REWARD FOR AGENCY EMPLOYEES AND AGENCY CONTRACTORS' EMPLOYEES PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ESPIONAGE ACTIVITIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
32
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 18, 2010
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 9, 1985
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1.pdf775.24 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 9 AUG 13b5 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security Policy and Plans Group SUBJECT: Reward for Agency Employees and Agency Contractors' Employees Providing Information on Espionage Activities 1. As requested, attached are two proposed versions of a recommendation regarding Subject to be forwarded to the DCI. Staff research has come up with the following considerations: Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Iq Next 10 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE Security Committee SECOM-A-277 10 July 1985 AGENDA Two Hundred and Eighty-sixth Meeting Wednesday, 24 July 1985, 10:00 AM Room 7D32, CIA Headquarters Preliminary Comments (e.g. budget, proposed NSDD on overseas security, Chairman's brief of SSCI Staffers) ITEM 1 Approval of Minutes of 26 June 1985 meeting ITEM 2 Discussion and Approval of revised Par. 11, DCID 1/14 ITEM 3 Discussion of assignment of responsibilities and accreditations regarding SCIFs ITEM 4 SECOM Staffing ITEM 5 New Business ITEM 6 Next Meeting (10:00 a.m., Wednesday, 21 August 1985, Room 7D32 CIA Headquarters CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 PRELIMI&ARY COMMENTS SECOM Budget proposals have had some recent activity with the IC Staff. SECOM has been asked to resubmit those proposals after the first group of proposals was turned down by the IC Staff last Monday. After SECOM conversations with the IC Staff, it became apparent that although the SECOM submissions were made on 10 April to the IC Staff, the submissions had somehow "fallen through the cracks." C/SECOM will give a progress report at this meeting. STAT The proposed NDSS on overseas security is being coordinated this date (17 July) with member The final DDA version is being hand carried by for review and comment. C/SECOM will comment on the status. Chairman's brief of SSCI staffers will be a topic for preliminary commentary. ITEM 1 Approval of Minutes for 26 June 1985 meeting Action Taken regarding the Minutes - ? Harassments and Provocations study forwarded to appropriate offices for input. SECOM has granted us an extension of the deadline to 20 August since SAG asked for more time. ? DOE presentation on CULTS notice was forwarded to PSI components and SEG. ? SAG notified of termination of Project Slammer. ITEM 2 Discussion and Approval of Paragraph 11, DCID 1/14. Agency response attached as TAB A. We suggested the addition of the words "prior to" to paragraph one of the document rather than "immediately following," as it refers to the time element for reporting such outside activities. We also suggested highlighting of the prepublication review provision. Concurred with the rest of the addition. ITEM 3 Discussion of assignment of responsibilities and accreditations regarding SCIFs. STAT has brought this to the attention of the Computer Security Subcommittee. SECOM staff has not had sufficient time to research the topic and will suggest a working group be formed to conduct such research. Al Petit will ask for deferral of discussion of the topic until the Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 August meeting. I (forwarded a short memorandum to PPG (attached as TAB B) explaining the issue of assignment of responsibilities and accreditations regarding SCIFs. ITEM 4 SECOM Staffing - Discussion of a replacement for Bob Murray. STAT ITEM 5 New Business - has none for this session. STAT ITEM 6 Next Meeting Wed 21 August 1985. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Iq Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 CONFIDENTIAL ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) FRO DATE 15 August 1985 SEOCM: Harrassments and Provocations Study TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) C/POL BR C/PPG DD/P$M D/S FORM 61 O USE PREVIOUS 1-79 EDITIONS OFFICER'S I COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) CONFIDENTIAL Attached is a response to SEOCM regarding subject. SECOM extended the original deadline to 20 August to accommodate input from SAG and CI Staff. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 UUN r' 1 llr:1V'1' i4 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman, SECOM Director of Secure y SUBJECT: Harrassments and Provocations Study 1. This memorandum is in response to Chairman, SECOM's request to provide updated material to the SECOM Harrassments and Provocations Study. 2. The input forwarded has been obtained from the Office of Security, Security Analysis Group and from this Agency's Counterintelligence Staff. As requested, this material is in "raw" form. It is understood that the SECOM staff will use this material as basic and will prepare the final drafts in unclassified form which will be returned for review and comment prior to publication. :OS/P&M/PPG !Distribution:! Orig - Adse: 1 - D/S: OS Registry! - PPG Chrono: (15 August d5): CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 CONFIDENTIAL DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE Security Committee SECOM-D-176 25 June 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: SECOM Members FROM: SUBJECT: Chairman Update of SECOM Harassments and Provoccations Study 1. Attached is a first draft of an update of the June 1982 SECOM Study of Harassments and Provocations. Anecdotal accounts in the attachment are sanitized summaries of classified and unclassified material submitted by Community departments and agencies in the spring of 1984. Please advise if-* the draft may properly be published at the unclassified (For Official Use Only) level as was the case with the 1982 study. Issuance at that level makes the study broadly useful for defensive briefings of a wide range of personnel, including dependents. Pending member responses on the classification issue, the attachment is tentatively marked Confidential. 2. It would be desirable to include more current material in the updated study, particularly items reflecting current experience in the Soviet Union now that Chernenko has come and gone and the Soviets seem less interested in detente. It would be especially useful if material could be provided on the experiences of travelers and tourists visiting Communist countries as well as on assignees. Please provide any additional material that can be included in the study. 3. Responses on the classification issue and current material should be provided the SECOM staff by 23 July 1985. Attachment As Stated CONFIDENTIAL Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) SECOM: Harassments and Provocations Study FROM: NO. DATE 1 July 1985 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and ildi ) b DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom ng u RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) DD/PTAS SECOM is updating the June ts and t d f H 1982 y o arassmen s u 2. Provocations against. Americans assigned to, or traveling in, e d USSR E t E th , as ern urop an e 3 China. The "anecdotes" are C/OPS/PTAS intended to support official securit briefin s iv d f y g e e ens 4 for persons with access to classified information who are areas t th li t . ose o rave ng . 5. DD/PSI Attached, for your informa- f the i ti 6 s a copy o on, previous study of Harassments and Provocations, SECOM-D-222, 1982 d 24 J d t . une e a 7. C/OPS/PSI It is requested that DD/PTAS th e route the tasking to B appropriate Area Security Officers. 9. CI Staff Please provide updates to this study to PPG by COB, ednesday, 17 July 1985. 10. Questions may be di ctly to 11. 1 Attachment cc: C/EAB 1 C/SAG C/SEG 4. 15. FORM 610 USE DITI PREVIOUSONS I-79 CONFIDENTIAL 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Director of Central Intelligence A Study of Harassments and Provocations Prepared for The Director of Central Intelligence by the Security Committee For Official Use Only For Official Use Only SECOM-D-222 24 June 1982 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 For Official Use Only INTRODUCTION This study describes harassments and provocations against Ameri- cans assigned to or traveling in the USSR, Eastern Europe, and China. The cases cited illustrate procedures used by Communist country intelligence and security services and are intended to support official defensive security briefings for persons with authorized access to classified information who are traveling to those areas. ' iaterial in this study was contributed by US Government departments and agencies and describes incidents occurring in the 1978-81 period. For purposes this study: HARASSMENT means any action taken against a person or group to prevent, inhibit, or delay the achievement of personal or group objec- tives (e.g., impeding collection of information by assigned diplomats). PROVOCATION means any action taken against a person or group to induce self-damaging action (e.g., attempts to involve Americans in illegal activities). Attempts by hostile services to recruit Americans to commit espionage are outside the purview of this study, iii For Official Use Only Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Iq Next 11 Page(s) In Document Denied STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 ' JNGLA55 i r 1 PAGE 001 TOR: 150057Z MAY 85 PP RUEAIIB ZNR UUUUU ZOC STATE ZZH STU6007 PP RL)EHC DE RUFHNK #2072 1340736 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 140719Z MAY 85 FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5549 INFO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 5408 BT UtJCLAS HELSINKI 02072 E.O. 12356 N/A TAGS: CASC (SIPPLE, REGINA) SUBJECT: EXPULSION OF AMCIT FROM USSR 1.MS. REGINA SIPPLE, BORN OCTOBER 29, 1952 IN COLORADO, ISSUED SAN FRANCISCO MAY 20, 1983, CALLED AT EMBASSY ON MAY 13 TO REPORT THAT SHE HAD BEEN DENIED ENTRY TO THE SOVIET UNION. 2. MS. SIPPLE ARRIVED MOSCOW ON MAY 12 WITH HER TOUR GROUP. SHE SAYS THAT UPON SEARCHING HER LUGGAGE SOVIET CUSTOMS OFFICIALS DISCOVERED TAPED CHILDRENS'S MUSIC ACCOMPANYING SMALL BOOKLETS. THE BOOKLETS CONTAINED THE "SERMON ON THE MOUNT" PRINTED IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN ON FACING PAGES. SHE WAS ACCUSED OF ATTEMPTING TO SMUGGLE BANNED LITERATURE INTO THE USSR AND THE MATERIAL WAS CONFISCATED. 4. MS. SIPPLE HAS ASKED THAT HER PARENTS BE NOTIFIED THAT SHE IS WELL AND THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR CONCERN FOR 3. AFTER BEING DETAINED OVERNIGHT SHE WAS REQUIRED TO RETURN TO HELSINKI. SHE CAME DIRECTLY FROM AIRPORT TO EMBASSY. WE HAVE ARRANGED HOTEL ACCOMMODATION FOR HER AT THE RED CROSS (PUNAINEN RISTI) HOTEL, TEHTAANKATU 1, TELEPHONE 176811. SHE IS ATTEMPTING TO CHANGE AIRLINE TICKETS FOR RETURN TO U.S. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. UNCLASSIFIED STAT STAT STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Iq Next 13 Page(s) In Document Denied Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 SECRET ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) Update of SECOM'S Study of Harassments and Provocations FROM: EXTENSION NO. Chief, Security Anaylsis Group DATE 08 August 1985 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) 1. C/OPS/PSI is 2. C/PPG t o OA I'Ll COs O u 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. FORM 610 "EDITPREVI IONSUS 1-79 ECRET 5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 12 AUG S MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Policy and Plans Group ATTENTION: FROM: ie , Security Analysis p SUBJECT: Update of SECOM'S Study of Harassments and Provocations 1. Attached herewith are examples of harassments and provocations for inclusion in the SECOM Study of Harassments and Provocations. Recruitment attempts are not included as previous memoranda stated that recruitment attempts are outside the purview of the SECOM study. 2. Case 1 can be utilized in an unclassified version of the booklet. Case 2 was derived from information contained in a report of another U. S. Government Agerrcy and must ified at the secret level. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Unclassified CASE 1 During 1984/85 Soviet and Eastern Bloc media on a continuing basis published or broadcast information purporting to identify CIA officers. Some of their speculations are correct but many are not. One of the major thrusts of this activity is to simply harass the individual and embarrass the U. S. Government. Unclassified Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET FROM: SECOM: Harassments and Provocations Study -15NO_ TO: Officer designation, room number, and building) C/OPS/PSI 1 July 1985 SECOM is updating the June 1982 study of Harassments and Provocations against Americans assigned to, or traveling in, the USSR, Eastern Europe and China. The "anecdotes" are intended to support official defensive security briefings for persons with access to classified information who are traveling to those areas. JUL Attached, for your informa- tion, is a copy of the previous study of Harassments and Provocations, SECOM-D-222, dated 24 June 1982. It is requested that DD/PTAS route the tasking to the appropriate Area Security Officers. awl Please provide updates to this study to PPG by COB, Wednesday, 17 July 1985. cc: C/EAB ~-~/~ C/SAG `-~r-~ i / C/SEG 1-79 EDITIONS CONFIDENTIAL 25X1 25X1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Director of Central Intelligence A Study of Harassments and Provocations Prepared for The Director of Central Intelligence by the Security Committee For Official Use Only For Official Use Only SECOM-D-222 24 June 1982 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 For Official Use Only INTRODUCTION This study describes harassments and provocations against Ameri- cans assigned to or traveling in the USSR, Eastern Europe, and China. The cases cited illustrate procedures used by Communist country intelligence and security services and are intended to support official defensive security briefings for persons with authorized access to classified information who are traveling to those areas. Material in this study was contributed by US Government departments and agencies and describes incidents occurring in the 1978-81 period. For purposes this study: HARASSMENT means any action taken against a person or group to prevent, inhibit, or delay the achievement of personal or group objec- tives (e.g., impeding collection of information by assigned diplomats). PROVOCATION means any action taken against a person or group to induce self-damaging action (e.g., attempts to involve Americans in illegal activities). Attempts by hostile services to recruit Americans to commit espionage are outside the purview of this study. iii For Official Use Only Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Iq Next 7 Page(s) In Document Denied STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 For Official Use Only CONCLUSIONS Security officers of organizations whose personnel are authorized access to national security information should give them advance, defensive security briefings whenever they are to travel to Communist countries. Briefings should illustrate tactics and procedures used in harassments and provocations. The importance of immediate reporting to the nearest US diplomatic post of actual or suspected incidents should be emphasized. Those being briefed should be told that, while acknowledging embarrassing of foolish acts is not pleasant or easy, failure to report all incidents involving them exposes them to the prospect of even more serious follow-up action by hostile intelligence agencies without the opportunity for the US Government to protect them. Further, failure to report denies other Americans the informa- tion they should have to avoid problems during their own travel. Assurances should be given that US au- thorities will provide all possible assistance to help Americans who are the victims of reported harass- ments or provocations. The continued usefulness of studies such as this depends on receipt of information describing new harassments and provocations. Security officers using this publication are encouraged to con- tact persons from their organizations who are return- ing from travel to Communist countries to determine what they experienced or saw in the way of actual or apparent harassments or provocations. Pertinent infor- mation obtained through these contacts should be reported through appropriate channels to the security component of the Government department or agency with security cognizance over your organization. 11 For Official Use Only Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 11 - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 `~~?~C w9day, .I :. 1Y84 THE WASHINGTON POST `Harassment' in Leningrad Leads to U.S. Warning f or Tr avelers By John M. Goshko Washington Post$tatt Writer The State Department, citing "approximately a dozen cases` of r grant harassment" of Americans in Leningrad during the past `six months, yesterday issued a "travel advisory" warning U.S. citizens that they face danger of arrest and de- nial of access to U.S. officials if they visit that Soviet city. The advisory followed an incident Thursday in which a Marine guard assigned to the U.S. consulate there was beaten by Soviet police. Department spokesman . Alan gomberg also disclosed yesterday that an American professor was arrested by plainclothes police in Leningrad on July 28 and held for two hours without being allowed to contact the iconsulate. "Today's- advisot-,;gn Leningrad is the first to ca*tiol .America>ns traveling there that the U.S. gov- ernment cannot guarantee that the Soviet Union will adhere to provi- sions of the U.S.-U.S.S.R. consular convention, stipulating the right of access to consular officials in the event of arrest or detention," a de- partment statement said. Department officials said adviso- ries have been issued in the past about Soviet travel. But, they not- ed, the earlier advisories have in- volved possible problems in obtain- The officials said Leningrad was singled out because the majority of serious incidents pecurred there. Some cases, beginning with an at- tack on a U.S. consular official last April, have been publicized previ- ously, but yesterday's advisory in- dicated a widespread pattern of in- cidents involving private American travelers as well as U.S. officials. The officials said the frequency of incidents in the Leningrad area could not be ascribed solely to ten- sion between the Reagan adminis- tration and the Soviet government. They gave as one possible expla- nation the fact that the police and KGB officials in Leningrad have a reputation for being especially ing visas or hotel rooms in some parts of the Soviet Union. They also said that after a Ko- rean. Air Lines jetliner was shot down by a Soviet plane- last Septem- ber, an advisory warned` that trav- elers in the Soviet Union might have trouble obtaining plane tick- ets. Leningrad rivals Moscow as the principal center for foreign tourists in the Soviet Union, and the advi- sory reflected what U.S. officials said was a desire to protect Amer- icans from possiblg danger, and to emphasize to the Soviet govern- ment U.S. concern about "unsatis- factory Soviet, resonse' in dealing with the situation.:.. tough in dealing with suspected breaches of state security. "There have- been several cases of unlawful detention.of tourists by the Soviet security?Orghns following innocent contacts with Soviet cit- izens,". the advisory sajtl. "During detention, Americans,. have been denied. their rights;: under the U.S.- U.S.S.R. consular,, convention, to communicate with an American consular officer and to be visited by him without delay. American tour- ists have been subjected to arbi- trary and in many cases unjustifi- ably embarrassing searches of their personal effects .... " In describing the July 28 incident, Romberg said an American profes- sor, whom he would not identify, was arrested on the way to a meet- ing with a Soviet scholar who spe- cializes in 18th century literature and was held at a police station for two hours. Romberg said the pro- fessor was told "that a new Soviet law which took effect on July 1 did not require that foreigners be granted access to their consular representatives unless they were being deported." Other incidents involved an as- sault on U.S. vice consul Ronald Harms as he was leaving a restau- rant after lunching with a dissident contact in April, and the severe beating in June of Andrew Eaplnosa, an American exchange student. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 lor ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (O vision of DCID 1/14 re Off-Duty Activities FROM: NO. DATE 18 July 1985 TO: (OfRcuc designation, room numb.,, and DATE building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) C/Policy Branch Attached is the response to SECOM regarding subject 2. indicating concurrence with the proposed revision, with two exceptions as noted. 3. C/PPG The document differs from Agency guidance in two areas: 4. a OS requires reporting "prior to" initiation of such 5. activities, not "immediately DD/P$M after' as suggested in paragraph one. 6. a Prepublication review is clearly spelled out for those 7. with access. DD/S B. 9. D/S 10. 11. 12. 1 1 1S FOA ,CONFIDENTTAk GPO : 1983 0 - 411-632 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SECOM-D-174: Revision of DCID 1/14 re Off-Duty Activities FR NO. DATE TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Drew a line across column after each comment.) Chairman, SECOM 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. T 610 EDIT" s Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman, SECJII Director of Security SUBJECT: Revision of DCID 1/14 re Off Duty Activities REFERENCE: 3ECOM-D-174, dtd 24 June 1985, Same Subject 1. This memorandum is in response to referenced request to comment on the proposed new paragraph 11 of DCID 1/14 which provides security policy guidance concerning off duty activities of persons holding or being considered for SCI access when those activities might conflict with security obligations. The following comments are offered: ? Paragraph 1. - The last sentence should be changed to read, "For those with access, reporting will be in writing to their cognizant security officer prior to (vice 'immediately following') initiation of employment or activities of potential concern". Part of the rationale for such reporting includes the opportunity for the Security Officer to make a security judgment prior to the individual's involvement in the activity. ? Paragraph 3. - The responsibility to submit documents for prepublication review should be more forcefully highlighed in the revision since those individuals with SCI access are required to sign such an agreement. 2. It is recommended that the above suggestions be incorporated into the revision of DCID 1/14. STAT STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL - ~P 0-7/`9 T* 5.nwoMc.sysnboi.room numbr, 77~ Initials Data !. 4. No Note and Return For Clsaance Per Conversation uestsd F For Correction Prepare Reply rculate For Your Information See Me meet tnvssti a nature inatlon Justi aw-L rc) rw"n 'i'"'LLe /". DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals. clearances, and similar actions FR7 OPTIONAL. FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) R (41 CW 01-11.206 STAT STAT STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 Iq Next 2 Page(s) In Document Denied STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1