MEETING WITH NCPC TECHNICAL STAFF

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP86-00244R000100040006-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: May 21, 1999
• Sequence Number: 6
• Publication Date: March 20, 1972
• Content Type: MFR

Approved For Relse/11106 : CIA-RDP&6-00244R0'00040006-6
20 March 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Meeting with NCPC Technical Staff
On this date the undersigned met with Messrs. Hromanik and MacKinnon
of the National Capital Planning Commission to discuss technical requirements
for a master plan presentation. Mr. Hromanik led off with the statement that
if the Agency is to meet the July hearing date (advanced to 29 ,June 1972), we
must have a complete submission by 15 May. This includes graphic, minimal
tabular information, and narrative information. A colored presentation copy
need not be submitted until the actual hearing dale (depends on garage submission
date).
A copy of the National Bureau of Standards Master Plan was shown as an
example of a master plan which compares close to the scale and complexity of
our Headquarters complex. Mr. Hromanik informed me that this example was
a good illustration of the minimum four-drawing presentation. It consisted of
two sets of drawings. One set indicated existing conditions and the second set
indicated proposed conditions. Each set consisted of the four following draw-
ings:
- Land Use Plan (inclusive of site only)
Development Plan (may show topography, square footage count, and
personnel)
- Circulation Plan (vehicular, pedestrian, parking count)
Landscape Plan (may show topography)
Mr. Hromanik stated that drawings other than the four basic as mentioned
above are for the purposes of clarity and are not considered a prerequisite for
submission and review. Drawings in this category would be site sections, popula-
tion distribution, utilities diagram renderings, etc. Only the two sets of basic
drawings (the 4 as mentioned) become permanent additions to the Commission
files.
Approved For Release 20 OT/OS'; rtCIA-RE ,"100244R00010004p006-6
 Approved For Release 2001/11/08 : CIA RDQ$6 00244E 00 100040006-6
SUBJECT: Meeting with NCPC Technical Staff
Mr. Hromanik also presented the undersigned with an "example" copy
of an environmental statement and also a copy of an environmental description.
These examples should serve as rough guides for our use in preparing a
comparable document. 25X1A
2
Approved For Release 2001/11/08 : CIA-RDP86-00244R000100040006-6
 ^ UWLASt 1'JJ d Fo n 'TERNAL
~-R~kofieOW/11/08 : CIA-RDP86
W
^ SECRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
Chief
Building Planning Staff
OL
3553
,
,
DATE
21 March 1972
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
DATE
building)
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
Director of Logistics
Confirming discussions of this
morning, I feel that the Agency's
2? Assistant DeputyDirector f
or Suppo
t
position with NCPC would be enhanced
Rm 7D18, Hqs
with the submission of site cross-sec-
tions which we have prepared and are
3. Dire of Logistics
on hand. These sections show clearly
Rm 1206, Ame wig
the low profile concept of future Hqs.
cam
us develo
ment vis-a-
is
-
p
p
sur
v
4.
rounding topography.
5.
JAAR
7Z
to 3
L
2 4
AR 1972
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
FORM USE PREVIOUS INTERNAL UNCLASSIFIED
3-62 610 EDITIONS ^ SECRET CONFIDENTIAL ^ USE ONLY ^
4 184, MW06-6