ESTIMATED COST OF PRINTING REVISED GEHA BOOKLETS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86-00964R000200010066-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 1, 2002
Sequence Number: 
66
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 10, 1958
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86-00964R000200010066-3.pdf104.12 KB
Body: 
STATINTL Approved For Relpase 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP86-00964R00@?0010066-3 December 1958 fastened with a removable 2,000 fastener 51000 POE: Chief, Benefits and Casualty Division/OP a sstimted Cost of Printing Revised {fit. Booklets 1. In accordance with the discussion in the meeting with yesterday, I obtained the following estimated costs of reprinting our GA booklets. These figures are based on appro mately 50 pages of material. (a) Loose-leaf r hard cover - (b) Stapled - permanent 2,O00 575 booklet - present form 5, c00 1, 250 2. I was only interested in the loose-leaf figures contained (a) above. However, since they gave me the others, I thought VOU14 Pass them on to you. It would seem that these figures in (a) we quite reasonable and help us to get approval to have them printed in loose-leaf form. STATINTL G ,5/k 7/!;7 STATINTL Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP86-00964R000200010066-3 December 8, 1958 STATINTL vice rea en Government Employees Health Assn. 1.0. Box 463 ~?ir3sr;inE-ton 4, D.C. STATINTL Dear Al has asked me to write you concerning your November 19, 1958 letter. You will recall in your discussion with Al, it was brought out that there are some shortcomings in the surgical schedules now being used by the Industry. The matter of primary concern has been those areas where the relative values of surgical procedures are no longer realistic in the light of current surgical advance- ments and practices. Recently, a number of studies have been made with respect to the relative values of surgical procedures. Per- r,aps the most well-known study was made in California. I am attaching a copy of the California Relative Value Study which may be of interest to you. The indufstry has not, as yet, adopted a standard !'relative value" type schedule, although there appears very definitelyy to be a trend in that direction. This Company is in a position to issue this type of schedule at this time upon request, even though we have not established a standard schedule. Undoubtedly, premium rates f thi t f or a ype o a surgical schedule will need to be STATINTLI adjusted upward. i in the case of the $62.50 reimbursement tol this would certainly be one of those areas - . Unfortunately, the operation performed is specifically listed in the schedule, and there is no way of adjusting the allowance with- out making what would be considered a clear deviation from the cc'ntract terms. I am not sure that I have answered your question satisfactorily. My answer to your question concerning a new surgical schedule is predicated on the belief that you were not interested in-any immediate revision of .the present schedule. If this is not correct, please let us know. Sincerely, +J Edson C r~` W ,, r. m ace Grpu , liv 74~lr~ar(W 3 e r l.~if'' ./~s~sstlar~tr+ frr,ii~fiaiiy (/i~F G rr~etirvr .~wvrtr~t~ Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP86-00964R000200010066-3