TALKING POINTS FOR USIB ON COMPARATIVE EVALUATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86T00268R000800080047-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 21, 2013
Sequence Number: 
47
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 4, 1959
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86T00268R000800080047-7.pdf56.06 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP86T00268R000800080047-7 4 may 1959 1.27;*ORANDUM FOR: DDCI SUBJECT : Talking Points for USIB on Comparative Evaluation I suggest that in "consulting with" USIB on arrangements for the next comparative evaluation you make the following points: a. Admiral taskley's presentation of the coimparison on ASW and submarines was very favorably received. b. The third comparison is on computer technology and is now under way by a special panel of prominent scientists and industry people set up by Dr. Killian's office. It is chaired by Dr. EManuel Fiore of IBU. Since this comparison is being done by an outside group neither General Twining nor DCI had to appoint a senior man to do it. CIA has designated a liaison man to provide whatever intelligence is available. Other USIB agencies should be prepared to help out on request. C. The President approved last Thursday Long-Range Ballistic Missile Systems (ICW,IR140 POLARIS-type) as the next topic. The Director proposes to assign General Barnes (who handled the intelligence side of the first comparison) as his senior representative. Since WAIC will provide most of the technical data, would like Colonel McFarland to serve as assistant to Barnes. Also 'would like Colonel white of CIA/OSI to act as assistant to General Barnes. d. The job of providing the intelligence portion of long range missile collparison will not be difficult since GUAIC is up to minute on this and preparing contribu- tion to NIE 11-5-590 from which necessary estimates can be drawn off. Since these evaluations are comparisons of the situation as it exists today, we will not have to get into fuzzy future estimates. R. 17. KUM Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/08/21 : CIA-RDP86T00268R000800080047-7