OUR INTELLIGENCE MESS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86B00338R000400560006-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 15, 2008
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 2, 1984
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86B00338R000400560006-3.pdf326.37 KB
Body: 
t IE 3424 1` C ORES IONAIL RECORD isof Remarks OU,~iR INTELLIGENCENR MESS E Approved For Release 2008/09/15: CIA-RDP86B00338R000400560006-3 points that they do not even begin to realize how their action may be im- pacting on the lives of U.S. intelli- gence and foreign service personnel overseas or the thousands of people in the Nicaraguan resistance movement to which the United States has made a commitment. Creating a new joint oversight panel along these lines would diminish thC possibilities for partisan posturing and significantly reduce the number of in- dividuals having access to sensitive in- formation, thus minimizing the risk of damaging, unauthorized disclosures. At the same time, it would retain in a more effective and concentrated manner the essential of congressional oversight over the activities of our in- telligence agencies and preclude the possibility of executive branch intelli- gence components playing one com- mittee off against the other. Practical considerations played into my-decision also. The two committees reflect different perspectives, and they frequently do not focus on the same matters and there is hardly any inter- action or coordination. Another thing to bear in mind in this connection is that Congress has increasingly insisted IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 2, 1984 o Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I intro- duced legislation yesterday, House Joint Resolution 633, to eliminate the House and Senate Intelligence Com- mittee and create a streamlined Joint Committee on Intelligence. I want to share with my colleagues my reasons for this legislation. I originally proposed this idea in my weekly district column on May 18, 1984 following the furor over the mining of the Nicaragua harbors (see CONGRESSIONAL RECORD June 6, 1984, E2606). This debacle prompted me ask, "Is Congress capable of practicing re- sponsible congressional oversight of intelligence activities, once those ac- tivities are viewed as an integral part of a foreign policy that has become controversial and the subject of parti- san debate?" I have shared my reasons in a state- ment today to the Senate Temporary Select Committee to study the Senate Committee System, and I quote from that statement: We cannot afford to allow what presently masquerades as Congressional intelligence oversight to continue any longer. With poli- tics intruding so heavily on the process, it is time to give serious thought to merging the existing intelligence committees into a joint committee composed equally of Republicans and Democrats who, in addition to the req- uisite trustworthiness, competence and re- sponsibility, also possess the rare restraint to subordinate political considerations to the national interest. A serious question with dangerous implications presents itself: Is our democratic form- of government unable to keep any secrets, no, matter how sensitive to our national inter- ests? As we all know, the calculated, politically motivated leaking of highly sensitive information has become a Washington art form, and one that is not confined to Congress alone. It appears the only way to mount a successful covert operation these days is for such an activity to have the nearly unanimous support,of both In- telligence Committees and the in- volved agencies of the intelligence community. Anything short of that is doomed to failure, as opponents will selectively leak material to their ac- quaintances in the media with the ex- pressed purpose of torpedoing the op- eration. Moreover, as recent press dis- closures clearly demonstrate, you can count on a flurry of these leaks just before anticipated congressional action on the disputed issue. What is especially disturbing is that those who axe doing the leaking prob- ably have never stopped to think what the short- and long-term implications of their revelations will be with re- spect to U.S. Intelligence efforts, as well as to U.S. foreign policy. They are so preoccuppied with scoring political upon being consulted and briefed by the executive -branch concerning na- tional security and foreign policy ques- tions. A consolidated oversight panel would provide one point of contact for consultation and briefings in those in- stances where time is of the essence in a fast breaking crisis situation.o W BOOST FOR ALCOHOL FUEL PRODUCTION HON. THOMAS A. DASCHLE OF SOUTH DAKOTA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 2, 1984 o Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. Speaker, "Out of Gas" and "No Gas.Today" signs sprung up overnight across the Nation in 1978 in response to a second oil em- bargo, gasohol became widely known to the motoring public. Gasohol, a blend of 10 percent ethanol and 90 percent gasoline; helped satisfy our Nation's need for transportation fuel by extending limited supplies of gaso- line. At that time, alcohol fuel was chiefly regarded by the general public as an important gasoline extender. In time, as the supply of gasoline in- creased, the service stations signs which advertised gasohol disappeared. With this disappearance, many people incorrectly believed alcohol fuel had also vanished from the marketplace. Alcohol fuel didn't disappear from the marketplace and in fact the demand and use for alcohol fuel in- creased. In addition to reducing oil im- ports and providing expanded and stable markets for our agricultural products, ethanol also proved to be an excellent octane enhancer. From virtual nonexistence only 5 years ago, our domestic alcohol fuel August 2, L984 industry will produce a projected 400 millions of ethanol this year, a 40-fold increase since 1978. Increased need for higher octane motor fuels, as a result of newer high compression engines and lead-In-gasoline standard changes, has accounted for this increased demand and use of domestically pro- duced renewable ethanol fuel. The recently announced proposal by the Environment Protection Agency to reduce lead in gasoline from 1.1 grams to 0.1 grams per gallon, which recog- nizes the harmful environmental ef- fects of lead in the atmosphere, pro- vides another significant boast for al- cohol fuel production because lead is primarily used in gasoline as an octane enhancer. Ethanol, of course, is not the only :additive -available to replace lead and increase the octane rating of motor fuels. MTBE, Oxinol, BTX and other so-called oxygenates, like etha- nol, can also be used to increase fuel octane 'rating, but in -comparison to these other additives, ethanol offers many advantages. Ethanol is environ- mentally benign and medically safe and can be produced from our abun- dant agricultural production. Getting the lead out, as the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed, pro- vides an important new boost for fuel alcohol production and use.o HONK IF YOU LOVE ED DONOHOE lHIO1. ,9III 1dOW1 Y OF WASHINGTON IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 2, 1924 o Mr. LOWRY of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I could not let the retirement of the most colorful pen in the North- west's labor circles go by without ex- tending my own words of congratula- tions. Ed Donohoe, the editor of the Washington Teamster, has kept the State of Washington's establishment on its toes. His weekly column has been chuckled over-usually by those not subjected to its coverage, vilified- often by those who are covered, but always read and enjoyed. I might add he has taken the hide off me a few times when I deserved it also. I have had several opportunities to work with Ed and have the highest ad- miration for his work. While he will be missed as editor of the Teamster, I'm certain that Ed will continue to play an active role in the Northwest. To use Emmett Watson s words, another great Seattle area scribe, "We need guys like Ed. The city is too mono- chromatic." Mr. Speaker, I would like to insert into the RECORD the following article on Ed Donohoe's retirement from the Washington Teamster: HONK IF You LOVE ED DONOHOE (By Joe Mooney) By a special proclamation of 'the Honora- ble John Spellman, governor of Washington state, Sunday, April 1, 1984, has been set Approved For Release 2008/09/15: CIA-RDP86B00338R000400560006-3 Approved For Release 2008/09/15: CIA-RDP86B00338R000400560006-3 ? August 2, 1984 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - Extensions of Remarks IV. COMPARABILITY OF PAY OF FEDERAL WHITE- COLLAR EMPLOYEES The Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 is a major factor in setting Federal salaries; it established the pro- cedure for annual, more or less auto- matic, implementation of comparabil- ity. In effect, it ruled that Federal white-collar pay should roughly equal private sector pay for similar jobs. May Federal employees are con- cerned that the basic soundness of the Comparability Act might be under- mined by increased criticism of the Federal pay scales and by recommen- dations for alternative proposals that are impractical, untested, or expen- sive. The current administration's atti- tude toward Federal pay is demoraliz- ing and is raising a sense of insecurity and unrest among Federal employees. VI. COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS Since 1967, the majority of employ- ees and retirees in both the public and private sector have had their wages and annuities aligned with the Con- sumer Price Index [CPI]. For the re- tired, whose primary source of income is an annuity or pension, cost-of-living adjustments [COLA's] are essential in order to remain solvent. I support reg- ular and equitable COLA's for Federal .retirees. VII. CONTRACTING OUT FEDERAL-WORK AND POSITIONS Over the past several years there has been an increased emphasis on moving workload and positions from the. Federal Government to the pri- vate sector. This thrust has come from the executive branch of the Govern- ment, primarily the Office of Manage- ment and Budget [OMB]. The pres- sure to contract out appears to be po- litically motivated and intended solely for the purpose of reducing the size of Government and expanding the pri- vate sector. Federal employees are not opposed to contracting out certain jobs or func- tions if it makes sense from a practical and economic point of view. I suggest requiring each agency to provide a ra- tionale for contracting or not contract- ing out specific functions. The Federal Government relies on certain principles in order to function in an open, democratic manner. Among these principles is the, theory of service and dedication to a common cause. Our public officials and civil servants fulfill this noble cause when they choose to give up the larger bene- j;'he:.fits available in the private sector. ~, =JVithout them, our Government would ;ease to function. It is only fair and wise that we bestow upon them the benefits that they have rightfully earned. Let us not forget this when we meet again to decide the future of the Civil Service Retirement System. Thank you.? HON. THOMAS J. TAUKE OF IOWA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, August 2, 1984 ? Mr. TAUKE. Mr. Speaker, as I and my colleagues have done previously as participants in the Congressional Vigil for Soviet Jewry, I would like to speak again on behalf of the many Jewish citizens suffering persecution in the Soviet Union. While the Soviet Gov- ernment continues to disregard the human rights and religious freedom of their Jewish countrymen, I will con- tinue to bring their sad story before my colleagues and all Americans who, thankfully, know no such persecutions in this country. It is clear that the mistreatment of Soviet Jews is a very real part of Soviet society. One does not have to look very far or very hard to uncover new incidents where the Soviet Gov- ernment has succeeded in ruining the lives of Jewish citizens through har- assment. There are many convenient ways that the Soviet Government has mas- tered to deny this select group the human rights all people should enjoy. We hear stories of Soviet Jews being exiled to labor camps. We hear stories of Soviet Jews being denied admission to universities. And we hear stories of Soviet Jews being forced to stay in a land where anti-Semitism is promoted by the media and in literature. Consider, for example, the plight of Abe Stolar and his family, who have suffered greatly at the hands of the Soviet Government. Abe and his sister Eva were born in Chicago, where their parents had settled after fleeing tsar- ist Russia. In 1936, after returning to. Moscow, Abe's father was arrested during one of Stalin's purges and has never been heard from since. Abe's grandmother and aunt were also ar- rested and sent to Siberia, where they both died in concentration camps. Abe himself was expelled from the Moscow School of Arts and made to work as a hard laborer. In 1941, he joined the Russian army, serving on the front line until the end of the war. Abe survived the war, and Eva sur- vived the Holocaust; she managed to emigrate to Israel some years later. In 1974, Abe, his wife Gitta, and their son Mikhail were granted visas to join Eva in Israel. Inn order to leave, they were required to sell their apart- ment, relinquish Soviet citizenship and pack all of their belongings off to Israel. One year later, with only a few small suitcases, they were prevented from boarding a plane. On June 19, 1975, they were told that Gitta's visa was not in order; the family was pro- hibited from leaving because of a fab- ricated claim that she had had access to secret information at the time of her retirement 2 years before. Twelve E 3423 days later, they were informed that they could not leave the Soviet Union for 2 years on grounds of "security." Even though their pensions were rein- stated by the Soviet Government, Abe and Gitta refused to take up their Soviet citizenship again. Without a place to live, Abe and his family were put into an apartment be- longing to someone else. They have been living in that empty apartment on the meager allowance the govern- ment pays them to remain in the Soviet Union. Mikhail, Abe's son, was unable to get into an institute of higher education because of the circumstances in which they are living. Threats have been made that Mikhail will be called for 2 years of military service. If he is called to serve, the family's visas would be delayed again at least another 6 or 7 years, or refused entirely on the same convenient grounds of "security." Mik- hail applied to emigrate to Israel alone and wait for his parents, but he was told that he could not leave the U.S.S.R. because of his mother's sup- posed knowledge of secret informa- tion. In 1978, Abe wrote three letters to Mr. Brezhnev, asking that his war service be counted favorably toward the family's emigration application. These letters were never even ac- knowledged. The Stolar family is sub- ject to constant petty harassment from Soviet authorities. They are now being sued for the price of their coop- erative apartment. This is the apart- ment the authorities put them in when the family was first kept from leaving the Soviet Union. The rightful owners'want to get Abe's family evict- ed, which would leave them on the streets. Meanwhile, Eva had been soliciting the help of friends in California in the hope that her brother's family would someday be able to join her there. She campaigned vigorously in Israel and America, and as she was about to leave for a meeting on her brother's behalf, she collapsed and within a few min- utes, died. I would like to believe that the fight against the mistreatment of Soviet Jews will not die with Eva. In Febru- ary 1981, Abe and Gitta celebrated their silver wedding anniversary, and in December Abe reached his 73d birthday. He remains cheerful, reso- lute and undaunted, still hoping to escape the grip of the Soviet Govern- ment that continues to deny his family their visas. The case of the Abe Stolar family is but one of many cases. I urge the Soviet Union to stop persecuting the Stolar's, and other Soviet Jews. We in the United States must continue to call attention to these blatant denials of human rights. I urge my colleagues and the American people to join me in protesting the abuses of the Soviet Government.* Approved For Release 2008/09/15: CIA-RDP86B00338R000400560006-3