SECOND QUARTER - QUARTERLY REPORT - IMPROVE THE RETENTION RATE FOR EMPLOYEES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP86-00024R000100010008-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 14
• Document Creation Date: December 16, 2016
• Document Release Date: July 19, 2005
• Sequence Number: 8
• Publication Date: April 12, 1984
• Content Type: PERRPT

Approved For lease 2005/08/03 : CIA-RDP86-00020100010008-1
12 April 1984
Second Quarter - Quarterly Report
Improve the Retention Rate for Flnployees
FY 1984 - 5 OP/HRPS
OP/CAD
1. Activity This Period:
HRPS has produced a formal review covering Agency attrition for the
past five years. This review contains statistics and color graphics and
covers directorates and Career Services by subcategory.
Initial statistics have been compiled to begin analysis on separation
reasons and trends. This analysis will be aimed at occupation groups,
directorates, length of service, and age.
Our major problems, to date, have been the long delay in getting the
initial data dump from the database and other priority projects.
3. Status:
Proceeding approximately four weeks behind initial plan.
4. Plans for Next Period:
Complete in-depth analysis on separation reasons and trends and
recognize major attrition targets.
Approved For Release 2005/08/03 : CIA-RDP86-00024R000100010008-1
 Approved For Release 2005/08/03: CIA-RDP86-00024R000100010006fAT
OBJECTIVE AND ACTION PLAN
OBJECTIVE NO
OFFICE
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER
FY RESOURCE ESTIMATE
STATUS
PERIOD
.
Fr
+
FY 1984 - 5
H & 6p
^Ap
WKYR
DOLLARS
OBJECTIVE
OCT - DEC
Improve the quality of life for employee
JAN?MAR
APR - JUN
E. Improve retention rate for employees.
JUL ? 3EP
i EXCEEDING PLAN
= MEETING PLAN
< BEHIND PLAN
COMPLETION MONTH: SCHEDULED 0; ACTUAL X
ACTION PLAN (Mil0stones)
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
"Develop data on attrition rates:
OX
By organization, to oanponent level
OX
?By SD, to panel level
OX
"By subcategory (by OrG and by SD)
OX
"Resolve data discrepancies
OX
"Develop data on the causes of attrition:
0..
.0
?By organization
OX
?By SD
OX
?By subcategory
OX
?By occupation
0..
.0
"By service
0..
.0
?13y age
0..
.0
0
?By exit interviews
?By contact with component & Career Service
0
representatives
?Prepare a strategic plan to reduce attrition:
0
?Size major attrition targets
0
?Develop attrition reduction alternatives
0
?Assess value of exit interviews
0
0
?Employee counselling
0..
.0
0
0
?Assess value of vacancy notices in relation to
true. separations
0
"'Determine desirability of reactivating the employee
available for reassignment program for employees
contemplating resignation
0
?Oznpare Agency and private sector benefits
0
?Re endat.,ons to management for improving the
retention o emp
loyees
Approved For Release 2005/08/03:
A-RE
P86-(
0024
001 1
00101
08-1
FORM 8629 Or OOLI OI'cv10"6
w I rIera
 Approved Fo0lease 2005/08/03 : CIA-RDP86-00029 00100010008-1
Second Quarter - Quarterly Report
Time-In-Grade Consistency
STAT FY 1984 - 6 OP/HRPS
OP/ID
1. Activity This Period:
Statistics which provide information on directorate time-in-grade
experience have been reviewed and several inconsistencies and patterns noted.
A survey of directorate personnel officers has been taken to document policies
and rationales for these inconsistencies. All tabular data and graphic
illustrations have been prepared and recommendations formulated for policy
changes.
2. Problems:
None encountered to date and none anticipated.
3. Status:
A final report with recommendations is being reviewed in PA&E and
should be released shortly.
Approved For Release 2005/08/03 : CIA-RDP86-00024R000100010008-1
 Approved For Re least 2?ef9We3A:8VI1-P16 -0 4R000100010008-1
OBJECTIVE NO.
FY 1984 - 6
pP/HRPS & ID
OBJECTIVE Establish Consistency in application of Agency personne
B. Review time-in-grade policies and practices.
i EXCEEDING PLAN
MEETING PLAN
< BEHIND PLAN
?Develop statistics showing oaponent time-in-grade
experience for FY 1983.
?By sex, by grade, by subcategory, by SD
?Survey Directorate Personnel Officers to determine
the ocnrponent minimum, and working, time-in-grade
guidelines.
?Identify areas of differences in policies or experience
or both.
?Prepare a proposal which provides recmrp-ndations for
explaining or resolving component time-in-grade
variations.
DEC JAN FCB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
ox
ox
FOg . 09SOLITE -PEVIOUS
127YM 3629 29 EDITIONS
 ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY