LAW OF SEA COUNTRY STUDY NIGERIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
37
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 1, 1999
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 1, 1975
Content Type: 
STUDY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8.pdf1.85 MB
Body: 
r Release 1.998/09126 '" i, CIA-RDP86TOOf~08R000600110007-$' ? 0 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Con kI No Foreign !)L sem Law of the Sea Country Study Nigeria GCR LOS 75-10 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to Criminal Sanctions Classified by OW441 Exempt from General D.clas.ificail?n Schedule of E.O. 11632, exemption cal.poryl ?3B(1. (2), and (3) Automaticallyy d.claul/l.d ont date Impose ble to determine 0 ? ? Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL No Pon"Ign /N.VS(rn- The Law of the Sea Country Studies are prepared to support the NSC Interagency Task Force on the Law of the Sea. The countries to be included in the series are selected on the basis of priorities suggested by the chairman of the Task Force. Each study has two parts. Part I is an analysis of the primary geographic, economic, and political factors that might infli:ence the country's law of the sea policy, the public and private expressions of that policy, and a brief biography of the key personalities involved. Part II provides basic data and information bearing on law of the sea matters. This study was prepared by the office of Geographic and Cartographic Research. Biographic support was provided by the Central Reference Service. The study was coordinated within the Directorate of Intelligence and with the Depart- ment of State. Comments and questions may be directed to the LOS Country Studies Working Group, Code 143, Extension 2257. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL No l"or-rhn I)Imcn- ? CONTENTS Part I - Law of the Sea Analysis Summary .............. . ........................ 1 Factors Influencing LOS Policy ............ 2 Law of the Sea Policy ..... ................ 4 Key Policy Makers, LOS~Negotiators~and~Advisers 9 Biographic Sketches ....................................... 13 Part II - Background Information Basic Data ............................................ 19 Conventions . ... ................ ....... 20 Membership in Organizations Related to LOS Interests 21 Present Ocean Claims .... 22 Action on Significant UN Resolutions ...................... 23 ANNEX UN LOS draft articles submitted by Nigeria Maps: Regional map Theoretical Division of the World Seabed CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL No l'nrrl;.;n !)i, ,tic-u 0 NIGERIA Part I -- Law of the Sea Analysis A. SUMMARY (U) In the law of the sea (LOS) forum, Nigeria is a leading moderate in the lesser-developed-country (LDC) group. Its main concern at the LOS conference is to secure exclusive jurisdiction over the resources in a broad area adjacent to its coast. Nigeria supports establishment of the exclusive coastal economic zone up to 200 miles* in breadth in which the coastal state would have sole authority to: -- dispose of the resources, -- protect the marine environment, -- enforce customs, immigration, and sanitary regulations, and -- grant permission to conduct scientific research and construct and operate offshore installations. Nigeria would permit freedom of navigation and overflight in the coastal zone beyond the territorial sea. If establishment of the exclusive coastal economic zone is sanctioned Nigeria will support a 12-mile territorial sea that incorporates a precisely defined innocent passage regime. On the straits transit issue, Nigeria has called for a balance between the interests of maritime states and straits states. On the exploitation of the deep seabed, the Nigerian delegation has pointed out the need to make conditions attractive for private investment and will accept joint ventures and parallel licensing. * Distances and areas throughout this study are in nautical miles unless specified otherwise. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL Nigeria would guarantee landlocked and geographically disddvantaged states access to the iea and the living resources of the coastal zones of neighboring .oastal states, and a share in. the resources of the deep seabed. Nigeria supports compulsory dispute settlement, with the International Court of Justice as the primary tribunal in cases that cannot be settled by alternative peaceful means. The Nigerian delegation has given qualified approval to the archipelago concept espoused by archipelago states. On the issue of technology transfer, the delegation has asked for establishment of regional research and training centers, on-the-job training for LDC personnel, and the convening of marine science and technology conferences and seminars. B. FACTORS INFLUENCING LOS POLIL.Y Special Geographic Features (U) Nigeria's location at the apex of the Gulf of Guinea will give rise to some very taxing problems when that country and its coastal neighbors, i.e., Cameroon, Dahomey, Equatorial Guinea (Fernando Poo), and Portugal (Principe and Sao Tome), come to delimit their mutual sea boundaries. Equidistant lines extended seaward from the ends of the Nigerian coast rapidly converge and intersect slightly more than 200 miles to sea, severely truncating Nigeria's slice of the west African continental margin. The situations of Cameroon and Dahomey are even worse. Uses of the Sea (U) Mineral Resources -- The Niger Delta and the Nigerian continental shelf contain immense petroleum reserves. Since the end of 1973, Nigeria has produced more petroleum than any other country in Africa; 1974 prod'iction averaged 2.3 million barrels a day, and Nigeria now ranks seventh among the world's producers. Petroleum is Nigeria's chief export and contributes more, by far, to the country's gross domestic product (GDP) than any other commodity. Living Resources -- Nigeria is the largest consumer of fish and fish products in Africa, yet its own fishing industry contributes less than 5 percent of the country's GDP. The fishing fleet, which consists of canoes and coastal trawlers and shrimp boats, is supplemented by foreign ships chartered by the Nigerian Government for distant-water fishing. ? CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26.: CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 c NFIDENTIAL S Nigeria's inland and coastal waters are not rich enough to satisfy the country's growing demand 'for fish, thus dist.ant- water fisheries will have to take up the slack if the country intends to decrease its fish imports. Marine Transportation -- The national merchant fleet., almost entirely government owned, carries only a small portion of Nigeria's international trade. The ships operate on routes between Nigeria and the major ports of west Africa and western Europe. Naval and Air Transportation Considerations -- Although small, the Nigerian Navy is the largest naval force in west Africa, but it suffers rrom poor maintenance and spare parts shortages. The navy's mission is primarily coastal defense. Nigerian Airways, Ltd., the government-owned national flag carrier flies to 12 countries in west Africa, Europe, and the Middle East and, in association with Pan American Airways, to New York City. ? Political and Other Factors (U) Nigeria has been less caught up in the emotionalism of the "common heritage of mankind" than some other LDCs. While the Nigerians support the general LDC positions on LOS issues, they view them pragmatically and often provide the voice of reason. They are among the influential LDC moderates. The Federal Military Government has ruled Nigeria by decree since it seized power in a coup in 1966. General Yakubu Gowon, its Head, while basically pro-West and suspicious of Communist motives, is attempting to keep his country in the nonaligned camp. Lagos deals with the United States and the U.S.S.R. on an issue-oriented basis, almost devoid of ideology. Nigeria's closest international ties are with the United Kingdom. Relations with the United States have improved since the 1967-70 civil war, when the pro-rebel sympathies of some U.S. private organizations and Washington's neutrality offended the Nigerian G,)vernment. The United States is Nigeria's largest market for crude oil exports and its third most important source of import:. U.S. investment approaches $1 billion, or almost 50 percent- of our investment in Black Africa. ? CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/02//IbEgl~AERDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Nigeria strongly supports African nationalism and is a leader in the Organization of African Unity. While believing it inevitably will play a major leadership role in Africa, Nigeria ha, root flaunted its wealth, size, or military might for fear of intimidating its neighbors. C. LAW OF THE SEA POLICY Territorial Sea (C) The Federal Military Government extended the breadth of Nigeria's territorial waters from 3 to 12 miles in 1967 and then to 30 miles in 1971. At Caracas in 1974, the Nigerian delegation tabled its articles (see Annex) that would allow a state to declare territorial waters up to a breadth of 50 miles. Just before Caracas; however, a Nigerian LOS official 'indicated to the visiting U.S. LOS team that Nigeria would accept the 12-mile territorial sea, in conjunction with a 200-mile exclusive coastal economic zone, if this was the consensus of the Conference. Nigeria's primary LOS concern is to secure exclusive jurisdiction over its coastal resources, the rationale for the successive extensions of its territorial sea. The repeated violation of Nigerian territorial waters by the foreign ships and aircraft that provided arms and humanitarian relief to the rebels during the civil war has shaped in large measure the government's view on transit in the territorial sea. The Nigerian delegation has called for a precisely defined innocent passage regime in the territorial sea that: -- distinguishes between merchant ships and warships, -- requires prior permission for overflight, and -- sets forth explicit pollution control and safety regulations. Straits (C) Nigerian officials have admitted that the issue of navigation in international straits that are overlapped by territorial seas is not of vital concern tc their government. They understand, however, that the issue is of considerable concern to others and have indicated a willingness to mediate a compromise between the interests of maritime states and straits states. The Nigerian delegation's successes so far remain obscure. Nigeria is well aware that much of the opposition to free and unimpeded 0 IV ? CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL transit is based on political and ideological considerations, but sees fear of submerged transit and nuclear accidents as the basic reasons behind some of the opposition. Islands and Artificial Islands (U) The Nigerian delegation, during its opening remarks at Caracas in 1974, listed the regime of islands as an issue that the Conference should resolve. It has said nothing definitive on islands since then, however. The regime of artificial islands, on the other hand, is more germane to the country's interests in view of the extensive petroleum production and exploration activity off its coast. At Caracas, Nigeria introduced draft articles on the coastal economic zone (see Annex) that call for coastal state jurisdiction over the construction and operation of artificial islands in the economic zone, limited only by consideration for international navigation. Archipelagos (U) Like the regimes of islands and transit in international straits, the regime of archipelagos is of little concern to Nigeria. The Nigerian delegation has done nothing more than offer support for the general archipelago t. 'ory, i.e., con- struction of baselines around the archip'elag,, international navigation in designated lanes within tho archipelago, etc. It has, however, cautioned the archipelago states to be precise in their definition of transit through the archipelago. Delimitation and Demarcation (U) The Nigerian delegation is well aware of the consequences that its country's location in the Gulf of Guinea will have on delimitation of marine jurisdiction and has called for use of equitable ather than equidistant principles in the delimitation of international sea boundaries,. Unless it is truly interested in the welfare of its country's coastal neighbors, however, the delegation might do better to espouse the equidistance principle, which would allot Nigeria the larger portion of the sea.. Contiguous Zone (U) Nigeria wants the traditional contiguous zone jurisdictions over customs, fiscal matters, and immigration and sanitary regulations extended to cover the entire coastal economic zone. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL Coastal State Jurisdiction Beyond the Territorial Sea (U) The draft articles on the economic zone that the Nigerian delegation introduced at Caracas give the coastal state exclusive jurisdiction over the resources, pollution control measures, and scientific research activities in a zone adjacent to its coast up to 200 miles in breadth. Freedom of navigation and overflight and the laying of submarine cables and pipelines by other states would prevail in the zone beyond the territorial sea. Nigeria opposes national jurisdiction over the resources of the continental margin beyond the economic zone, seeing such as benefiting mainly the developed countries, many of which have extensive margins. Fisheries (U) Nigeria demands coastal state exclusivity over all facets of fishing in the coastal zone. In the event that it does not fully utilize the fish stocks in its economic zone, Nigeria would allow other states to take fish in the zone up to the maximum sustainable yield, but only through official agreement with the government in Lagos. The fishing of highly migratory species outside the coastal economic zone, Nigeria feels, should be governed by an international agency. Deep Seabed (U) The Nigerian Government has struck some very profitable bargains with the foreign oil companies that work its rich petroleum reserves and, in the process, has acquired an understanding of the operation and requirements of such companies. At the same time, Nigeria appreciates the feelings of fear and mistrust that many of its fellow LDCs have for these companies and their national governments regarding the exploitation of the deep seabed. In another move to strike a balance between diverse interests, the Nigerian delegations at both Caracas and Geneva, while supporting international control of seabed mining, urged that both private and state firms play a role. At Caracas the delegation said that when the seabed is first opened for exploitation, conditions of exploitation must be attractive for private investment and proposed that private and state firms be licensed as the sole operators, subject to fees and other payments to the International Seabed Resource Authority (ISRA). Later, when the ISRA has accumulated sufficient capital and technology to conduct mining operations on its own, these firms would be phased out in favor of the Enterprise System, ? ? ? CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL where the ISRA would be the sole operator. The delegation suggested that during the private/state firm phase, the ISRA should have a seat on the boards to verify income, profits, and costs. At Geneva, the Nigerians tilted slightly further in favor of private and state firm participation by emphasizing their support for joint ventures and giving positive consideration to parallel licensing. Joint ventures or parallel licensing would assure a permanent place for private and state firms in the exploitation of the deep seabed. The latter, however, allows for greater private/state participation by reserving specified areas of the seabed for private/state exploitation and other areas for ISRA exploitation. Nigeria wants the ISRA to control seabed production so as to maintain a stable world minerals market, with neither artifi- cially high nor artificially low prices. ISRA control of production also would, Nigeria hopes, eliminate the specter of unemployment ir, the land-based mining industry should seabed mining prove more profitable. The Nigerian delegation subscribes to the general LDC position that the one-nation-one-vote Assembly be the Authority's most powerful organ and that the Council be constituted on the basis of equal geographic representation. Nigeria opposes weighted voting and use of the veto. Landlocked and Geographically Disadvantaged States (U) Draft articles on the coastal economic zone that Nigeria introduced at Caracas in 1974 award to landlocked and geograph- ically disadvantaged states -- as well as to all other states -- the right to fish in the exclusive economic zones of coastal states, provided suitable bilateral or regional agreements with the coastal state have been negotiated. Statements of the Nigerian delegation in Second Committee proceedings, however, offer preferential rights to landlocked and geographically disadvantaged states that are not apparent in the draft. Nigeria would guarantee them free transit through neighboring coastal states and access to coastal state marine fisheries -- on a reciprocal basis. The "reciprocal" condition obviously can refer in this situation only to transit. Presumably, rigeria would deny these states access to the nonliving resources of the coastal seabed on the basis of reciprocity since coastal state rights to the nonliving resources in neighboring landlocked and geographically disadvantaged states has not been discussed in the LOS context. These states would have to rely upon the deep seabed for revenues from marine minerals. CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL Marine Pollution (U) Nigeria believes that the coastal state must have exclusive control of the regulation and preservation of the marine environment in the coastal economic zone. Pollution control standards, however, would be based on international and regional standards. Nigeria supports the work of the Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO) and urges that the regulations for prevention of pollution in the various IMCO conventions be incorporated into the LOS treaty. The 1973 Convention for the Prevention of Pollution by Ships stipulates joint flag state/ coastal state enforcement, which may be Nigeria's preference on the enforcement issue. Scientific Research (U) Nigeria endorses the Group of 77 position favoring the consent regime for scientific research in the coastal zone. Nigeria emphasizes, however, that the coastal state should normally give consent if the researcher demonstrates that the research is for peaceful purposes and allows coastal state participation, trains coastal state nationals in research techniques, and provides the coastal state with the resulting data and analyses. Transfer of Technology (U) In 1974 at Caracas, Nigeria sponsored one set of draft articles on technology transfer and cosponsored another (see Annex). The articles call for what amounts to the "spoon feeding" of LDCs with the full course of marine science end technology. Transfer would be accomplished on a state-to-state basis during the prosecution of a bilateral agreement to explore and/or exploit the coastal zone, via the proposed IS RA during the exploration and exploitation of the deep seabed, or under the auspices of other international organs through seminars, conferences, and the establishment of regional research and training centers. Settlement of Disputes (U) Nigeria supports compulsory settlement of disputes with mediation and other nonjuridical peaceful means as the primary vehicles. Nigeria feels that the International Court of Justice should be the primary tribunal for marine disputes that cannot be settled otherwise, with, perhaps, special tribunals for technical issues such as fishing also playing a role. 10 Approved For Release 1999/0MV"Dt'I*P PDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL ? D. KEY POLICY MAKERS, LOS NEGOTIATORS AND ADVISERS (U) The delegation to Geneva was again led by N.B. Graham-Douglas, Federal Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice. Nigerian LOS delegations have been composed of veteran LOS negotiators. However, decisions made by the negotiators are subject to review and approval of General Gowon and the Supreme Military Council. A list of Nigeria's LOS delegations, with biographic data on some individuals, follows: S CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONVIDLIJJIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Seabed Comtnittce Senttlon LOS Conrircnce Attendeen (U) . I eG Jul Mar Jul Jul r Aug Mnr Aug Apr Aug 1ltt .1 71. 72 72 73 73 7 i-tr. A.A. ADEDERAN Solicitor-General Ministry of Justice Mr. T.A. ADEMAKINWA Acting Principnl State Count;ei *Mr. Oiuycntt ADENIJI Director Intcrnationn]. Organizations Dcpnrt the n t Ministry of External Affairs Mr. T.I. AT)ESALU Federal Ministry of Justice Lagos *~1.r M.O. ADIO Senior State Counsel Ministry or Justice Miss C.M. AGUTA Mr. 0. ALO Head, Economic Division Ministry of External Affairs Mr. B.O. AWOKOYA Charm d'Affaires a.i. Embassy of Nigeria Berne Dr. A. AWOPETU First Secretary Permanent Mission to the UN Third L05 Confrr-ence Jun- Mar- Dec Aug Mny 73 74 75 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X i X * See following pages for biographic sketch. Approved For Release 1999/QR&,)E,gi k-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 0 LOS Cnmforonce Alt(Indoen (U) *1:.0. !SAYA(;ISONA Director Federal t?inherien Uepartrncnt (Now tit, official. of UN Food rsnd Agriculture Urganiyal:ion ) *il.I:? Dr. N.B. GitANAr1-iMIGI.A:; Attorney-General of the Federa- Lion and Comminnioner of lursticr_ I.L. Corrunandor M. A.ii. Llogbodo Nigerian Navy Al r . N.0. NA DAY (i; i I Deputy Director Federal Pinhorion Service. Lagoa 'third Seabed Coninittoo Somni(10 i/);; ("onferctic, c Jul rob .ittl_ Mar .Inl { June;tar- Mar Aug iIn r Aug Apr Aug i oc Aug , May 71 71 1 72 72 73 73 73 74 75 I ! ' I X Mr. I. J t! ti:'CA Minintor Permancnt Mission to the UN Mr. 0. LOi.OMARI Federal Ministry of Mines and Powe r Lagos *Mr, J.D. OGUNI)tiiti; Acting Solicitor General of the Federation Dr. L.E. OKOGWU First Secretary Permanent Mission to the UN Mr. S.O. OK1NRIBID0 Federal Director of Public Prosecutions Mr. J.N. OLISA State Counsel * Sec following pages for biographic sketch. ? CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONrIt)trdtIAL ? Seabed Commit-Lee 3eanton Thir ti ; t;ottfer d etire - -- _:Tul_ ' Feii Jul inr - .1tnt-, Mar M ar Aug I ttnr Aug Apr Aug t)ac Au,t !Mny 71 71 72 72 73 73 73 74 17 'tr. 0. 01.9)TO:O 1 11 ; Senior State !ounnel Federal Mintatrv of .JtutLice Lngon Mr. H.A. 51It'1"t'A-1117Y Legn1 Advt.ner Federnl 'tintntry of Juntice Mr. J.G. TO11O11, x x x x x Director Federal `tinintry of Agrtrulture and natural 1:enourcen Hr. Ab rahat* TU IJRU Ministry of i:xternnl Affntrn ? 0 CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 25X6 Next 5 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONHDtNTIAI ? Nigeria Pnrt It - Background Information* Geography ? World region: Africa Category: coastal Bordering states: Dahomey, Niger, Chad, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea (Fernando Poo), Tortuga]. (Principe and Sao Tome) Bordering bodices of water: Atlantic Ocean (Gulf of Guinea) Area of continental shelf: 12,500 sq. mt. Area to 200 mi. limit: 61,500 sq. mi. Area to edge of continental margin: 37,100 nq. mi. Conutline: 530 statute mi. Land: 357,000 sq. statute tai. Population: 63,022,000 Industry and Trade GDP: $22.6 billion (FY75 current prices), $360 per capita Major industries; mining -- crude oil, natural gas, coal, tin, columbite- processing industries -- oil palm, peanut, cotton, rubber, petrclcum, wood, hides, skins; manufacturing industries -- textiles, cement, building materials, food products, footwear, chemical, printing, ceramics Exports: $9.3 billion (f.o.b., 1974), oil (92%), peanuts, palm products, cocoa, rubber, cotton, timber, tin Imports: $2.8 billion (c.i.f., 1974;, machinery and transport equipment, manufactured goods, chemicals Major trade partners: U.K., EC, U.S. Merchant marine: 18 ships (1,000 GRT or over) totaling .,09,400 GRT; includes 1.7 cargo, 1 bulk (C) Marine Fisheries Catch: 156,000 metric tons (1970); imports -- $3.7 million (1971 Economic importance: nationally as an important source of animal protein; locally provides employment as well as source of animal protein Nature: primarily coastal, limited distant-water * WARNING -- Unless otherwise indicated, individual items are Unclassified For Official Use Only. Classification designation is (C) Confidential. ? - 19 - CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONr'IDEN1IAL Specien: bongo, tuna Nature of marine limited modern sardinella, croaker, threndfin, grunt, shrimp, fisheries techniques: primarily artisnnal, Other countries fishing off coast: U.S.S.R., Cuba, Eastern European Extent of foreign offshore fishing: vessels U.S., Japan, France, Spain, countries limited, by chartered foreign Petroleum Resources Petroleum: production -- 482.5 million 42-gal, bbl. (65.1 million metric tons) onshore, 182.7 million 42-gal. bbl. (24.7 million metric tons) offshore; proved recoverable reserves -- 9,200 million 42-gal bbl. (1,243 million metric tons) onshore, 3,400 million 42-gal. bbl. (459 million metric tons) offshore (1972) Natural gas: production -- 438.7 billion cubic feet (12.4 billion cubic meters) onshore, 165.9 billion cubic feet (4.7 billion cubic meters) offshore; proved recoverable reserves -- 30,000 billion cubic feet (840 billion cubic meters) estimated onshore, 10,000 billion cubic feet (280 billion cubic meters) estimated offshore (1972) Navy Ships: 1 destroyer escort, 6 patrol, 5 motor gunboats, 1 mine warfare, 1 amphibious warfare, 4 auxiliary and service craft (C) Government Leaders Head of Federal Military Government and Commander in Chief of Nigerian Armed Forces, General Yakubu Cowen Commissioner for External Affairs, Okoi Arikpo Multilateral Conventions Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, 1958. Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, 1958. Geneva Convention on the High Seas, 1958. Geneva Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas, 1958. (IMC) International Convention for the Prever.cion of Pollution of the Sea by Oil, 1954 (IMCO) International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1960. (IMCO) Regulations for the Prevention of Collisions of Vessels at Sea, 1960. - 20 - CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 C ARf 86T00608R000600110007-8 Multilateral Conventions (cont'd) (IMCO) Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic, 1965. (IMCO) International Convention on Load Lines, 1966. Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, 1963. UN Convention on transit Trade of Land Locked States, 1965. Multilateral Declarations Lusaka (Non-Aligned) Declaration. Membcrshin in Oi:S_g nations Related to LOS Interests AFDB ........................ Commonwealth ECn ... ...............,..... FAO ............... .... IAEA .......................... IBRD .......................... ICAO .......................... ILO ................ IMCO .......................... IMF ........................... ITU ........................... Lake Chad Basin Commission Niger River Commission OAU ........................... OPEC .......................... Seabeds Committee ............. UN .................... UNESCO ........................ UPU ................. WHO ........................... African Development Bank Economic Commission for Africa Food and Agriculture Organization International Atomic Energy Agency International Bank for Reconstruc- tion and Development (World Bank) International Civil Aviation Organization International Labor Organization Inter-Governmental Maritime Con- sultative Organization International Monetary Fund International Telecommunications Union Organization of African Unity Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of the Seabed and Ocean Floor beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction United Nations United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization Universal Postal Union World Health Organization - 21 - CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL ? Present Ocean Claims* Type Date Terms Source, Notes Territorial 1964 3 iii. Interpretation Act of 1964, No. 1 St a 1967 1.2 mi. Decree. No. 5 of Mar. 8, 1967 1971 30 mi. Party to Convention on Territorial Sea (June 26, 1961) Territorial Waters (Amendment) Decree 1971 No. 38, Aug. 26, 1971 Supplement to Official Gazette No. 44, Vol. 58, Sept. 2, 1971. Continental 1959 Adopted shelf Part A Mineral Oil (Amendment) Dec. .17, Shelf concept in 1.959 Proclamation but no precise definition Decree No. 51 ? Petroleum Decree 1969 Official Gazette, Nov. 27, 1969, 200 meters or further. Party to the Convention on the Continental Shelf (May 28, 1971) Exclusive 1971 12 mi. Decree No. 30, June 10, 1971 Fishing Refers only to motor fishing boats Require license for domestic or foreign ships 1971 30 mi. Decree No. 38 See Fisheries Regulations 1972, Official Gazette No. 39 Aug. 24, 1972, Supp. Customs 1971 30 mi. Decree No. 38 Security 1971 30 mi. Decree No. 38 Civil Jurisdiction 1971 30 mi. Decree No. 38 * Principal source: Limits of the Seas, National Claims to Maritime Jurisdiction, 2d Revision, State Dept./INR, April 1974. - 22 - CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 CONFIDENTIAL ? Action on Significant UN Resolutions Moratorium Resolution Abstain (A/RES/2574 D, XXIV, 12/15/69) Pending establishment of international zuyimo, States and persons are bound to refrain from exploiting resources of or laying claim to any part of the seabed and ocean floor beyond the 1imi is of national jurisdiction. LOS Conference Co-sponsor (A/RES/2750 C, XXV, 12/17/70) Convene in 1973 a Conference on Law of i:he Sea to deal with establishment of international regime for the seabed and ocean floor, and onlargc Seabed Committee by 44 members and instruct it to prepare for the conference draft treaty articles embodying international regime. LOS Conference, Timing and Site Co-sponsor (A/RES/3029 A, XXVII, 12/18/72) Indian Ocean as a Zone of Peace In favor (A/RES/2992, XXVII, 12/15/72) Called upon littoral and hinterland states of Indian Ocean area, permanent members of the Security Council and other major maritime users of Indian Ocean to support concept that Indian Ocean should be zone of peace. Landlocked/Shelf-Locked Study Resolution In favor (A/RES/3029 B, XXVII, 12/18/72) Called for study of extent and economic signifi- cance in terms of resources, of international area resulting from each proposal of limits of national jurisdiction presented to Seabed Committee. Peruvian Coastal State Study Resolution In favor (A/RES/3029 C, XXVII, 12/18/72) Called for study of potential economic signifi- cance for riparian states, in terms of resources, of each of the proposals on limits of national jurisdiction presented to Seabed Committee. Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources In favor (A/RES/3016 XXVII, 12/18/72) Reaffirmed right of states to permanent sovereignty over all their natural resources, wherever found. ? - 23 - CONFIDENTIAL Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86TOO608ROO0600110007-8 ? UUNITF0 NATIONS THIRD CONFERENCE ON THE LAW OF THE SEA Distr. LIMITED A/CONF.62/C.2/L.12 17 July 1974 Article 1 (General Provisions: Nature and Characteristics) 0 l,rticle 2 Limits of the Territorial Bea The territorial sea shell not extend beyond 50 nautical miles from the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured. ? Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86TOO608ROO0600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 UNITED NATIONS THIRD CONFERENCE ON THE LAW OF THE SEA Uistr, LIMIM A/COtW.G2/C,2/L.21/Nnv,: 5 Aul;unt 1974 Nigoria: draft articles on the oxclunive economic Zone THE RIGHTS AND C014PETENCES OF A COASTAL STATE 1. A conutal State has the right to establish beyond its territorial sea, an exclusive economic zone the outer limit of which shall not exceed 200 nautical miles measured from the applicable banclineo for measuring the territorial sea. 2. A coastal State has the following rights and compotonces in its exclusive economic zone: (a) exclusive right to explore and exploit the renewable living resources of the uca and the sea-bed, (b) sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting the non-renewable resources of the continental shelf, thn sea-bed and the subsoil thereof; (c) exclusive right fcr the management, protection and conservation of the living resources of the sea and sea-bed, taking into account the recommendations of the appropriate international or regional fisheries organizations; (d) exclusive jurisdiction for the purpose of control, regulation and preservation of the marine environment including pollution control and abatement; (e) exclusive jurisdiction for the purpose of control, authorization and regulation of scientific research; (f) exclusive jurisdiction for the purpose of protection, prevention and regulation of other matters ancillary to the rights and competencea aforesaid and, in particular, the prevention and punishment of infringements of its customs, f:acal, immigration or sanitary regulations within its territorial sea band economic zone. 3. A coastal State shall have the exclusive right to authorize and regulate in the exclusive economic zone, the continental shelf, ocean bed and subsoil thereof, the construction, emplacement, operation and use of off-shore artificial islands and other intallations for purposes of the exploration and exploitation of the non-renewable resources thereof. ? ? Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 A/COMp.62/c.2/b.21/Flev.1 ringli.h Page 2 0 ? Its A coastal State eugr entablish a reasonable area of safety totes around its off?shon artificial !.lands and other installations in vhich it say take appropriate ssasures to ensure the safety both of it@ installations and of navigation. fluab sate%y some shall be designed to edeure that they are reasonably related to the nature and fusetioss of the installations. is e P. 'rill; 21lOi Ti) AND COIQL'TVIC J OF OTIIEI% 9TAT23 1. All States shall have the foiloving rights in the ezelusivs seen -la tons of a coastzl Strtet (a) l~eedoe of navigation and overflight; and (b) freedom of laying of submarine cables and pipelines. 2. All States may exercise, subject to an appropriate bilateral or regional arrangement or agreement, the competence to exploit an agreed level of the living resources of the tone. 3. Land-locked and geographically disitvantaged fltatw shall have the right to explore and exploit the living resources of the exclusive economic zones of neighbouring coastal States, subject to appropriate bilateral or regional arrangements or agreements vith such coastal States. lcle THE DVPIES OF A COASTAL BTATR 1. A coastal State shall use its exclusive economic zone for peaceful purpw es only. 2. A coastal State, in its exclusive economic zone, shall entoroe applicable international otandardc regarding the oafety of navigation. 3. .1 coastal State, in its exclusive economic zone, is under an international duty not to interfere without rinoonable justification vith: (a) the freedom of navien-tion and overflight, and (b) the freedom of laying of submarine cables and pipelines. b. A coastal State shall not erect or establish artificial islands and other installations, including cafety tones around these, in such a manner as to interfere with the use by all Staten of recognized sealanes and traffic separation schemes essential to international navigation. Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 A/OW1t. 62/O.2tL.21/kv 1 i Page Amide 4 1. In the exclusive coonoaio tone of the eouta) Otate, all other Otates are duty bound not to interfere with the exeroies by the coastal Otate of its rigbts and eompetenee?. 2. In ouch an exclusive economic rune. C11 other Otates Mall ensure cmpliance by vessels of their flag with. (a) applicable international standards regarding the safety of navigation outsi4e safety tonce established by a coastal Otate around otf-shore artificial islands and other installations used for the exploration and exploitation of the non-renevable resources of the tonel and (b) the regulations of the coastal Otate regarding the safety of the said off-shore artificial islands and other installations an well u ancillary regulations of the coastal Otate regarding the enforcemnt or its custom, fiscal, isigration and sanitation laws. ? ? ? Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 UNITED NATIONS THIRD CONFERENCE ``- ON THEIAWOFTHESEA $IQERIA: DRAFT ARTXCI 8 Oil TU DBVRLOPKEI T MD R'AA S XR Ot TICEPOLOOY Article 1 1. To insure adequate and equitable?tranafer of technology in accordance with the concept of the common heritage of mankind in the ocean space, States vith the capacity for marine acientific research shall alvays and at all levels associate vith personnel of developing countries. Article 2 1. Regional Scientific Research Centres shall be established, as suborgaaso of ? the International Sea-Bed Authority, in the developing countries. 2. The functions of ouch Regional Scientific Research Centres shall include: (a) advanced training and education on all aspects of marine acientific research, particularly marine biology, oceanography, cartography, sea-bed mining, engineering and mineralogy; (b) advanced management studies; and (c) prompt publication of results of marine scientific research in readily available journals. Article 3 1. The International Sea-Bed Authority shall ensure that adequate provisions are made in its exploration and exploitation licences and contracts vith States and nationals of other States vhether natural or juridical, for enterprises granted exploration and exploitation rights under such licences and contracts, to take on as members of their staff under training, nationals of developing countries vhether coastal, land-locked or otherwise geographically disadvantaged. 2. The Internation..: Sea-Bed Authority shall make available to any country an request, blueprints and patents of plants and machinery used in the exploration and exploitation of the international area. ? Distr. LIHITED A/OONP.62/C.3/L.8 1 August 1974 ORIOIIAL: AnLten Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 n/couI,62/C.3/L.O fattish I, 11te International fen-fled Authority nhall obtain fr,)m any Rate to which ic.hno granted the riphtn of exploration and exploitation of the Pea-bed under licences or p'mtrnctn tin payment or reasonable fern or premiums, blueprints and patents or the plnntr and machinery uned by ouch Mateo or their nntionaln In the exploration and rx111i1tItion or the Pen-bed and ocean floor beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. 1I. 41ce International foa-Bed Authority shall ensure that adequate provisions are mr,rc' by it to facilitnte the acquisition by any developing State or Ito nationals of the n,rrnnnry nkilln and "know-how" in any undertaking by the Authority of enterprises f'or exploration and exploitation of the nea-bed and ocean floor beyond the limits of ,f,lnnnl jurindiction. Article 4 .1. All Jtnten are under a duty to co-operate actively with the Internntionn1 t; :a-1d Authority to facilitate the trannfor of skills in marino scientific research miI t'chnology to developing, Staten and their nationals. 0 ? Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 I TL- THIRD CO ZQENCE CN TUE LAIN OF THE SEA t-rnr.{a . F,c+~ndor~iyynt, irngj fix{cn, orh._c~_tt{ grin. ttr7nn, 1'nkint.nn r~i r~rlryCene,anl~ ontt n .,'ri Lnnkn 'Prin{(Ind nnfl Cab. n Tun tits Urupurly, Vrn~;u~ln na~t Yu-?orlnvir; ~trnft nrtirl~r~r on the dr_vn ""' - _ ---- - larnrnt. saga trnr,tifnr or tecl;nr,lr,~y Article 1 1. All Staten shall actively promote the development of the ncientific and trchl-+ulot;icnl capacity of developing Ctnt.r; with regard to the exploration, txpioitntion, c;,auorvntion and management of marin:? resources, the precervntion of the r.arinq environment and the le;;itimnte uses of ocean n pnce, with n view to ecceter'iting their ooriu.'L and economic development. 2. To this end, tut shhll, inter nliu", either directly or through npuro rate intcrnc+tionn1 orgnni;;ntionn: (!t) promote the acquisition, development and dissemination of marine scientific rule Leschnoiogical Iulow1cd';C; (b) facilitate the transfer of technology, including; know-how and putentcd and non-putentcd technology; (c) promote the development of human resources and the trninin;.; of personnel, (d) facilitate access to ncientific and technolopLicnl inforrltion and data.- (e) promote international co-operation at all levels, particularly at the r+egioual, cubregionai and bilateral levels. In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives and taking into account the eruats, special needs and conditions of developing States, Stater. ahrtll inter alin: (a) establish prograrsme5 of technical assistance for the effective transfer of ^.; I?ir:ds of marine technology to developing Stater.; (b) conclude agreements, contracts rand other similar arrnn-^ments, under. ;rn i~ab1c and reasonable conditions; (_) hold conferences, meetin,s and serainars on approp-'inte scientific and '~ .~ls~{ical subjects, _1628 h{ntr. 1,1 ?I{TI,t) A/Cbtip.62/C.3/L.12 12_ Auguat 1974 O1it;iltlAL: ; uoL1111 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 tatgi i::L ( 1) Itl(l.`)1,t' 1, tie "f.ChrIt.i;' r)f fitirnt.iI;t,; i t, i.II.1f1t'r;;l.^,(,6 aII'1 ( f i.IIRI. r?xp^1.1.n (r') tlhleYLnt;r, trojrctr, itict.n',iti ,Ir+inLWv^r,tu+'r p, rnixell rnril lr bi.inLrarrtl nrul nullit'iterni Cr~.ol,t,t?nt,it)n I. -All 11tnten Sire under it duty to co-npr?rt'Lr' nctivr'ly with tht' 'Authority" to enco+tra.uc ntrl fncilitnte the tranr:fsrr rlf r1.111 4q in tinrino nCientifit'. net.ivitien Sind reln',ei technology to developinr, ;tt,tt' rend their nntiunnin. Artiel n 'i'h- ' Authority" rhndi, within Itti competence. cttnur": (l) that ndequatr provinionc nre mndc in 1tn 1ern1 nrrnnFr.nr'ntn with ,juridical Wild; nat.urrtl pernonu engaged in marine ncir.nt.iric activities. thr exploration of thr' ital,ernnt.ionni Area, the rxploitntion or its renourccu Sind reintr'd net.ivitien to take on and-r training, nu rsenber+, of the mrnnt;crtn1, scientific Sind technical staff conutitutod for theno purponcn, nntionaln of developing ?lttttcn uhrther conntnl, lrtml-?lockod or otherwi:e Ceo;;raphically dirnclvnntaged. on nn equitable reogrnrt'{cal clic.;.ributton. (2) that all blueprint:: Sind !' tent.n of thr' equilirtent, machinery, devices Sind prnce::nr.u used in the exploration or the interpnt.ionttl Aren, the cxnloitr-tion of itn le;:ou:,^.cn slid related activitten le jade nvailablo to nil developing States upon reque:;t. (3) th..t adequate provisions arc nude by it to facilitate the acquisition by any d(?vclr_l:'_ng PtatT, or its nationals, of the ncccur.:-ry skills and know-how including profu:;,ional training in any undertaking by the Authority for exploration of the interr.ntional :lea. exploitation of its rcaourccn and relatel activities. (la) that a Special Fund is catablichcd to assist developing Staten in the r+ccttti ,ition of necessary equipment, Ilrocegaez;, plant and other technicul know-how .renuired for the exploration and exploitation of their marine renoureen. Article 4 T. 3tutcr. shall promote the establishment in developing States of regional marine ;Scientific and technological rcacnrch centres, in co-ordination with the Authority, in;.ernational organizations and national marine scientific and technological insti tutions. 2. 'ft'c functions of such Regional Scientific and Technological Research Centrea include, inter a1ia: (a) training and educational programmes at all leveln on various ispects of rjariu?_ :;cicnti fic and technological research, particularly marine biology, including t:un,?:rvicetion and management. of living resources, oceanography, hydrography, ,,rt;,:;t?_,^rin;;; geology, sea-bed mining and desalination technologies; ? ? Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 A/CO?t.G2/0.3/L.12 t;ngl i sh Page 3 (t,) mnnagertrnt ntudlen; (c) study progrtuvnis relates] to the preservation or the marine environment and the cnntrol of pollution; (d) organisation of regional c,!minarn, conferences and symposia-. (e) acquisition and proceening of marine neientifie and technological data and infornntion, in order to nerve ns regional data contras; Cr) prompt dissemination of results of marine scientific and technological research in readily available publications; (g) nerving an a repository of marine technologies for the States of the region covering both patented and non-patented technologies and know-how; and (h) technical acniotance to the countrien of the region. Approved For Release 1999/09/26 : CIA-RDP86T00608R000600110007-8 (LAY P I CQR N _- 5LA,`Dp)roved? or Re~As~se~ta1~9~9~09t26~e?I 0? A116 :,11,10T N[CUSAOILY. AUTN011t?ATIV[ AFRICA J (intemelor al Territory) - uwrorn0. OPIITOII /??~{,'lwn~, Johannesburg ,,,,,I O S AZIWND SOUTH lust S A AFRICA- ~? / "'~ ,4W0 SAW tub" (UK) l~n-ow.Y)~ e16s619"&,VjR6 : PA~~jtbk8~ 0608R00 O LA60s CAMEROON wl1 O,' O,m* /ofhAhrIU riNl ,I 10unt.+plAl~.;.~ ....,. hlnrgr~ ~i(IINtA J / (r.?1up,11) ?' ll.. tOm?1.. I1NmI(0 Cap* Tow ANGO~A (Portugal) SOIITH WEST 00 ilaN U 1 Orl 2000 f alhnnN 000 I;OO(A tool ? IIm conlln~fnfnl ?Arll r~ r i v trhr/hnlly Ilalifrnrl Iry Iha 7(X1 fnelaf (OCi8 fool) lar,trath ?? tha ConllnllnUl nwrp/n 14 appfoelmntaly dafinad by the A(XXA metnf (13122 loot) iiolrnth 706 Naf11anl ma.. ..i I BOTS\"/ANA VL'IIGANDA~ I 1AYU1 O 1,. AtAy It Ip(NDI I?: r: bait ZAMBIA /dun 1. Ar. IJ,mr,i/yhl( l~ 1 SOUTHERN R ODESIA .?\t ) ` ~pprov ? qq+or R lem-wORWO _r-~iltltl RthnrnR Otw 17.000 reel 9' Jr ~\ 111///I.l~b.ii KENYA ,,'Id) itE 0 NAII011 A M A~ (It) TAN7ANIA Kariba 1AIA4. SOUTHERN R ODESIA (IJK;~ BOTSWANA AUP.mb,, Island Una, lham.. 11~1'nhbAr IdAnd Q PAR ES SALAAM 1( "Marts Island ~~~ ' IFr) tLES BARREN u (Fr) ' Approv d or Re%vaW19@A/26 : C 1 _ Seabed loss than 200 motors (656 feet) deep Continental platform deeper than 200 motors! plateaus? THEORETICAL DIVISION or slopes steeper than 1:40 Continental rise, with slopes flatter than 1:40 and steeper than 1:1000 (outer edge approximates the seaward limit of the continental margin) Area beyond 200 nautical --I mile seabed jurisdiction - Equidistant division of the seabed (to 200 nm or edge I'COI'Lfl5 R[I'UI)LIC OF (:I IIIUA