WEEKLY SUMMARY SPECIAL REPORT A NEW LOOK IN FRENCH-AFRICAN RELATIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 26, 2004
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 30, 1973
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1.pdf648.72 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 Secret 25X1 DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE WEEKLY SUMMARY Special Report A New Look in French-African Relations CIA DOCUMENT SERVICES FILE COPY DD NOT DESTROY Secret N! 660 30 March 1973 No. 0363/73A Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET A NEW LOOK IN FRENCH-AFRICAN; RELATIONS Summary Paris is loosening the ties that bind it to its former colonies in Black Africa; in so doing, Paris is reacting to pressures from some of the states involved. Since inde- pendence in 1960, fourteen of France's former colonies-Mauritania, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Upper Volta, Togo, Dahomey, Niger, Central African Republic, Chad, Gabon, Cameroon, Congo, Mali, and the Malagasy Republic-have been dealing with France under a series of 14 separate, paternalistic accords. Paris is holding bilateral talks with each country that has requested revision of these accords. The Africans have not tried to coordinate their demands; nor is it assured that they will all be treated alike, since their economic and sentimental value to France varies widely. Over the past decade, Paris has used the accords to ensure French dominance of commerce, trade, and finance and to give France the decisive voice in cultural and educational matters. French private and public investment has flourished because the climate has been favorable and no restrictions placed on the repatriation of profits. Paris has channeled over $4 billion in aid to the area over the past decade. None of the African states has challenged the idea of continued cooperation with France, but virtually all of them would like to make the special relationship more Special Report 30 March 1973 Approved For Release 2005/01/15E P85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET African Countries Maintaining Close Ties with France ~t Major French military base . Minor French military station Special Report ?-'?NGOLA (Pon.) ZAMBIA TANZANIA Ohpo?Suueik IMOZAMBIOUE SOUTH?WE'iT AFRICA wM.VI$DAY i (In IPF.,I BOTSWANA ,w.,Il,NO _, REPUBLIC J H AFRICA OF ( rsV+ \% Approved For Release 2005/01 /blE6lR- P85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET flexible and less one-sided. Specifically, they are looking for a better economic deal. Paris appears willing to go along in revising technical, aid, and cultural accords, but will be less forthcoming where monetary and defense policies are concerned. So far, Mauritania has pulled out of the franc zone because the French would not meet its demands concerning Nouakchott's new national currency, and neither Mauritania nor the Malagasy Republic has been able to reach an agreement with France on the revision of defense accords. Paris seems to be in a position to regulate the pace and extent of change, but if the Africans become more assertive the French may be impelled to make considerably more changes than they have so far been willing to accept. After granting its African colonies independ- ence in 1960, France has managed to keep close ties with all of them. (Guinea, which became independent in 1958, is an exception.) Operating under a series of paternalistic accords, France today still sees political and military advantages in a continuing relationship with its former color'es in Africa. Commercial profits, along with what might be called the French cultural imperative, will also push Paris to keep its hand in; at least, they will slow the French retreat in the face of African pressure for change. France, pre-eminently among the old im- perial powers, has been keen on spreading its language and culture. In the 19th century, it went so far as to develop an extraordinary policy under which France would "assimilate" the colonial peoples into the French way of life. Based on the doctrine that French civilization was in every way superior, the assimilation policy invited Africans to adopt French standards in nearly every sphere of human activity. Considering that the French were very much outnumbered (there are today some 50 million Africans and less than a quarter of a million whites in French-speaking Africa), the policy never had much of a chance and was abandoned. Still, echoes of the philosophy under- lying it still reverberate through the African col- onies, and France continues to transplant its cul- tural, linguistic, and educational experience to Africa. French businessmen in Africa, frequently abetted by African associates, have, since inde- pendence, enjoyed a preferential position. Their preferential position is little disturbed today, and they continue to reap and expatriate huge profits. In the past year or so, the French leadership has begun to take a less possessive attitude toward its former colonies. The gradual shift reflects not only the change in leaders in France but an in- creased restiveness on the part of the leaders of the French-speaking African states. General De Gaulle is gone, and President Pompidou has re- placed him. The General pursued a quite personal "The day will come when the men for whom France is a second fatherland will no longer be in power. Should not France show that she takes the word independence seriously?" Le Monde, January 1973 African policy, molded by his concern with France's "civilizing mission" and his World War 11 connections with the former African colonies and some of their leaders; Porpidou carries less bag- gage of this type. Also gone is Yvon Bourges, who headed the French cooperation program; in his place is Pierre Billecocq, a progressive and prag- matic man, committed to a policy of open dia- logue with any state that wishes to revise the accords. He has pledged that France "will stop meddling in everything." Billecocq appears to have the full backing of Pompidou and at least the acquiescence of the shadowy Jacques Foccart Special Report Approved For Release 2005/01/b'E0R[91P85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET nation in 1969 of De Gaulle, but even the General could pull only Ivory Coast and Gabon along to join France in supporting the breakaway Biafran regime in English-speaking Nigeria. Lefore he de- parted, De Gaulle also saw the French-backed Afro-Malagasy and Mauritian Common Organiza- tion begin to change from a force for political moderation to a lobby for the African states' econorr.;c interest. Other poles of attraction have emerged. With the French-speaking African states' association with the EC, their economic allegiances are slowly being reoriented from France toward a kind of partnership with Europe generally. Thus fai, the impact has been as much psychological as mate- rial, and France's former colonies would like to diversify their aid and trade relationships. The English-speaking countries nearby attract them, as does the possibility of closer regional ties or aid from Moscow, Peking, and Western donors. As President Diori of Niger has asked, "Can we be blamed for playing all our cards?" Foccart (I.) and Billecocq Over the past year or so, Diori has gradually become the most outspoken and articulate critic of France's role in Africa, voicing complaints that most other leaders lack the courage to put into words. He is convinced that Niger's long-range development is linked to that of Nigeria, already Niger's main African trading partner. Diori wishes to be free to promote even closer economic ties with Lagos. He has also had a close assistance and advisory relationship with Canada. Ould Daddah of predominantly Muslim Mauritania has been drawing closer to Libya and Algeria, and his for- eign policy moves in that direction complement his desire for "Arabization" at home to the detri- ment of French cultural influence in his country. I ]-I he influence of Foccart, who still heads the Secretariat of African and Malagasy Affairs at the Elysee, has apparently diminished over the past year. Personalities on the African side have also changed. In the 12 years since independence, eight of the fourteen states have undergone one or more changes of leadership, and in each in- stance (except for Gabon) a military strong man is in power. The leaders today feel less grateful to France, either because newer and usually younger figures have emerged with no special affection for France, or because sentimental ties binding the old guard to France are wearing thin. The break- down of loyalt'^~ was accelerated by the resig- Special Report "We want to recover our sovereignty and we are ready to pay the price." President Moktar Ould Daddah of Mauritania There have been anti-French pressures in vir- tually all states. No Africzii government can safely ignore activist elements among students, labor, and civil servants. In many countries of Approved For Release 2005/01 S'EOLR. P85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET French-speaking Africa, these elements have been f sharpening their criticism of close cooperation with France and demanding accelerated African- ization, better jobs, and greater economic sover- eignty. The extension of schools and consumer economies has created rising popular expecta- tions, but not enough jobs for the younger and more politicized generation that now comprises at least half the population of French-speaking Africa. This generation resents French dominance of commerce, which stifles native opportunities in every country except Mali, and the continued prEsence of expatriates in the government. The questioning of France's role has been encouraged in recent years by the large number of predominantly young, anti-establishment French technicians, particularly teachers, who have been sent to Africa as volunteers in lieu of military service. There is also a body of sophisticated writing by French-speaking Africans aimed at their contemporaries in government and academic circles. Their writing portrays the African policy of France as inherently selfish and anachronistic. A Canadian economist produced an influential study for the Niger Government that took a hard and critical look at the advantages and disadvan- tages for Niger of membership in the franc zone. I t is no wonder then that over the past year a number of French African leaders have sought changes in the basic accords designed to satisfy their wish for greater national control. So far, eight of the 14 are known to have expressed dissatisfaction to France via diplomatic channels or in public pronouncements. Pressures for change have come most strongly from Mauritania and the Malagasy Republic; Niger, Congo, Daho- mey, and Cameroon are not far behind, with Togo and Gabon bringing up the rear. (Mali, having largely broken out of the French sphere a decade ago, is a sympathetic bystander.) Chad, the Central African Republic, and Upper Volta will probably follow in seeking modest modifica- tions in their ties with France. Only Ivory Coast President Houphouet-Boigny, France's staunchest African ally and the grand old man of West Afri- can politics, has privately expressed his Special Report "For Paris, the franc zone is the true backbone of French policy in Africa." Jeune Afrique, December 1972 All ex-French territories, except Guinea and now Mauritania, retain full membership in the franc zone. Twelve states participate through the multi- lateral African Financial Community, which embraces three subgroupings, each with its own currency and issuing bank. Africans receive monetary stability and accept conservative French monetary and banking policies in place of national control. Zone arrange- ments protect France's privileged trade by setting effective ceilings on imports by Africans from outside the zone and the EC, and minimum levels for certain imports from France. Most African issuing banks must hold their members' pooled currency reserves and foreign exchange earnings in French francs in a French treasury account into which receipts are credited and payments debited. African states ordi- narily cannot impose exchange controls or revalue their currencies without the consent of all parties, and they are obliged to follow the lead of France in these areas. Congo, Malagasy Republic, and Mauri- tania have, however, initiated exchange controls with- out asking French permission. Approved For Release 2005/01/'ISECR85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET satisfaction with the accords as they are. Senghor of Senegal is not really dissatisfied, although he has strcnger domestic pressure to deal with. Those who want change are looking for a better economic deal: they want broader regional cooperation, particaiarly with English-speaking states nearby; grcdter control over their own mon- etary matters; and an end to strings on French aid. The Africans are just beginning what is cer- tain to be a long dialogue with Paris on monetary matters, and they are far from a consensus on the modifications they want. President Ould Daddah of Mauritania be- lieves that the sizable foreign exchange earnings of his country's mining operations are adequate to back a national currency (with a little help from President Qadhafi, who has offered a sub- stantial drawing account on the Bank of Libya). Ould Daddah c~..n, therefore, be more aggressive in his financial demands than the others who lack his combination of political determination and a well-heeled backer. Togo, which has been success- ful in attracting aid from Bonn and Peking, has more maneuverability than a country like Gabon, where the French investment is heavy and Presi- dent Bongo needs French troops to stay in office. Cooperation Agreements Between France and Its African Client States 0 did 0 ~o, Gp e y, ad G, . ell 3P 7 < ? ~~d 3G -C. GG' ~d d . ,Jd. dG. G~ cd/, 4f N7 d^ip ~Q. N o 7 d~n G'.a. ~n Gd n 16 d3P~s ~Om~~~~ d3A~i do d~d3 ~d7f d0P?i `~~~' d~iP~i d3d3 d7id~' "~(,~i dpi dG, 9, 9 116 Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Congo Dahomey Ivory Coast Gabon Malagasy Repub'ic Mali Mauritania Niger Senegal Togo Upper Vol, i Special Report Approved For Release 2005/01/$ WP85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 - RE P8, 85TOO875 1 ~t In general, however, the African attitude is char- acterized by ambivalence: they want more con- trol over their own affairs, but they want France to stand behind them. This attitude finds expres- sion in the demands of some states for financial autonomy while insisting that Paris continue to back their currencies. The French Response French officials are themselves divided on how far Paris should go in meeting African de- mands. Even those favoring a continuation of the Gaullist policy of aid to Africa, however, have apparently realized that African development has become too costly for France and that other donors must be encouraged to share the burden. The concept of French Africa as a "special pre- serve," in which no poachers are allowed, seems to have been abandoned. Emphasis now is on "coordination," although Paris clearly expects to go on playing the key role. Paris' position is not without its own ambiv- alence. France is willing to open its former col- onies to more outside economic influence, but is extremely sensitive about retaining its cultural, commercial, and military dominance. Paris wants to continue its privileged relationship, but is will- ing to begin a gentle disengagement in which it controls all stages of the retreat. Pompidou, during his trip to Africa last November (his third since 1971), outlined a "new look" in French aid policy. From now on, he said, French aid would be given on a flexible, over-all, multi-year frame- work tied to the development plans of the Afri- can countries. France would remain the major donor (in fact, French aid this year-$345 mil- lion-is .15 percent more than last), but would cooperate with other donors and try to help the Africans diversify their sources of aid. The French plan to reduce their visibility in Africa by cutting back the number of French technical assistants and by training Africans to replace them. The majority of the more than 10,000 cooperants are teachers, and it was a stu- dent, after all, who threw a tomato at Pompidou during his trip to Niamey in 1972, and students are at the center of discontent and political unrest Special Report -7- French African Cooperation Accords The accords, signed at independence in 1960, have never been published, but their general provisions are known. They spell out a broad range of relation- ships in diplomacy, economics, culture, and defense, and provide the legal basis foi continued French hegemony in French-speaking Arica. Guinea did not sign the accords and has not hrd diplomatic relations with France since 1965. Mali signed the accords but established its own national currency and bank in 1962; after five years of floundering, it signed a financial accord with France in 1967 by which Paris underwrote its currency. The accords gave Paris a virtual monopoly in trade and greatly facilitated commercial relations by guaranteeing the convertibility of African francs into French francs at a fixed rate; Paris also gained control of African regional banks. French public and private investment flourished because there were practically no restrictions on the repatriation of capital and profits to France. The accords were by no means one-way street; France has poured in over $4 billion in aid to the area since 1960. Paris forged strong cultural ties through the use of French as the official language and through dom- ination of African educational systems and the media. Although most of the military agreements specified that France would defend the fledgling African states against internal or external threats, Paris has moved in cpenly only when its economic interests were seri- ously threatened (e.g., Gabon in 1964). It has over- flight rights in most countries and permanent military bases in Senegal, Ivory Coast, Gabon, Chad, and the Malagasy Republic (the latter now being disputed). 30 March 1973 Approved For Release 2005/01/ ISEO IFDP85T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET in many countries. Finally, Paris has proposed that its educational assistance be re-oriented toward technical and vocational training, particu- larly modern training for young farmers. Specifi- cally, more attention will be placed on literacy programs in vernacular languages. Pompidou has said that he favors cooperation between the French- and English-speaking countries, but Paris would not look kindly on the integration of its former colonies into a larger unit in which the interests of the English speakers might prevail. In the cultural, military assistance, and dip- lomatic fields the Africans are pressing for change and are likely to get it. Now that Africans have taken control of their national universities and other institutions of higher learning, they want the educational accords modified to drop the requirement that rectors, professors, and curricula be chosen by agreement between the African gov- ernment concerned and France. In the military assistance field the Africans reject the stipulations that make them give first priority to France in seeking arms and training and consult Paris before approaching alternative sources. At least one ex- colony, Congo, would put an end to the anachro- nistic. formality which institutionalized the role of the French ambassador as the dean of the diplo- matic corps. The Malagasy Republic and Maurita- nia have already done so. Between the formulation of a new aid strat- egy and its successful execution lies a number of formidable obstacles. Many African countries do not have the development planning capacity re- quired for a closely coordinated long-term devel- opment effort. With the exception of Peking, which has offered Dahomey and Togo $45 mil- lion and $46 million in aid respectively, there are no new donors in sight with both the resources and the interest to play a significantly larger role in French-speaking Africa. There is a real possi- bility for coordination between the French and other donors (including the US) in such matters as houseing, transportation, and industry. A cutback in the number of French techni- cians and educators may be a step in the right Special Report direction, but the course will be far from smooth. Increased teaching in the vernacular languages, for example, creates controversy. Which vernacular? Last month saw rioting in the Malagasy Republic, caused in part because the coastal tribes fear increased use in the educational system of the Malagasy language (essentially Merina, the lan- guage of the plateau people). French cooperation chief Billecocq is right in noting that Paris has imposed Sorbonnes on countries that need quite a different sort of training; however, the African elite has learned that a French education leads to a coveted job in the bureaucracy; this is a lesson that will be hard to forget. Above all, it is diffi- cult to legislate decolonialization. As a Togolese official remarked, "The French talk easily about a new look, but it is not so easy to kill the old man who sleeps inside many Frenchmen." French Monetary Policies One of the most important, and from Paris' view, durable, ties that bind France and the Afri- cans it once ruled is the monetary one. There is so far no new look in France's conservative mone- tary policies in respect to the franc zone, nor is one planned. African francs are fully convertible to French francs at a fixed rate guaranteed by France, and the four African regional banks of issue aie French controlled. Monetary questions are still handled by French officials in the various African financial ministries and in the countries' national banks. Pompidou has expressed sympa- thy for the African wish for a greater monetary say; he is prepared to make more of the franc zone's foreign exchange reservas available for African economic development, but has indicated that Paris will retain ultimate control. The changes that have taken place in the five-member bank of the equatorial African states have been largely cosmetic; the staff has been Africanized, the bank has taken on a modest economic dev,;l- opment role, and credit policies have been re- laxed. West African members of the franc zone already enjoy an Africanized staff, and their cen- tral bank will be given similar development and credit prerogatives. In both cases, however, the banks are run by a French managing director and a two-thirds vote of the board of directors is 30 March 1973 Approved For Release 2005/01/11SFJ&R &5T00875R001500050015-1 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP85T00875R001500050015-1 SECRET required on "important" questions, with the French deciding what is important. Fundamental revision of the franc zone- central to the influence Paris wields in Africa- does not seem in the cards unless the Africans begin to pull together. Aid chief Billecocq in aLe Monde interview last month put forward pro- posals for a two-tier zone that go far beyond those of his more conservative colleagues. During Pompidou's African trip last winter, he reacted sharply to a request by Togolese President Eya- dema for a revision of links hctween French and African francs. "The African franc," Pompidou pointed out, "would collapse in a day without French backing." Despite France's hard line, Pres- ident Ould Daddah's example in leaving the franc zone will probably embolden some others to look for alternative backers and then press for more flexible :rant zone arrangements. President Eya- dema reportedly received a flurry of congratula- tory telephone calls from fellow African leaders following his request to Pompidou. Mauritania has asked for the termination of both its mutual defense pact and its communica- tions agreements with France. Nouakchott ob- jects to the provision that gives France the right to station and move troops through the country. In rancorous negotiations last month the two sides failed to reach agreement on military coop- eration. Mauritania refused to give France mili- tary overflight rights and, when France tried to make the continuation of the advisory mission contingent on concessions to the French position Special Report on overflights, asked Paris to withdraw its mili- tary advisers. Military cooperation negotiations are also deadlocked in the Malagasy Republic; the French are unwilling to surrender their naval base at Diego Suarez, the headquarters of their Indian Ocean military forces. The Malagasy insist on asserting their sovereignty over the base. The two sides have yet to find a formula that would satisfy their sensitivities without requiring expulsion of the French. The two countries, however, have made progress in working out new monetary ar- rangements. The Malagasy Republic is to remain in the franc zone, but :;will enjoy more economic independence. Certain geographic, cultural, and political factors set Mauritania and the Malagasy Republic apart from the other nations of French-speaking Africa, and the difficult pattern of negotiations between these two countries and Paris will prob- ably not be followed elsewhere. Mauritania and the Malagasy Republic, after all, were the coun- tries which resisted most strorigiy the French 19th century policy of assimilation. Still, change is in the wind throughout French-speaking Africa, and Paris may not be able to control the pace as closely as it would like. Close cultural ties are likely to persist, but once he generation of Senegalese President Senghor and Ivory Coast President Houphouet-Boigny- heavily wedded to French language and culture- passes from the scene, Paris may find that con- sider0l more than cosmetic change will be re- quired. 30 March 1973 Approved For Release 2005/01/1 . 'IGA-LLM5T00875R001500050015-1