THE CIP APPROVED PROGRAM FOR FY1971, AS REFLECTED IN TOD II-1969: A CASE EXAMPLE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 6
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 18, 2005
• Sequence Number: 32
• Publication Date: August 18, 1969
• Content Type: MF

25
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
IIIMIANZUK FOR:
MEM ?
SIM
it August 19,11
agg Me* 8. Programs,
Ths CD approved Psoiraa tor 7f 1971, as Ratioctos
la TM 32.19691 A Cue lbasplo
1.73os cro up* dsla prowidod by DIA Aar TOD 34-3969 bows -Dos
promoiso2 osaLlaii the stimaiord TOR ostipot forogo. This
f s
25).(1 :=od to din
or Impost. o shoat &rasa ',oho imp a t et* nwort ?, 444.
arg tie first wait
ire
2.' attombod
the top 20 vats in C
donors, ant it slaw the
mist istalligloss aniztvi
is hosed urn them ditto. ItAWL-4'114
bailed Aqui a arlivirica or total Ti
to *ugh taw uott$ upset; vor
log targets.
Thir Immo et this lasertlpotloa was to worlds sane tilisigt
as to ths potarldal VIM or * It)D data boos la Motors lapartmart of
Wawa WWII radar Plrnalage ThIP CNN 41.11101.r'rea44.1 litre is
of mores. m437 u133aslestirm or the magistr St oaosommtos that
ma beproIlr from mob * data boas sad gat mill bo ommintlia
beiliting nattiosr Datum DIllentellitge Pisa sot CUP usobsast
4. This impart ma porgarod in rowan to laturost oxorossol
isr ? Prodolho's stair. emionwroal37. I ea sending this notext?
to R. R. Morrison In Antialstzatios.
flow of talk Dizootat ort emoital lattolliguest
ellainmay TOD 0owaltter
Attarizmats:
IlMeo, sums solsjooto dtd 33 Aug 614 with Aims A sad Y.:.
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
Mit
18 Aust :969
11012A1Oni Assistant Secretory of Defense for Adidatrastion
(Attu: It. Z. liarrioam)
The CIP-Opprowed Propos tor FT 1971 M Reflorted
In TOD 31-1969t A Came ample.
let fervardiag the attached report in mimes to raw
of Interest sad in the hope *fat it otcy assist in ytta-
Aselsiass with reepeot to the 0111111111a Cns Peeler problem. This-
emelysis was eastorled out by I and the DCIATIPt
Staff
2.The overt war also Wands yom ilith same imeishts me to
potential use of a MD data hese In raters Depertmest of /*Penne
pogrom revisit plasaing. ease mammplo preseated here is, of'
foam, may we illustration or the variety of lafbreatioo Mama
ass be proSaised from each a data hoot GM the* will be maseatier
in building a aralti-yeer Demme Istellietawn Mat sad Crall
ampoheatme.
3. IN, will to plissood to talk with you farther shoot this ewe
eampple end oleo Shoat the future toceder deemlogemmt of this anrt
or delta bees.
to
Otatrerrestly I am sending iads moat and all its szetandiettz
Plans
ant Pri.DIA.
Oellos
at the Direallee of Contra lat
Ohalomemo ite Camdttee
Attodbonats:
Dim, moms subject, 4t4 13 Aug 69, withAppoodloss A sod 4-
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : p41IDP86M00612R000100060032-3
:1
ME1,10RANDU1I FOR Tfifi,' RECORD
SUBJECT: The CIP Approved. Program for FY 1971 as Reflected 311
TOD II: A Case Example.
1. The attached M.1)les and Source Data (machine runs) are
examples of the -CIF outpt data from TOD II.
2. The tables and data are for the CIP Approved Program for
FY 1971 (1 January 1969 PYDP update).
3. The basic purpose of the tables and source data attv.hmeris
is to demonstrate the capability of TOD II in a specific pro-gem
involving the selection and assembly of data by various TOD rl
cost, manpower, functional and target categories.
4. The prdblam was to determine "a manageable portion" of
the CIP for a rapid program review. The approach used in alyzin;
the TOD data was as follows:
(a) The totality of the CIP in FY 1971 is represented
by 154 Reporting Entities
and activities) expending
oranizational units
people. The TOA rank ordering of these RE's indicates resour
dominance by a relatively mall number of RE's.
(b) The analysls involved determining the relation of tfe
Top 20 RE's (in terrnv of TOA outlay) in each of the key /ariatle
categories of resources, function and target. In other words,
answering the question as to whether the dominant group
(e.g., the Top 20 RE's) was also representative in each of the
variables shown by TOD and to what degree.
(c) In those instances (variable related) where dominan-e
of the Top 20 RE's was not maintained, the dominant BE 's were
determined and noted. 6
SECRET
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
Approved For Release 2006/02/07Q, CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
7
5. The method used (,cmorsbrabes that any croup of caLec_wv
variables in TOT) II can he selecbed and a determination 41adc as to
the optimal number of RE's(in termus of any resource category)
which will be required to:review dominant resources rela.',ed lo th(
selected variables. Thu,_; the "customer" can select a given
percentage of resources rclated to any group of variables (e.g.,
TOT) categories) and in a short period of time be given those_ (RE')
which provide an optimal resource correlation in terms of the
variables he has selected.
6. It can be seen that the TOT) data base can be queried in
terms of a large number of variables. This makes TO]) II recponsi-e
in providing a basic data input for almost any resource issue. Tie
visibility of the issue is enhanced by the number of ways the issue
can be looked at in te-c= of the TO]) categories.
7r This does not provide the intelligence resource evEal)atin
but it does go a long way in providing an evaluation effort 16Ab
a frame of reference for the evaluation as well as indications of
many of the problem areas within it. In analysis, this is often-
times 50% of the solutiow,
8. It remains to be said that TOT) cannot and is not structured
to fulfill the data input role to the intelligerIce program evaluation
problem of those information systems supplying efficiency (intell gent 4
systems performance and capabilities), effectiveness (consumer need)
and target environment (foreign weapon system projections) criter._a
and data.
Attachments:
Appendix A - Tables
Appendix B - TO]) II Machine Runs
SECRET
-2-
ANDCl/NriE
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
25X1
SENDEEtAVILI,CtiECK 0 ?,;
_ ,
- AppliNef8A1-sig41 I 219a5n
,..,, .,
.. i ? er . r..1, ?;.: : : .11:,...,,:k: :
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
ow
TO
NAME AND ADDRESS
DATE
INITIALS
1
Agnes
ACTION
DIRECT REPLY
PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL
DISPATCH
RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT
FILE
RETURN
CONCURRENCE
INFORMATION
SIGNATURE
Remarks:
On 18 Aug 69 I sent Mr. Bross a memo (buck slip
attaching drafts of letters to ASD/Admin and
tcl 1 There was also attached a
report on legal site paper.
Please insert the attached as the first page
of the report (Tables 1,11,171). Remove and
destroy the original first page.
Thank you.
RN TO SENDER
HONE NO. DATE
Approved For Release 2006/02M-SWEDIMMOVIMO
FORM NO. 037 Use previous editions
1-67 G
GPO : 1968 0 - 297-542
(40)
00060032-3
00060032-3
25X1 Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3
Next 17 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2006/02/07 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100060032-3