INDO-PAKISTANI RELATIONS: SOFT-PEDALING DIFFERENCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP85T01058R000506650001-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 27, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 15, 1985
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP85T01058R000506650001-4.pdf190.58 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85T01058R000506650001-4 Central Intelligence Agency Washington. D. C.20505 DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE t G-~ Jib 25X1 15 July 1985 Indo-Pakistani Rel ations: Soft-Pedaling Differences SUMMARY Tensions have eased slightly between India and Pakistan since Rajiv Gandhi succeeded his mother, but the differences on regional as well as bilateral issues continue to reflect enduring national security concerns. Indian fears center on Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, its acquisition of sophisticated conventional arms from the United States, and its alleged assistance to Sikh dissidents. Islamabad in turn believes that India's quest for regional dominance challenges its stability and even its survival. The two countries' visceral mistrust of each other is likely to impede significant rapprochement, at least in the near term. Relations between India and Pakistan have been more cordial under Rajiv Gandhi than under his mother. Rajiv and President Zia have already met twice- -at I ndi ra' s funeral and again at Chernenko's--and their discussions, described by both sides as upbeat, have spurred efforts by each to ease tensions: -- Following Zia's decision earlier this year to try the Sikh hijackers of two Indian airliners--welcomed by Rajiv as a first step toward reducing This paper was prepared byl (Office of Near Eastern and South Asian Analysis. Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, State Dept. review completed AIM 85- SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85T01058R000506650001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000506650001-4 strains--New Delhi agreed to resume the bilateral talks that Indira broke off last summer. -- Rajiv's decision to shift the principal brief for Pakistani affairs from his mother's hardline adviser, G. Parthasarthy, to Foreign Secretary Bhandari, a former schoolmate of his Pakistani counterpart, will remove a significant irritant from the relationship. The replacement of India's abrasive Ambassador in Islamabad, whose tour has come to an end, also will help. Since February the two countries have resumed intermittent talks between high-level as well as working level Foreign Ministry officials. Early this month high-level meetings of the Joint Commission were held in New Delhi. Established in 1982, the Joint Commission focuses on expanding bilateral trade, communications, tourism, and cultural exchanges. In addition, the two foreign secretaries have met several times at meetings of regional organizations, the Nonaligned Movement, and the United Nations. Later this month, senior Indian and Pakistani officials are scheduled to meet again to Abiding Mutual Mistrust New Delhi's doubts about Pakistani intentions remain the major obstacle to significant rapprochement: -- The Pakistani nuclear program and--to a lesser extent--US arms aid to Pakistan remain stumbling blocks, and Raj i v' s statements in public and in private suggest he is as worried about the former as Indira was. -- For Rajiv, as for his mother, suspicion of Pakistani involvement with Sikh extremists in Punjab is a major impediment to a breakthrough in Foreign Secretary Bhandari' s comments to Under Secretary Ikl e in early May probably were meant to remind Washington before Rajiv's visit that New Del hi views Z i a' s regime and its regional policies--including its security relationship with the United States and its stance on Afghanistan--as a threat to Indian interests. Bhandari said that: -- India was proceeding "step by step very cautiously" to "cool down the atmosphere" with Pakistan because Islamabad in the past has not shown a sustained commitment to improving relations. -- Afghan refugees in Pakistan are causing "great panic" and adding to the country's "volatility." -- New Delhi believes Islamabad's role in aiding the Afghan insurgency could provoke Soviet efforts to destabilize Pakistan--to the detriment of India's interests. -- Pakistan's military might must be reduced to alleviate Kabul's fear that Islamabad would launch an attack if Soviet troops were to withdraw. 2 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000506650001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000506650001-4 Even so, the shift in Rajiv's rhetoric on Pakistan while he was in Washington- -where his complaints about US arms sales to Islamabad focused on the diversion of India's economic resources caused by the arms race with Pakistan, not on questions about Pakistan's right to acquire arms--could indicate new willingness to try a more conciliatory line. 25X1 Pakistan, for its part, still fears that India's desire for regional preeminence threatens Pakistan's survival. Islamabad fears Indo-Soviet collaboration to weaken Pakistan--a development we consider unlikely because of divergent Indian and Soviet equities in South Asia. Some Pakistanis know that New Del hi wants Pakistan intact as a buffer against Soviet-occupied Afghanistan, but many still worry that Moscow will somehow manipulate India to attack Pakistan: -- Pakistanis also are concerned that India might take advantage of tensions along the Pakistani-Afghan border to intimidate Pakistan or that India mi ht launch a preemptive strike against Pakistan's nuclear facilities. 25X1 Slim Prospects for Improved Relations Islamabad continues to push for a bilateral nonaggression pact--first proposed by Zia in 1981 in response to New Delhi's arguments that Pakistan's newly acquired US arms threatened India. New Delhi is parrying Pakistani initiatives by pushing for progress on trade and cultural exchanges until tensions have eased further. Many influential Indians believe the 1972 Simla Agreement--in which Indira Gandhi and then-President Bhutto agreed to settle their countries' differences through bilateral talks, refrain from hostile propaganda, and avoid meddling in each other's county --is the most realistic basis for normalizing relations. 25X1 Still, New Delhi in our view wants to maintain at least the appearance of cooperation on a nonaggression pact in order to: -- Bolster its image of reasonableness and statesmanship as leader of the Non al i gned Movement. -- Remind Moscow that India is pursuing its own foreign policy line: -- Avoid complicating India's rel ations with the Gulf Arabs by appearing If the current dialogue does not again grind to a halt as a result of disagreements over the Sikhs or other contentious issues, the two sides will eventually have to wrestle with a deadlock for which no easy solution is in sight. In their 1982 counterproposal to Pakistan's nonaggression pact, the Indians insisted on conditions that, in Islamabad's view, impinge on Pakistan's sovereignty--such as asking Pakistan to forgo the right to take disputes to the United Nations and to commit itself never to allow foreign bases on its territory. 3 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000506650001-4 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000506650001-4 SUBJECT: Indo-Pakistani Rel ations: Soft-Pedaling Differences DDI /NESA/SO External Distribution: (15 July 1985) 25X1 Mr. Robert Peck, Deputy Assistant Secretary, NEA Bureau, Department of State, Room 6244, Washington, DC 20520 Mr. Ron Lorton, Deputy Director, Office of Analysis for Near East and South Asia, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Room 4636, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520 Internal Distribution: 1 - DDI 1 - DDI Registry 1 - NIO/NESA 1 - C/PES 1 - CPAS/ISS 1 - C/DDO/NE- 1 - PDB Staff 4 - CPAS/IMC/CB 1 - D/NESA 1 - DD/NESA 1 - C/NESA/PPS 1 - NESA/PPS 1 - C/NESA/SO 2 - NESA/SO/P 2 - NESA/SO/S 4 SECRET Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP85TO1058R000506650001-4