 26th and carried in both domestic and international services. On the 28th a PEOPLE'S DAILY editorial discussed the Assembly vote,* echoing Chi and the NCNA dispatch in calling the outcome a victory for the people of the world and a demonstration of the bankruptcy of U.S. policy. Both the PEOPLE'S DAILY editorial and NCNA were critical of the United States and the "Sato government" for engaging in "tricks" to gain support in the Assembly for a two-Chinas "scheme," with NCNA derisively observing that U.S. and Japanese representatives during the week-long debate "were running hither and thither, just like ants on a hot pan, to exert pressure and to deceive and woo" other delegations. The NCNA dispatch cited Western press reports as saying that President Nixon personally wrote to the heads of many states, that Secretary Rogers and Ambassador Bush "rustled" around with promises of U.S. favors or hints of withdrawal of U.S. aid, and that U.S. senators had threatened that Washington would reduce its funds to the world body if the Albanian resolution were adopted. Japan also dispatched "important personages to join its UN delegation and coordinated with the United States in its vote-seeking effort," according to NCNA, The NCNA dispatch--which noted that the final vote was welcomed with "cheers" and "prolonged warm applause"--drew on U.S. news reports for the statements that the Administration was "caught * In the three previous years, Peking's comment on the voting on the representation issue had been conveyed in heavily editorialized NCNA dispatches. The 1967 vote occasioned a PEOPLE'S DAILY Commentator article, and the votes in 1965 and 1966 were discussed In PEOPLE'S DAILY editorials. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 by surprise" and "expressed strong disappointment." And like the PEOPLE'S DAILY editorial, NCNA said that the U.S. press has called the vote the "worst U.S. defeat in UN history." NCNA added that Ambassador Bush, in a statement after the vote, said "despondently that this is a 'moment of infamy,"' at the same time admitting that the votes which have been cast "represent the views of the majority of UN members." On the 27th NCNA transmitted the text of the Albanian resolution, listing the 76 nations which voted for it while singling out only the United States and Japan among the 35 that voted against it. The same NCNA transmission listed the 59 states voting against the "important question" resolution "concocted by the United States in collusion with the Sato government of Japan." OTHER COMMUNIST Moscow has welcomed the outcome of the COMMENT 25 October vote in a moderate volume of comment calling it a step toward realism, at the same time assailing Washington's "arm-twisting" methods and pointing to consistent Soviet support over the years for seating the PRC in the United Nations. The most authoritative commentary to date is a PRAVDA article on the 28th by Viktor Sokolov, which said tat the seating of the PRC and expulsion of the Chiang Kai-shek representatives .ie "linked with the hope that the United Nations will be more effectively carrying into life the principles of its charter." The article replayed the pervasive theme that the USSR has consistently pressed for restoration of the PRC's rights in the organ.'zation, "whatever the state of relations with the Chinese leadership." A foreign-language radio commentary by Yuriy Soltan on the 26th had paraphrased, without attribution, Soviet Ambassador Malik's remarks during the debate to the effect that the Soviet Union supported the seating of the PRC even though Soviet relations with the Chinese leadership have at times assumed "a sharply ideological and political character." A substantial body of comment by Moscow's East European allies has also stressed the bloc's long-standing support of Peking's seating and assails the U.S. maneuvers on the representation issue. Some of the comment has gone beyond Moscow's in pointing up the new responsibility now resting on Peking. Thus an article in Warsaw's TRYBUNA LUDU on the 27th expressed hope that the PRC representatives will join with the socialist and other peace-loving states in solving complicated international problems. It should be expected that Chinese diplomacy will bring a constructive cor"r.ibution to the world body, the article sa-td, adding that it is further hoped that Peking will cooperate in the checking of the arms race, in the discontinuation of nuclear tests, and in the nonproliferation of ApprdWf P6r (ease 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 Similar East German comment has also predictably taken the occasion to call for admission to the United Nations of those states which are being kept out due to the policy of "discrimina-- tion" pursued by the United States. Bucharest's press and radio have hailed the vote as an expression of justice and political r?al:.sm, and a congratulatory message on the 26th from Ceausescu and Maurer to Mao Tse-tung and Chou En-lai cites the vote as supporting the Romanian line that a lasting solution of major international problems cannot be conceived without the participation of the PRC. In addition to the Romanians, the Albanian a.td North Korean leaderships, Yugoslav Premier Bijedic, and Polish Premier Jaroszewicz have sent congratulatory messages to their Chinese counterparts. Lin Piao was not an addressee of any of these messages. The DRV's first reactiL_L came in a Hanoi domestic sexgice broadcast on the 28th which said public opinion in many countries regards the vote as a victory for the PRC and the peace-loving peoples of the world and "a disastrous setback for the U.S. imperialists." Citing AFP, the broadcast noted that Secretary Rogers in his 26 October press conference had declared that the expulsion of the RCC from the world body would not affect U.S. relations with the Chiang Kai-shek regime. No DRV congratulatory message has been monitored as of this writing. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 SING - U, S. RELATIONS PEKING SAYS NIXON VISIT ARRANGEMENTS "ARE PROCEEDING WELL" Conveying a sense of momentum in Sino-U.S. developments in the wake of the second Kissinger mission from 20 to 26 October, Peking announced on 28 October (afternoon of the 27th Washington time) that arrangements for President Nixon's visit "are proceed- ing well" and that another announcement is expected "in the near future." Unlike reports on the Kissinger delegation's arrival on the 20th, which were carried in the middle of Peking newcasts, the 28 October announcement was broadcast as the 1c=.ad item by the domestic radio. While predictably avoiding direct comment on the President's projected visit, Peking reported the second Kissinger mission in such a way as to signal that ongoing Sino-U.S. developments are not affected by the current internal anomalies in China. NCNA dispatches on 20 October, disseminated in both domestic and international services, reported Kissinger's arrival that day--to make "concrete arrangements" for the President's visit-- and his talks with Chou En-lai followed by a banquet on the same day "to entertain Dr. Kissinger and his party." To bring the point even further home to the Chinese people, and perhaps to recalc:.trant elements in the leadership, PEOPLE'S DAILY on the 21st carried two photographs of the U.S. delegation with Chou and other Chinese leaders. In addition to t1e premier, the Chinese officials at the announced talks on the 20th included Politburo member Yeh Chien- ying, vice chairman of the party's Military Affairs Committee, and Acting Foreign Minister Chi Peng-fei. Yeh, the ranking military leader currently appearing in public, and CH'_ met the Americans at the airport on their arrival and saw them off on the ?6th. In addition to the 28 October announcement, there were three Peking reports on the visit, covering the arrival, the talks and banquet on the 2Uth, and the departure. Apart from noting that the delegation came to the PRC to make arrangements for President Nixon's visit, there was no characterization of the atmosphere or the substance of the talks. Though there were no other specifications of when talks were held, the departure announcement noted that during "intervals between the talks" CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL IBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 the delegation "visited various pla.-.es" and attended a theatrical performance in Peking. Chou was not reported as making any other appearanrpa during the period of the delegation's stay.* SINO-SOVIET-U.S. The Chinese may have been pleased with the TRIANGLE timing of the Kissinger delegation's arrival coincident with the second anniversary-- unmarked by either Peking or Moscow--of the opening of the Sino- Soviet border t ks. In the course of the movement toward Sino- American negotiations, Peking has exhibited an awareness of the uses of this development for its position in the triangular relationship. This was reflected, for example, two months after the Sino-Soviet talks had opened at a time when both sides were leaking reports of difficulties in Vie border negotiations. Peking's announcement on 14 Decembe_ 1969 of the chief Soviet negotiator's departure for home--an announcement contrived to put pressure on Moscow to return the negotiator soon--was pointedly juxtaposed in the same NCNA international service transmission with a belated report (three days after the fact) of a meeting in Warsaw between the U.S. and PRC diplomatic representatives. That meeting led to the resumption, after a lengthy hiatus, of the Sino-U.S. ambassadorial talks running parallel with the protracted Sino-Soviet border talks. The Warsaw talks were suspended after the U.S. incursion into Cambodia in the spring of 1970, but there was new movement in Sino-U.S. relations following the Lam Son 719 operation in southern Laos in February-March this year and the emergence of what Peking began. calling an "unprecedentedly fine situation" in Indochina. After a series of developments ranging from the visit of American table tennis players to the PRC in April to the July announcement of President Nixon's forthcoming trip, Peking presented an analysis of its strategy as requiring maximum flexibility in distinguishing among its adversaries in order to isolate "the main enemy." By implication, Peking identified the Soviet Union as its principal antagonist and Justified its dealings with the United States on the basis of changes in U.S. * Chou appeared at an Iranian embassy reception on the evening of the 26th at which Chi Peng-fei offered Peking's initial comment on the UN vote. NCNA reported on the 27th that Chou had "a friendly talk w~'.th American friendly personage John S. Service" that day. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 COr IDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 policy that offered a counterbalance to the Soviets.* Thus Peking may have hoped that Moscow read the American delegation's arrival date as a reminder of the triangular facts of interna- tional life. SOVIET BLOC Moscow followed the Kissinger visit with brief COMMENT reports of the announced activities, but there has been no comment in the central media. A Radio Most w broadcast to China on 26 October, discussing the previous day's UN vote on seating the PRC, took note of Sino- U.S. developments in accusing Washington of hypocrisy in its China policy as evidenced by its efforts to develop contacts with Peking while maintaining its relationship with the Nation- alist Chinese regime. The day before Kissinger arrived in Peking, a broadcast to the Chinese contrasted what it portrayed as significant Soviet support for the PRC and Washington's hostility from the time that the PRC was founded. The broad- cast contained a rare reference to the moribund Sino-Soviet treaty of alliance, noting that economic and other support provided by the Soviets in line with the treaty enabled the PRC to overcome the Western economic blockade. In a notable allusion by a top Soviet leader to Sino-U.S. developments, Brezhnev took the occasion of a speech in Paris on the 27th to warn against attempts to impose a Vietnam settle- ment "by way of secret combinations behind the Vietnamese people's back."** Current Soviet comment has not spelled out implications of Sino-U.S. relations for third parties, but some East European comment has expressed misgivings over the effects of these developments. A 25 October commentary in Prague's RUDE PRAVO on the second Kissinger missicn explained that the "anti-imperialist forces" view these developments with disquiet because Washington undertook normalization of relations with the PRC out of consideration of the "schismatic and anti-Soviet orientation" of Peking policy. Nothing has changed in that respect, "as Kissinger has seen for himself with satisfaction," the commentary concluded. * Peking's analysis is discussed in the TRENDS of 18 August, pages 19-22. ** Brezhnev's remark is discussed in the Indochina section of the TRENDS. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 An article on 20 October in a minor Polish paper, DZIENNIK LUDOWY, a peasant organ, linked the anniversary of the opening of the Sino-Soviet border talks, the Kissinger mission, and Indochina in musing over the past two years' developments in Sino-Soviet re.ations. After discussing Sino-Soviet develop- ments, the article took note of Kissinger's arrival in Peking that day, an event "which gives one food for thought." Specifically, the article suggested the thought--which "must be uppermost in the minds of the Indochinese people"--of how more advantageous would be the position of the communist states vis-a-vis the imperialists if the Sino-Soviet talks :.ad pro- duced real progress. OTHER CONWIUNIST The second Kissinger visit has not been REACTION mentioned by Hanoi, which has never explicit- ly acknowledged Peking's invitation to the President while indirectly ca&tigating it, or by Pyongyang, which has endorsed Peking's invitation. Peking's Albanian ally briefly reported he Kissinger mission. In the wake of the original announcement on the President's visit, Tirana had taken the occasion of the anniversary of the 1954 Geneva agreements on 20 Tuly to warn that the Nixon Administration cannot be trusted and that the United States is "the main, the most perfidious, and * -= most ferocious enemy of the peoples." Havana has reported the Kissinger visit without comment. Some Cuban reports have noted that President Nixon plans to visit both Peking and Moscow. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 INDOCHINA In the wake of the 24-28 September visit of Li Hsien-nien's Chinese economic delegation and the 3-8 October visit of Soviet President Podgornyy. DRV leaders are currently playing host to a North Korean party-government delegation led by Politburo member and Vice Premier Pak Song-chol. References to DRV-DPRK solidarity and friendship pervade the propaganda, with no overt manifestation of their diametrically opposed reactions to Peking's invitation to President Nixcn--welcomed by Kim Il-song on 6 August as a "great victory" for the Chinese people and world revolutionary forces, at the time Hanoi in its vitriolic polemic was implying that the PRC had departed from a proletarian internationalist path. Soviet party chief Brezhnev at a Paris dinner for President Pompidou on 27 October made a thinly veiled allusion to possible Sino-U.S. collusion on Indochina when he warned that the problem cannot be solved "either by attempts to impose an alien will on Vietnam by means of force or by way of secret combinations behind the backs of the Vietnamese people." Brezhnev again pledged Soviet support so long as the Indochinese struggle continues. And Moscow broadcasts continue to cir.e President Podgornyy's visit to Hanoi, during which the annual Soviet-DRV aid agreements were signed, as testimony of the UOSR's unabated loyalty to the DRV and the national liberation movement. U.S. failure to respond positively to the PRG's 1 July proposal and to totally withdraw from South Vietnam continues to be scored by the Vietnamese comiunist delegates at Paris as well as in routine propaganda And a Hanoi radio talk characterizes the President's remarks on ending the war, in his 24 October radio talk marking Veterans Day, as "flowery words" aimed at deceiving American and world opinion. NORTH KOREAN PARTY-GOVERNMENT DELEGATION WELCOMED IN HANOI Pyongyang media gave no advance notice concerning the visit to the DRV of a party-government delegation. On 24 October, the day of the delegation's departure, KCNA reported that in response to the invitation of the C+-ntral Committee of the VWP and the DRV Government, a six-man party-government delegation headed by Pak Song-chol, Politburo member and second vice premier, departed Pyongyang for a "friendship visit to the DRV." Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 NCNA reported the dame day that the delegation briefly stopped at the Peking airport, where they were met by Politburo member Li Hsien-nien who hosted lunch. Later on the 24th the delegation was welcomed at the Hanoi airport by a Vietnamese delegation headed by Nguyen Duy Trinh, Politburo member and Foreign Affairs Minister. An evening banquet featured speeches by Trinh and Pak with Premier Pham Van Dong in attendance. Premier Dong participated in official talks with the delegation on Lhe 25th and 26th. VNA portrayed the talks as having proceeded "in an atmosphere of sincerity, militant solidarity, and fraternal friendship." A "grand meeting" to welcome the DPRK delegation was held by the "Hanoi population" on 25 Jctober at a local meeting hall. Trinh, who headed the Vietnamese turnout, stressed the theme that "Vietnam and Korea share the same plight of temporary division of the country, are facing up to the same enemy--the U.S. imperialist aggressors--and share the same ideal of socialism and communism." Activities of the DPRK delegation on the 26th included attendance at an art performance hosted by the culture ministry, wreath-laying ceremonies at the Hanoi monument to war dead, and a visit to Ho Chi Minh's home. PROLETARIAN Foreign Minister Trinh in his banquet speech INTERNATIONALISM on the 24th presented an optimistic picture of relations with the DPRK and other members of the socialist world. He referred to the fruitful development of Vietnamese-Korean friendship on the basis of Marxism-Leninism and proletarian internationalism, suggested a toast to the "solidarity" of the socialist countries and the international communist and workers movement on this basis, and carefully specified both the Soviet Union and China in referring to support from the socialist countries. These are orthodox, standard formulations and are ccnsistent with Hanoi propaganda during the Podgornyy visit. They are noteworthy only against the bacLground of Hanoi's July-August implications that Peking, in extending the invitation to the President, was departing from a proletarian internationalist path. Even after Hanoi ceased its anti-Chinese polemic at the end of August, it remained reluctant to describe Sino-U.S. relations as based on proletarian internationalism--a reluctance dramatically demonstrated during Li Hsien-nieti's late- September visit. While Hanoi must have been irked by Kim I1-song's endorsement of Peking's invitation to President Nixon,* its current propaganda now presents a DPRK-DRV relationship of "militant solidarity" and "warm" friendship. * See the TRENDS of 11 August 1971, pages 13-15. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 Pak Song-chol in his speech at the banquet referred to Korean "loyalty" to proletarian internationalism in a passage in which he said that the Korean people regard the struggle of the Vietnamese people as an encouragement to their own revolutionary cause and "will continue doing their utmost to give moral and material assistance to the fraternal Vietnamese people until their final victory." Pak followed this assertion with a repetition of the line on Asian unity promulgated by Peking and Pyongyang which implicitly excludes the Soviet Union. He reiterated that U.S. imperialism will be driven out of the countries of Asia in the face of the "Joint fight of the Korean peopl3, the Vietnamese people, the Lao people, the Cambodian people, and the Chinese people." Speaking at the Hanoi meeting the next day, he similarly referred to Asian unity, and in another passage promised continued "active aid" to the Vietnamese people. Some seeming inconsistencies in Hanoi's line on Chinese adherence to proletarian internationalism have come to light in recent propaganda. After having studiously avoided references to the concept during Li Hsien-nien's visit, DRV leaders did refero proletarian internationalism in their congratulatory message marking the 1 October PRC National Day.* However, they dropped the declaration contained in the 1970 anniversary message that mutual friendship between the two peoples had been "unceasingly consolidated and developed" on this basis. As reported by NCNA, a Vietnamese official of the friendship association at a 29 September meeting said that the Vietnamese "are determined to do their utmost to nurture the fraternal friendship and militant solidarity between our two peoples based on Marxism- Leninism and proletarian internationalism. . . ." Hanoi media failed to publicize this statement, but the omission seems less significant in light of a similar pledge in an article on DRV diplomacy by Foreign Minister Trinh in the October issue of the party journal HOC TAP. Trinh said: "We will strive to strengthen our militant solidarity and friendly relations with the brother socialist countries, especially the Soviet Union and China, on the basis of Marxism-Leninism and proletarian internationalism." * See the TRENDS of 29 September 1971, pages 4-5, and of 6 October 1971, pages 2-3. Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 BREZI-INEV IN FRANCE WARNS OF INTRIGUES AGAINST THE VIETNAMESE Moscow's restrained treatment of the United States in the wake of the announcement of the President's forthcoming visit to the Soviet Union appeared to have been reflected in Brezhnev's speech at a dinner given by President Pompidou on the 25th. Avoiding criticism of U.S. foreign policy, the Soviet party chief remarked that his visit to France was taking place "in a complex situation" and added mildly that "the war in Indochina is continuing and the Middle East crisis is still unsettled." But Brezhnev showed no such restraint in a speech on the 27th that he hosted for Pompidou. He called U.S. "aggression" in Indochina one of the most serious obstacles to peace, and said that the way to settle the conflict is "to end fozeign interference" in that part of the world. And, in the first such statement by a top Soviet leader, he went on to declare: "This problem cannot be solved either by attempts to impose an alien will on Vietnam by means of force, or by way of secret combinations behind the Vietnamese people's back." As would be expected in the circumstances, he mentioned neither the United States nor China by name. Gromyko in his 28 September UNGA speech explicitly d'scussed Sine-U.S. relations and went on to raise the specter of "combinations" of states directed against others in a general context without mentioning Vietnam.* Brezhnev's remarks seem particularly notable coming against the background of Kissinger's return from his second trip to Peking as well as the UN vote on the seating of the PRC--developments which dramatize the PRC's expanding role in world affairs. In his brief statement on the "correct" way to settle the Indochinese question, Brezhnev said nothing about the PRG's 1 July seven-point proposal. Authoritative Moscow press reaction in July and August to the announcement of the President's Peking visit had charged that it eased pressure on Washington to respond to the 1 July peace proposal.** * This passage was included in extracts of Gromyko's speech distributed by TASS but it was excised from the version of the speech published in the central press. See the TRENDS of 6 October, page 41. ** Moscow had endorsed the PRG proposal in a PRAVDA editorial on 5 July--the day after PEOPLE'S DAILY's editorial endorsement. Both Gromyko in his UNGA speech and Podgornyy in a 3 October speech in Hanoi criticized U.S. failure to respond to the proposal. Approved For Release 1999=AMN1 4A-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 DRV DEPRECATES PRESIDENTS RADIO TAU(. HAILS ANTIWAR FORCES At this writing Vietnamese communist media have not publicized antiwar demonstrations in Washington marking the Veterans Day weekend. But VNA on 27 October did report what it described as a "recent" message from Hoang Minh Giam, chairman of the Vietnam Committee for Solidarity with the American People, hailing the "fall offensive." President Nixon's 24 October radio talk marking the Veterans Day holiday prompts a Hanoi domestic service broadcast on the 26th which ridicules the President's remarks that the United States is ending the war and proceeding toward preventing the outbreak of others, and that there is now a greater chance to make the present U.S. Vietnam veterans the last war veterans. Hanoi observes that the President "hoped that his flowery words" would deceive American and world opinion. And it goes on to counter his assertion that the war is ending by describing continued U.S. bombing and other military action throughout Indochina. The broadcast does not specify the various steps spelled out by the President which he said moved toward peace, and it of couzse ignores his remarks that hi3 trips to Moscow and Peking are directed toward that end. Hanoi also takes issue with the President's contention that the antiwar movement opposes U.S. servicemen and veterans. It says that he "brazenly distorted the truth about the American people's antiwar movement" which in fact, it adds, has "gained the sympathy of many servicemen and veterans." The radio claims that "heedless of Nixon's boastful arguments," the people are "actively making preparations for the fall struggle movement" to demand an end to the war and repatriation of all U.S. troops. The Hoang Minh Giam message on the fall offensive--a routine propaganda exercise at times of U.S. antiwar campaigns--says that after the impetus of the spring antiwar activities, the "ongoing fall offensive has destroyed the myth created by the American warlike circles that the peace movement is dying." The message, carried by VNA on the 27th, claims that the antiwar struggle underlines the fact that the American people "will not be deceived by any political lie," that they will "have the last word to achieve their demands and will remove all those who go counter to their tradition of peace and justice." Giam also routinely called on the U.S. Administration to respond to the PRG's seven-point peace proposal. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 PARIS TALKS: COMMUNIST MEDIA CONTINUE CURSORY ATTENTTON Vietnamese communist media's attention to the Paris talks is confined to the cryptic LPA and VNA accounts of the sessions. Consistent with recent practice, the VNA accoun.. of the 21 October session dismisses Ambassador Porter's statement in a single sentence, saying that he "continued to maintain his aggressive and colonialist stand." And VNA totally ignores the GVN statement. PRG delegate Nguyen Van Tien's statement is again replete with criticism of Ambassador Porter, but the VNA account omits or softens many of his remarks. Tien repeateuly criticized Porter "for over the past five sessions rehashing the shop- worn allegations of his predecessors, distorting facts and making black white." VNA notes that Tieu denounced the U.S. delegate for trying "by hook or crook to prettify" President Thieu and the recent election. But it ignores Tien's charge that Porter "even wants to negate the South Vietnamese people's great resistance to U.S. aggression, led by the NFLSV and the PRG"--an obvious reference to the Ambassador's assertions that the NFLSV has little real influence in South Vietnam militarily or politically. VNA also ignores DRV delegate Nguyen Minh Vy's question to Porter asking "how he can deny that at this conference table he has been resorting to the arguments of a colonialist aggressor to continue to hinder the work of the conference." Vy's statement consisted largely of charges of "fresh U.S. war acts" against the Indochinese countries, and he described the upcoming trip to South Vietnam by Defense Secretary Laird, Admiral Moorer and General Westmoreland as evidence that the Nixon Administration "is scheming to take new military adventures." DRV SPOKESMAN., COMMENT RAP U.S. RAIDS IN DMZ. NORTH VIETNAM The DRV Foreign Ministry spokesman on 22 October issues the most recent in its series of protests against U.S. strikes in the DMZ and North Vietnam. The statement charges that from 16 to 20 October, U.S. planes including B-52's attacked Huong Lap village and U.S. artillery from "south of the demilitarized zone" and U.S. ships shelled Vinh Giang and Vinh Son villages. The three villages, described as being "nor;:h of the 17th Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 parallel" were also thu subject of the two most recent foreign ministry spokesman protests on 9 and 16 October. The current protest also says that on the 18th and 19th U.S. aircraft "bombed populated areas" in Tuyen Hoa and Minh Hoa districts, Quang Binh Province. The charges voiced in the foreign ministry spokesman's protest are echoed in a 23 October Hanoi radio commentary. It is unclear why this particular protest prompted comment when none followed the four previous similar protests in the past month. The commentary recalls the intensive 21 September raids--which had been protested at the higher level of a DRV Foreign Ministry statement on the 22d--calling them a "typical case" of repeated U.S. "crimes" against the people of Vinh Linh and Quang Binh. It also recalls that the Administration used the "extremely overbearing and odious allegation" of self-defense reaction to justify those acts. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 U S S R - I N D I A MOSCOW REGISTERS CONCERN OVER INDO-PAKISTANI SITUATION In the month since Prime Minister Gandhi's 27-29 September state visit to the Soviet Union,* Soviet media's treatmet of events in the Indian subcontinent has evolved from an outpouring of Soviet public sentiment in support of the refugees streaming into India, underscoring sympathy with India's position, to expressions of unconcealed concern that the Indian-Pakistani confrontation may result in war. The propaganda sustains its pro-Indian character, though tempered now by exhortations for mutual restraint. Declaring that "both sides were in full agreement in assessing the situation," the statement issued following 22-25 October "consultations" in New Delhi between Soviet Deputy Foreign Minist%r Firyubin and Indian officials, including Prime Minister Gandhi, reflected both the continuing Soviet support for he Indian position and increased mutual concern over the explosive- ness of the border situation. The "consultations," according to the statement released on the 27th by TASS and INFORMATION SERVICE of INDIA, were held "in connection with the tense situation which has arisen on the Indian subcontinent and which endangers peace in that part of the world." The statement specified that the discussions were held "in accordance with the existing practice of biannual, bilateral consultations and with Article 9 of the Soviet-Indian treaty of peace, friendship, and cooperation." Article 9 provides that in the event of an attack or a threat of attack the two parties "will immediately start mutual consultations with a view to eliminating this threat and taking appropriate effective measures to ensure peace and security for their countries." INFORMATION SERVICE of INDIA cited an official spokesman as saying it was India which "had invoked" Article 9. A New Delhi broadcast on the 28th reported that the P.S. Kutakhov, commander-in-chief of the Soviet air force, was scheduled to arrive in the Indian capital the next day for a six-day visit. * The visit is reviewed in the TRENDS of 6 October, pages 26-30. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 Approved For Release 1999/09/25: CIA-RDP85T00875R000300040044-3 CONFIDENTIAL FBIS TRENDS 28 OCTOBER 1971 Soviet concern over the situation had been registered in the joint communique publicized on 26 October at the end of Kosygin's visit to Canada. The communique called -as Moscow has done repeatedly before--for a "political settlement" in East Pakistan "that would take into account the legitimate rights and interests of its populat n and would facilitate a speedy and secure return of the refugees," but it added now that "this would be facilitated if the interested parties exerc_ied restraint." Thus in a formal document to which India was not a party, Moscow sharpened the thrust of earlier statements by Soviet leaders on the necessity for both Pakistan and India to display the prudence necessary to forestall military hostilities. In a speech on 14 September, at a dinnar for the king of Afgha