AGENCY MILITARY RESERVE UNITS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86-01129R000100030014-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 12, 2005
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 19, 1981
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86-01129R000100030014-5.pdf153.86 KB
Body: 
Is J, ICAET' Approved Fd lease 2005/08/22 : CIA-RDP86-0112)0100030014-5 MhMORANIDUt FOR: Director- of PerscnneJ. l OR.11 SUBJECT Agency Military Reserve. Units 1. The Agency Reserve units were established in the 1950's based on a str.r)ng belief that military personnel would be required during any eas r ency or a. full mobilization. The. Agency had great. numbers of World War- 11 and i:.oreax). vete=r_ans, as civilian employees, who were holding reserve co:rnu.ss:i.ons. Any mobilization at this time would have created havoc. for the Agency unless a mechanism existed within the Agency for their active partici.pati on in the military reserves and for any future mobilization. Many of these reservists were in key positions and they had a vested interest of 8 to 1.2 year,.,, in the military reserves. Coupled with this group was a half hearted attempt to establish war plans for the utilization. of Al ency rc servists. The p' an . cit.e.d. Ia.rge numbers of military personnel that would be needed upon -mobil_izati.on and these figures were impressive. Another:- consideration was the. Draft and the Agency was hiring numerous pe~opl.e with mi 1.itary reserve obligat.Ions and they were, accommodated in these reserve. units with a mob .lizatlon. assi4g)1mT:e7").t to the Agency. Throughout O)e-sc years the Agency Reserve units have functioned rather smoothly and they were secure reserve a.~sigx)ment_s for those who der; .r.ed to remain active. (U) 2. The benefits to the Agency fo.r sponsoring these units ilnclude complete career control (civilian/military) over the :Lndi.v:idua.l_ reservist:. Any cover or security considerations can be handled without difficulty. Another benefit the Agency gains is the related experience of active duty military training received by these people. Although difficultt, to pin--point any component gaining a. precise benefit, collectively this training;, in many cases, ties, in with the individual's civilian position. Perhaps the strongest benefit to the Agency is the availability of a pool. of individuals with expertise in both the. Agency and military operations for ut.i.] ization in any mob-.lization. .,:Led with these benefit:,-, is a sicl'e product of. public relations and the contribution Agency reservists make to their respective military service. (U) 3. Despite the benefits there are minor problems for the Agency associated with the reserve units. Covert and overt people. are mixed together in their: military active and inactive duty training.,,. Covert: personnel are known to military departments. Military records mai.!)tainccl by the. services raf.lect unit designation and can easily be traced bacl,. to Agency ties. The longer Agency WARNING NOTICE: S1:NSI'TIVTE I.NTELlI.GENCE SOURCE'S AND T?il ;TU.ODS l.NVOLVEI) 25X1 Approved For Release 2005/66k ~K:1'CIA-RDP86-01129R000100030014-5 Approved Fo1Mi ease 2005 1812121: CIA-RDP86-0112 0100030014-5 units exist: the greater the risk of compromise of covert personnel. The training and administration of Agen.c:y reserve units and personnel creates minor problems for the Agency. Initially, when the Agency activated these units the training consisted of primarily unconventional warfare subjects. Then it progressed to counterinsurgency and eventually driftcd into a general subjects program. E 4. The military departments have demonstrated a casual interest with the Agency's reserve units but would support any reasonable request from the Agency to maintain the units. They seldom questioned or requested justi_fi-- cation for the units. Perhaps the absence of computers and the war in Vietnam contributed to a lack of interest and a more thorough review of how the Agency was ut:i_1izi.ng military reserves and how they planned to use them in a wartime situation. (U) 5. There are. no specific wartime plans to justify the Agency sponsored reserve units. The plans do not exist and without an approved Agency-JCS plan or agree- ment as to how, where, and why military reservists would be utilized during wartime the units cannot he justified, nor should they he supported by the military departments. (U) 6. After heavily weighing all known facts and based on my close association with both the Agency and Military Departments, and considering the guidelines for this paper, it would be my recommendation to discontinue the Agency's Military Reserve Program. The discontinuation would create individual problems for the reservists but they would not be penalized because of the numerous training opportunities available with otter military reserve units. The premise that any Agency reservist mobilized with all. outside Reserve unit will be lost to the Agency during mobilization is questionable. The Military has an excellent record of assigning military personnel to this Agency on a by-name basis. The same would be done in any emergency. In any event, the total assigned reserve strength if lost to the military certainly would not create a catastrophe for the Agency. Incidentally, the numbers keep going down. (U) 7. During this study I talked with I land discussed the Agency 25X1 Reserve Program. his comments and interest in retaining these reserve units were appreciated and carefully considered. Notwithstanding his strong interest and his suggestion that plans would be prepared and sent to JCS within six. months to justify the retention of these units, I would recommend that Agency Military Reserve Units, including Army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force be discontinued no later than 1 October 1982. It will take time for Agency reservists to locate suitable outside reserve assignments. Military Reserve Headquarters are equipped to handle reassignments expeditiously. I see no major problems for MPB in locating suitable assignments for Agency reservists by working closely with these reserve hee.dquar.ts:::s. However, an early decision should be made on this recommendation in order La have the lead time for MPB to affect changes by 1 October 1982. The th[..king, of the 1950's for mobilization has changed dramatically for Lhe 19ti?'s and to prolong the existence of these units will only postpone the decision to terminate them. (U) 25X1 Approved For Release 200/A4: CIA-RDP86-01129R000100030014-5