NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

USSR: MERCHANT FLEET LINER OPERATIONS IN 1984

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
16
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 30, 2009
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 1, 1985
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6.pdf569.92 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Confidential Agenda Item No. B-5 USSR: Merchant Fleet Liner 14 Operations in 1984 Working Group Paper Office of Global Issues Directorate of Intelligence Confidential GI M-85-10088 June 1985 Copy 0 9 3 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential USSR: Merchant Fleet Liner Operations in 1984 Summary The number of international cargo lines run by Soviet steamship compa- nies pushed from 71 in December 1983 to a new high of 80 at the end of 1984. This represents a dramatic recovery since 1980 when the number of lines dropped to 63 following withdrawal of Soviet lines from US trade after the invasion of Afghanistan. As in 1983, the number of lines in the cross trades between non-Soviet ports exceeds the number in Soviet foreign trade. With most Soviet lines operating outside the conference system, only six currently function as conference members. During 1984, the number of lines offering fast turnaround container, roll- on/roll-off (ro/ro) , or barge carrier service rose from 47 to 59, leaving only 21 that offer purely breakbulk service. Twelve new lines were added and three old ones dropped. The new lines will add little to competitive pressures on Free World shipowners. Ten carry largely Warsaw Pact or Soviet client country cargoes; only two carry cross trade goods in the commerce of developed countries. Ten of the new lines, one using new feeder barge carriers, are fast turnaround. In addition, service on three existing container or breakbulk lines was upgraded by the assignment to them of ro/ro ships and another existing breakbulk line began to offer container service. Eight new large (over 7,500 deadweight tons) fast turnaround ships joined the liner fleet in 1984 (four containerships and four barge carriers) . No large ro/ro ships were acquired. Soviet use of two of their largest ro/ro ships for inefficient short-haul service to Western Europe ended in 1984 with assignment of the vessels to the Baltic-Cuba run. In the Far East, major containerships continue to be used for short voyages between Soviet Pacific ports and Japan. In at least two important trades, disputes between nonconference Soviet lines and ratesetting conferences whose members want to limit the impact of Soviet rate cutting on their business caused problems in 1984. Talks in June between Soviets and officials of the conference that dominates trade between Europe and the Far East on possible Soviet Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential membership in that conference accomplished nothing, and talks in July with the conferences in the Europe-East Africa trade ended similarly.. No comparable difficulties arose over the roles of Soviet carriers in the Japan-Australia and Europe-Central America trades, which have been trouble spots in the past. ii Confidential Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential USSR: Merchant Fleet Liner Operations in 1984 Changes in the In 1984, the number of international cargo lines operated by the Soviet Overall Liner Ministry of the Maritime Fleet pushed to 80, a new high. The previous Network peak figure-74-was achieved in 1979, but in 1980 after the invasion of Afghanistan Soviet lines in US trade had to be disbanded or rerouted, causing a drop in the total to 63 (see tables 1-4). Of the lines functioning at the end of 1984, 39 were services engaged predominantly in the carriage of other countries' cross-trade cargoes. Among the remaining lines, 33 were devoted chiefly to movements in the USSR's foreign trade. The status of the remaining eight is unclear. Soviet participation in ratesetting "conferences" remained at a low level in 1984. Only six Soviet lines-all of them in the cross trades-were full conference members, charging conference rates and accepting confer- ence limits on sailings and cargo carried in the trades involved. The pace of Soviet efforts to improve service on their cargo lines by adding ships and cargo-handling systems that reduce ship turnaround time in ports picked up in 1984. As a result, the number of lines offering fast-turnaround service rose from 47 to 59. Among these, the number of lines offering ro/ro service grew from 10 to 16; the number offering both ro/ro and container service went up from 13 to 16; the number offering container service increased from 23 to 25; and the number served by barge carriers rose from one to two. Services Added or The increase of nine in the number of Soviet international cargo lines Dropped resulted from the opening of 12 new lines and the disbanding of three preexisting lines. There is no discernible geographic pattern among the 12 newly opened lines. Most offer one or more forms of fast-turnaround service involving the use of specialized ships and/or the carriage of cargo in containers. 25X1 In most cases, the opening of the new lines in 1984 will add little in the way of cross-trade competition for West European and Japanese liner operators. Seven are devoted largely to the carriage of Soviet bilateral trade; three are essentially cross-trade services that benefit fellow Warsaw Pact or client countries; and only two are cross-trade lines whose obvious purpose is the earning of hard currency. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Five of the new lines offer purely ro/ro service. These include: two Estonian Steamship Company lines from Soviet Baltic ports-one to Finland and one to Norway and Denmark, a Black Sea Steamship Company line from the Black Sea to Egypt, a feeder service by a Baltic steamship company ro/ro for the distribution of Soviet automobiles from a terminal in Panama to customers in the Caribbean area, and a unique seasonal service by ice-reinforced ships of the Murmansk Steamship Company linking Soviet Baltic ports with the west coast of Canada via the Northern Sea route. Three other new lines offer container service. These include a cross-trade line of the Black Sea Steamship Company between Cuba and India; an Azov-based line from the Black Sea to North Africa, Spain, and the west coast of Italy; and a container-carrying variant of the Far East Steamship Company's Japan-Southeast Asia-India line. The remaining new lines include a mixed ro/ro-container service by ships of the Black Sea Steamship Company from Italy to Aqaba, Jordan; a conventional breakbulk service of the same company from Southeast Asia to Red Sea, Mediterranean, and West European ports; a joint conventional service from Soviet Baltic ports to Cuba by ships of the Baltic Steamship Company and Empresa Cubana; and an innovative barge carrier feeder service of the Danube Steamship Company that moves barges and containers with cargoes for or from Danube riparian countries between the mouth of the Danube and ports on the Red Sea and eastern Mediterranean. The three lines that appear to have been disbanded during 1984 include a Baltic Steamship Company service from the Baltic to Nigeria, a Danube Company service from Soviet ports in the Danube delta to North Africa, and a Black Sea Steamship Company ro/ro service from Soviet Black Sea ports to Bulgaria, Greece, the west coast of Italy, Algeria, and Libya. Changes to Existing During 1984, three existing lines were upgraded by the assignment of Lines ro/ro ships. They are the Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-Eastern Medi- terranean (SAGA MEDITERRANEAN) service operated by the Estonian Steamship Company, the same company's Soviet Baltic-east coast of Sweden-Norway line, and the Latvian Steamship Company's RINELA line from the Soviet Baltic, Western Europe, and the east coast of the United Kingdom to the eastern Mediterranean. In addition, the Far East Steamship Company upgraded its conventional FESCO STRAITS PACIFIC line by offering container service. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Some of the more important changes to the itineraries of existing lines in 1984 were: the adding of calls in Western Europe by ships on the Latvian Steamship Company's Soviet Baltic-Ireland-west coast of United King- dom ro/ro-container service; the addition of calls at Scandinavian ports by ships of the Murmansk Steamship Company's ARCTIC line from Communist Baltic ports and Western Europe to Canadian east coast and Great Lakes ports; and the dropping of calls in Zaire by Estonian Steamship Company ships on the line from Soviet Baltic and West European ports to Angola. Additions to the The number of major units added to the USSR's fleet of fast-turnaround Liner Fleet vessels suitable for transoceanic service rose from five in 1983 to eight in 1984, bringing the total to 49 (see table 5). All of the ships acquired in this category were cellular container ships and barge carriers. Although large multipurpose ships with limited ro/ro capacity and small purely ro/ro vessels under 7,500 deadweight tons (DWT) continue to enter the fleet, no large specialized ro/ros have entered the fleet since 1982. The large full container ships added in 1984 included two of the 16,000 DWT East German-built Kapitan Gavrilov-class and two of the Bulgarian-built Simon Bolivar-class-9,400 DWT. The Gavrilovs were both assigned to major lines between Europe and the Far East; the Bolivars to Black Sea-Mediterranean service. During 1984, the fleet acquired its first feeder barge carriers, two units of the 8,730 DWT Anatoliy Zheleznyakov-class built in Italy and two of the 8,640 DWT Boris Polevoy-class built in Finland. The new feeder barge carriers will service a line from the mouth of the Danube to ports on the eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea. Changes in Ship- No major changes occurred during 1984 in the employment of the larger Use Patterns fast-turnaround ships that constitute the cutting edge of the USSR's liner fleet (see table 6). The only shift among the 15 large ro/ro ships was the transfer of two Magnitogorsk-class vessels from uneconomic short-haul service between the Soviet Baltic and Western Europe to the long-haul line from the Baltic to Cuba. As a result, all big Soviet ships of this type are again being used on appropriately long routes. No shifts of container ships larger than 7,500 DWT took place during the year, but evidence of underemployment of certain units persisted. On the USSR's Pacific coast, three Pula-class ships continued to operate on the short-haul route between the ports of Nakhodka and Vostochnyy and Japan. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Relations With Although working arrangements between Soviet lines and their West Western Shipowners European and Japanese competitors in certain trades have maintained Over Rate Cutting commercial peace since 1983, new contention over Soviet rate cutting and trade intrusion has led to friction in other key trades. The greatest problem, according to West European and Scandinavian owners, exists in Europe's trade with Southeast Asia and the Far East. Conference lines in this trade belong to the powerful Far East Freight Conference (FEFC) whose members were pressing for meetings with the Soviets at the end of 1983. Conference member concerns center on the activities of the Baltic Steamship Company's BALTORIENT container line which offers weekly sailings between Western Europe, Southeast Asia, and Hong Kong. At the end of 1984, 12 of the USSR's 22 largest container ships were assigned to BALTORIENT. Spokesmen for West European ship- owners claimed during 1984 that Soviet ships were moving 6 percent of all possible trade on the route. In June 1984, talks between Soviet merchant fleet officials and represen- tatives of the FEFC over conditions for possible Soviet membership in the conference broke down with no conclusive results. In September, the conference announced a series of rate reductions. According to press reports, these cutbacks are attributable more to competition from two major nonconference Taiwanese steamship companies-Evergreen Mar- itime Corporation and Yang Ming-than to the Soviet presence. The Taiwanese container ships are much larger than the USSR's biggest and their services are far more efficient. The only other trade in which frictions between Western conference lines and a Soviet line operating outside the conference system remain close to the surface is that between Western Europe and East Africa where rate cutting by the Baltic Steamship Company's Baltic-East Africa line (BESTA) has been a sore point in the past. According to a recent OECD report, BESTA carries about 13 percent of the liner cargoes moving from Western Europe to East Africa. Talks during July between Soviet merchant fleet representatives and conference officials in the East African trade on proposed conference membership for BESTA ended in a stalemate. The May 1983 working arrangement between the Soviet Far East Steamship Company and liner conferences in the Japan-Southeast Asia-Australia trade that set a quota on Soviet participation in the trade and a floor on Soviet rate cutting continued into 1984. During that year the Soviet Far East Steamship Company agreed to raise the rates charged by its Japan-Australia container service and asked in return for an increase in its allotted share of the trade. This matter was to be taken up at a meeting in Tokyo at the end of November between the Soviets and conference spokesmen, but the outcome of that meeting, if it actually occurred, is not known. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85T01058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential In trade between Western Europe and Central America, where the USSR's BALTCAPAS line operates under an agreement with the confer- ences involved as a "tolerated outsider," no problems were reported during 1984. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Table I USSR: International Cargo Lines Operated Unilaterally by Soviet Steamship Companies, 31 December 1984 Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-Canadian St. Lawrence and Great Lakes (ARCTIC LINE) a c Murmansk Soviet Baltic-Northern Sea route-west coast Canada d Baltic Soviet Baltic/Finland/East Germany-Mediterranean Europe-Australia Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-Central America/Venezuela/West Indies-Peru (BALTCAPAS) a c Baltic Panama-Caribbean (CARIBBEAN FEEDER SERVICE) d Baltic Soviet Baltic-Netherlands/Belgium-Finland (BALT-SCAN) ac Baltic Soviet Baltic-east coast United Kingdom (Hull) -West Germany- East Germany d Baltic Soviet Baltic-West Germany-east coast United Kingdom (London) (TRANS-SIBERIAN CONTAINER SERVICE) a c Baltic Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-United Kingdom-Cuba d Baltic Soviet Baltic-east coast United Kingdom (London) -Belgium- Netherlands-Finland a c d Soviet Baltic-Western Europe/east coast United Kingdom (London) -Red Sea-Southeast Asia/Hong Kong (BALTORIENT) a c Baltic Soviet Baltic-Finland-Sweden-Italy-Greece-Western Europe (SCAN-MED-CONT) a Baltic/Latvian Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-Portugal/Spain (PORTOBALTICA) a c d Baltic/Estonian Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-East Africa/Indian Ocean (BESTA) Estonian Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-eastern Mediterranean (SAGA MEDITERRANEAN) ad Estonian Soviet Baltic-east coast Sweden-Norway-West Germany c d Estonian Soviet Baltic-Norway-Sweden-eastern Mediterranean (SCANLEVANT) a Estonian Soviet Baltic-Finland-Denmark-Norway c d Estonian Soviet Baltic-Denmark-Norway d Estonian Soviet Baltic-Finland d Estonian Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-Angola d Latvian Soviet Baltic-east coast United Kingdom (London) -Western Euro- pe-North Africa (RICONA LINE) a Latvian Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-Ireland-west coast United Kingdom (Ellesmere Port) a c d Denmark/Western Europe/east coast United Kingdom (London) - eastern Mediterranean (RINELA) be d Danube Soviet Danube-Near East (Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, and Cyprus) Danube Soviet Danube-Greece Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Table I USSR: International Cargo Lines Operated Unilaterally by Soviet Steamship Companies, 31 December 1984 (continued) Western Europe/west coast United Kingdom (Bristol) -Red Sea- India/Pakistan (BLASCO INDOSTAN LINE) b c d Soviet Black Sea-Persian Gulf d Soviet Black Sea-Turkey-Jordan-Vietnam-Japan-Southeast Asia-Red Sea-Mediterranean (BLASCO ORIENT) a c d Black Sea Soviet Black Sea-Vietnam-Cambodia Black Sea Soviet Black Sea-Cuba Black Sea Cuba-South Asia a Black Sea Mediterranean-Red Sea-Southeast Asia/Hong Kong-South Asia (ODESSA OCEAN LINE CONTAINER SERVICE) a c Black Sea Soviet Black Sea-Pakistan-India-Bangladesh-Sri Lanka-Red Sea- Mediterranean (ODESSA OCEAN LINE) Black Sea Southeast Asia-Red Sea-Mediterranean-Western Europe a Azov Soviet Black Sea-Jordan d Azov Soviet Black Sea-Greece-east coast Italy-Egypt (AZMED) a c Azov Soviet Black Sea-Greece-east coast Italy Azov Soviet Black Sea-Red Sea-East Africa-east coast Italy (AZRED) Azov Soviet Black Sea-Turkey-Yugoslavia-east coast Italy-Greece (ASADCO) a Azov Soviet Black Sea-east coast Italy-Greece-Cyprus-Syria-Lebanon (ADMED) Azov Soviet Black Sea-Spain-west coast Italy-Greece (ASITCO) a c Azov Soviet Black Sea-North Africa-Spain-west coast Italy Azov Soviet Black Sea-east coast Italy-Greece-Turkey-Egypt a c Caspian North Sea-Baltic-Iran (Caspian) (via Volga-Baltic Waterway) (CASPIAN VOLGABALT LINE) a Caspian Mediterranean-Iran (Caspian) (via Volga-Don Canal) (MEDITERRANEAN CASPIAN LINE) a Far East Hong Kong-Southeast Asia-Japan-Soviet Far East-west coast Canada (FESCO STRAITS PACIFIC) a Soviet Far East/Japan-Southeast Asia/India (FESCO INDIA CONTAINER SERVICE) a Far East Soviet Far East-Japan-Hong Kong-Philippines-Australia (FESCO AUSTRALIA LINE) a a An independent line operating entirely or predominantly in the cross (or transit) trades. b A conference line operating entirely or predominantly in the cross trades. Line offering full or partial container service. d Line offering full or partial roll-on/roll-off service. Line served by barge carriers. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Table 2 USSR: International Cargo Lines Operated Jointly by Soviet and Foreign Steamship Companies, 31 December 1984 Soviet Company Route Nationality of Foreign Partners Baltic Soviet Baltic-east coast United Kingdom (Hull/Tilbury) c d Baltic Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-east coast South America (BALT AMERICA) b Polish and East German Estonian Soviet Baltic/Western Europe-West Africa (UNIAFRICA) b d Polish and East German Latvian Soviet Baltic-East Germany c d East German Latvian Soviet Baltic-France (Atlantic) c d French Latvian Soviet Baltic-Netherlands a c Dutch Latvian Soviet Baltic-Belgium a c Belgian Lithuanian Soviet Baltic-West Germany West German Danube Soviet Black Sea-Pakistan-India-Sri Lanka- Southeast Asia (INTERLIKHTER) a Bulgarian, Hungarian, and Czechoslovak Danube Soviet Black Sea-eastern Mediterranean-Red Sea c e Bulgarian, Hungarian, and Czechoslovak Azov Soviet Black Sea-west coast Italy (ITAZOV) Italian Azov Soviet Black Sea-Algeria Algerian a An independent line operating entirely or predominantly in the cross (or transit) trades. b A conference line operating entirely or predominantly in the cross trades. Line offering full or partial container service. d Line offering full or partial roll-on/roll-off service. Line served by barge carriers. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Table 3 USSR: Changes in International Liner Network, 1979-1984 30 April 30 April 30 April 30 April 31 De- 31 De- 31 De- 1979 1980 1981 1982 cember cember cember 1982 1983 1984 Largely or entirely Soviet 26 25 Unclear 4 4 Predominantly cross 44 Conference 7 Independent 37 34 5 29 Cargo handling mode Conventional breakbulk 32 28 Fast turnaround 42 35 Barge carrier 0 1 23 17 Mixed container and 0 0 barge carrier Mixed container and 10 8 roll-on/roll-off Table 4 USSR: Employment of International Cargo Lines, 31 December 1984 Soviet bilateral 33 13 Unclear 8 1 Cross and transit 39 7 Conference 6 1 Container 28 27 28 28 33 5 4 7 7 8 33 38 36 36 39 7 7 7 7 6 26 31 29 29 33 28 30 26 24 21 38 39 45 47 59 1 1 1 1 1 19 18 22 23 25 0 0 0 0 1 8 10 13 13 16 Ro/Ro Mixed Container and Ro/Ro Mixed Container and Barge Carrier Barge Carrier Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Table 5 USSR: Fast-Turnaround Liner Vessels Suitable for Transoceanic Services Deadweight (tons) Container Capacity (TEUS) b Speed (knots) Number in Service 31 December 1984 Total Deadweight (tons) Total Container Capacity (TEUS) 49 823,320 41,076 Total fully cellular 27 380,000 19,756 container ships Kapitan Gavrilov 16,000 940 21.6 8 128,000 7,520 Khudozhnik Saryan 14,500 732 20.8 10 5 47,000 2,100 60,000 3,693 148,000 6,192 a Including only vessels larger than 7,500 DWT and excluding multipurpose ships. b Twenty-foot equivalent units. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Working Paper Confidential Table 6 Disposition of Soviet Transoceanic Cellular Container, Roll-on/Roll-off, and Barge-Carrying Ships Employment 30 April 1981 Container Ro/Ro Barge- Total Container Ro/Ro Liner (by route) carrying Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-South Asia or Southeast Asia/Japan 7 9 0 0 9 Soviet Baltic-Western Euro - t pe eas coast 0 Canada and/or Caribbean Soviet Baltic-Western Europe and/or 0 Mediterranean 0 2 1 0---- 3 Sovet Baltic-Mediterranean Europe- 0 Australia-New Zealand Soviet Black Sea-South Asia or Japan/Southeast Asia-Red Sea-Mediterranean 7 0 Soviet Black Sea-Mediterranean and/or 0 Cuba or Red Sea Japan-Southeast Asia-Australia 4 Japan-Soviet Far East 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 Tramping coastal trade, unknown and 0 0 other 0 0 0 0 __ 0 0 Employment 31 December 1983 Ro/Ro Barge- Total Container Ro/Ro Barge- Total Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-South Asia or Southeast Asia/Japan 11 11 12 0 0 12 Soviet Baltic-Western Europe-Canadian east coast and/or Caribbean 0 2 0 4 0 4 Soviet Baltic-Western Europe and/or Mediterranean 2 Soviet Baltic-Mediterranean Europe- Australia-New Zealand 0 Soviet Black Sea-South Asia or Japan/ Southeast Asia-Red Sea-Mediterranean 2 Soviet Black Sea-Mediterranean and/or Cuba or Red Sea 0 Japan-Southeast Asia-Australia 4 Japan-Soviet Far East 3 3 0 0 3 Tramping coastal trade, unknown and other 1 0 0 1 1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6 Confidential Confidential Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2009/11/30: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000304210001-6