REWARD FOR AGENCY EMPLOYEES AND AGENCY CONTRACTORS' EMPLOYEES PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ESPIONAGE ACTIVITIES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 32
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 18, 2010
• Sequence Number: 3
• Publication Date: August 9, 1985
• Content Type: MEMO

Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
9 AUG 13b5
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security
Policy and Plans Group
SUBJECT: Reward for Agency Employees and Agency
Contractors' Employees Providing Information
on Espionage Activities
1. As requested, attached are two proposed versions of a
recommendation regarding Subject to be forwarded to the DCI.
Staff research has come up with the following considerations:
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Iq
Next 10 Page(s) In Document Denied
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
Security Committee
SECOM-A-277
10 July 1985
AGENDA
Two Hundred and Eighty-sixth Meeting
Wednesday, 24 July 1985, 10:00 AM
Room 7D32, CIA Headquarters
Preliminary Comments (e.g. budget, proposed NSDD on overseas security,
Chairman's brief of SSCI Staffers)
ITEM 1 Approval of Minutes of 26 June 1985 meeting
ITEM 2 Discussion and Approval of revised Par. 11, DCID 1/14
ITEM 3 Discussion of assignment of responsibilities and accreditations
regarding SCIFs
ITEM 4 SECOM Staffing
ITEM 5 New Business
ITEM 6 Next Meeting (10:00 a.m., Wednesday, 21 August 1985, Room 7D32
CIA Headquarters
CONFIDENTIAL
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
PRELIMI&ARY COMMENTS
SECOM Budget proposals have had some recent activity with
the IC Staff. SECOM has been asked to resubmit those proposals
after the first group of proposals was turned down by the IC
Staff last Monday. After SECOM conversations with the IC
Staff, it became apparent that although the SECOM submissions
were made on 10 April to the IC Staff, the submissions had
somehow "fallen through the cracks." C/SECOM will give a
progress report at this meeting.
STAT
The proposed NDSS on overseas security is being coordinated
this date (17 July) with member The final DDA
version is being hand carried by for review and
comment. C/SECOM will comment on the status.
Chairman's brief of SSCI staffers will be a topic for
preliminary commentary.
ITEM 1 Approval of Minutes for 26 June 1985 meeting
Action Taken regarding the Minutes -
? Harassments and Provocations study forwarded to
appropriate offices for input. SECOM has granted us an
extension of the deadline to 20 August since SAG asked for more
time.
? DOE presentation on CULTS notice was forwarded to PSI
components and SEG.
? SAG notified of termination of Project Slammer.
ITEM 2 Discussion and Approval of Paragraph 11, DCID 1/14.
Agency response attached as TAB A. We suggested the
addition of the words "prior to" to paragraph one of the
document rather than "immediately following," as it refers to
the time element for reporting such outside activities. We
also suggested highlighting of the prepublication review
provision. Concurred with the rest of the addition.
ITEM 3 Discussion of assignment of responsibilities and
accreditations regarding SCIFs.
STAT has brought this to the attention of the
Computer Security Subcommittee. SECOM staff has not had
sufficient time to research the topic and will suggest a
working group be formed to conduct such research. Al Petit
will ask for deferral of discussion of the topic until the
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
August meeting. I (forwarded a short memorandum to
PPG (attached as TAB B) explaining the issue of assignment of
responsibilities and accreditations regarding SCIFs.
ITEM 4 SECOM Staffing - Discussion of a replacement for
Bob Murray.
STAT
ITEM 5 New Business - has none for this session. STAT
ITEM 6 Next Meeting Wed 21 August 1985.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied
Iq
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
CONFIDENTIAL
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FRO
DATE 15 August 1985
SEOCM: Harrassments and Provocations Study
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
C/POL BR
C/PPG
DD/P$M
D/S
FORM 61 O USE PREVIOUS
1-79 EDITIONS
OFFICER'S I COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
CONFIDENTIAL
Attached is a response to SEOCM
regarding subject. SECOM
extended the original deadline
to 20 August to accommodate
input from SAG and CI Staff.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
UUN r' 1 llr:1V'1' i4
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman, SECOM
Director of Secure y
SUBJECT: Harrassments and Provocations Study
1. This memorandum is in response to Chairman, SECOM's
request to provide updated material to the SECOM Harrassments
and Provocations Study.
2. The input forwarded has been obtained from the Office of
Security, Security Analysis Group and from this Agency's
Counterintelligence Staff. As requested, this material is in
"raw" form. It is understood that the SECOM staff will use
this material as basic and will prepare the final drafts in
unclassified form which will be returned for review and comment
prior to publication.
:OS/P&M/PPG
!Distribution:!
Orig - Adse:
1 - D/S:
OS Registry!
- PPG Chrono:
(15 August d5):
CONFIDENTIAL
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
CONFIDENTIAL
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
Security Committee
SECOM-D-176
25 June 1984
MEMORANDUM FOR: SECOM Members
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Chairman
Update of SECOM Harassments and Provoccations Study
1. Attached is a first draft of an update of the June 1982 SECOM Study
of Harassments and Provocations. Anecdotal accounts in the attachment are
sanitized summaries of classified and unclassified material submitted by
Community departments and agencies in the spring of 1984. Please advise if-*
the draft may properly be published at the unclassified (For Official Use
Only) level as was the case with the 1982 study. Issuance at that level makes
the study broadly useful for defensive briefings of a wide range of personnel,
including dependents. Pending member responses on the classification issue,
the attachment is tentatively marked Confidential.
2. It would be desirable to include more current material in the updated
study, particularly items reflecting current experience in the Soviet Union
now that Chernenko has come and gone and the Soviets seem less interested in
detente. It would be especially useful if material could be provided on the
experiences of travelers and tourists visiting Communist countries as well as
on assignees. Please provide any additional material that can be included in
the study.
3. Responses on the classification issue and current material should be
provided the SECOM staff by 23 July 1985.
Attachment
As Stated
CONFIDENTIAL
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
SECOM: Harassments and Provocations Study
FROM:
NO.
DATE
1 July 1985
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
ildi
)
b
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
ng
u
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
DD/PTAS
SECOM is updating the June
ts and
t
d
f H
1982
y o
arassmen
s
u
2.
Provocations against. Americans
assigned to, or traveling in,
e
d
USSR
E
t
E
th
,
as
ern
urop
an
e
3
China. The "anecdotes" are
C/OPS/PTAS
intended to support official
securit
briefin
s
iv
d
f
y
g
e
e
ens
4
for persons with access to
classified information who are
areas
t
th
li
t
.
ose
o
rave
ng
.
5.
DD/PSI
Attached, for your informa-
f the
i
ti
6
s a copy o
on,
previous study of Harassments
and Provocations, SECOM-D-222,
1982
d 24 J
d
t
.
une
e
a
7.
C/OPS/PSI
It is requested that DD/PTAS
th
e
route the tasking to
B
appropriate Area Security
Officers.
9.
CI Staff
Please provide updates to this
study to PPG by COB,
ednesday, 17 July 1985.
10.
Questions may be di ctly to
11.
1
Attachment
cc: C/EAB
1
C/SAG
C/SEG
4.
15.
FORM 610 USE DITI PREVIOUSONS
I-79
CONFIDENTIAL
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Director of
Central
Intelligence
A Study of Harassments
and Provocations
Prepared for
The Director of
Central Intelligence
by the
Security Committee
For Official Use Only
For Official Use Only
SECOM-D-222
24 June 1982
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
For Official Use Only
INTRODUCTION
This study describes harassments and provocations against Ameri-
cans assigned to or traveling in the USSR, Eastern Europe, and China.
The cases cited illustrate procedures used by Communist country
intelligence and security services and are intended to support official
defensive security briefings for persons with authorized access to
classified information who are traveling to those areas. ' iaterial in this
study was contributed by US Government departments and agencies
and describes incidents occurring in the 1978-81 period.
For purposes this study:
HARASSMENT means any action taken
against a person or group to prevent, inhibit, or
delay the achievement of personal or group objec-
tives (e.g., impeding collection of information by
assigned diplomats).
PROVOCATION means any action taken
against a person or group to induce self-damaging
action (e.g., attempts to involve Americans in illegal
activities).
Attempts by hostile services to recruit Americans to commit
espionage are outside the purview of this study,
iii
For Official Use Only
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Iq
Next 11 Page(s) In Document Denied
STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
' JNGLA55 i r 1
PAGE 001
TOR: 150057Z MAY 85
PP RUEAIIB
ZNR UUUUU ZOC STATE ZZH
STU6007
PP RL)EHC
DE RUFHNK #2072 1340736
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 140719Z MAY 85
FM AMEMBASSY HELSINKI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5549
INFO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 5408
BT
UtJCLAS HELSINKI 02072
E.O. 12356 N/A
TAGS: CASC (SIPPLE, REGINA)
SUBJECT: EXPULSION OF AMCIT FROM USSR
1.MS. REGINA SIPPLE, BORN OCTOBER 29, 1952 IN COLORADO,
ISSUED SAN FRANCISCO MAY 20, 1983,
CALLED AT EMBASSY ON MAY 13 TO REPORT THAT SHE HAD BEEN
DENIED ENTRY TO THE SOVIET UNION.
2. MS. SIPPLE ARRIVED MOSCOW ON MAY 12 WITH HER TOUR
GROUP. SHE SAYS THAT UPON SEARCHING HER LUGGAGE SOVIET
CUSTOMS OFFICIALS DISCOVERED TAPED CHILDRENS'S MUSIC
ACCOMPANYING SMALL BOOKLETS. THE BOOKLETS CONTAINED THE
"SERMON ON THE MOUNT" PRINTED IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN ON
FACING PAGES. SHE WAS ACCUSED OF ATTEMPTING TO SMUGGLE
BANNED LITERATURE INTO THE USSR AND THE MATERIAL WAS
CONFISCATED.
4. MS. SIPPLE HAS ASKED THAT HER PARENTS BE NOTIFIED
THAT SHE IS WELL AND THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR CONCERN FOR
3. AFTER BEING DETAINED OVERNIGHT SHE WAS REQUIRED TO
RETURN TO HELSINKI. SHE CAME DIRECTLY FROM AIRPORT TO
EMBASSY. WE HAVE ARRANGED HOTEL ACCOMMODATION FOR HER AT
THE RED CROSS (PUNAINEN RISTI) HOTEL, TEHTAANKATU 1,
TELEPHONE 176811. SHE IS ATTEMPTING TO CHANGE AIRLINE
TICKETS FOR RETURN TO U.S. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
UNCLASSIFIED
STAT
STAT
STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Iq
Next 13 Page(s) In Document Denied
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
SECRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Update of SECOM'S Study of Harassments and Provocations
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
Chief, Security Anaylsis Group
DATE
08 August 1985
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
1.
C/OPS/PSI
is
2.
C/PPG
t o OA
I'Ll COs
O u
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
FORM 610 "EDITPREVI
IONSUS
1-79
ECRET
5
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
12 AUG S
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Policy and Plans Group
ATTENTION:
FROM:
ie , Security Analysis p
SUBJECT: Update of SECOM'S Study of Harassments and
Provocations
1. Attached herewith are examples of harassments and
provocations for inclusion in the SECOM Study of Harassments and
Provocations. Recruitment attempts are not included as previous
memoranda stated that recruitment attempts are outside the purview
of the SECOM study.
2. Case 1 can be utilized in an unclassified version of the
booklet. Case 2 was derived from information contained in a
report of another U. S. Government Agerrcy and must ified
at the secret level.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Unclassified
CASE 1
During 1984/85 Soviet and Eastern Bloc media on a continuing
basis published or broadcast information purporting to identify
CIA officers. Some of their speculations are correct but many are
not. One of the major thrusts of this activity is to simply
harass the individual and embarrass the U. S. Government.
Unclassified
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
FROM:
SECOM: Harassments and Provocations Study
-15NO_
TO: Officer designation, room number, and
building)
C/OPS/PSI
1 July 1985
SECOM is updating the June
1982 study of Harassments and
Provocations against Americans
assigned to, or traveling in,
the USSR, Eastern Europe and
China. The "anecdotes" are
intended to support official
defensive security briefings
for persons with access to
classified information who are
traveling to those areas.
JUL
Attached, for your informa-
tion, is a copy of the
previous study of Harassments
and Provocations, SECOM-D-222,
dated 24 June 1982.
It is requested that DD/PTAS
route the tasking to the
appropriate Area Security
Officers.
awl
Please provide updates to this
study to PPG by COB,
Wednesday, 17 July 1985.
cc: C/EAB ~-~/~
C/SAG `-~r-~
i / C/SEG
1-79 EDITIONS
CONFIDENTIAL
25X1
25X1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Director of
Central
Intelligence
A Study of Harassments
and Provocations
Prepared for
The Director of
Central Intelligence
by the
Security Committee
For Official Use Only
For Official Use Only
SECOM-D-222
24 June 1982
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
For Official Use Only
INTRODUCTION
This study describes harassments and provocations against Ameri-
cans assigned to or traveling in the USSR, Eastern Europe, and China.
The cases cited illustrate procedures used by Communist country
intelligence and security services and are intended to support official
defensive security briefings for persons with authorized access to
classified information who are traveling to those areas. Material in this
study was contributed by US Government departments and agencies
and describes incidents occurring in the 1978-81 period.
For purposes this study:
HARASSMENT means any action taken
against a person or group to prevent, inhibit, or
delay the achievement of personal or group objec-
tives (e.g., impeding collection of information by
assigned diplomats).
PROVOCATION means any action taken
against a person or group to induce self-damaging
action (e.g., attempts to involve Americans in illegal
activities).
Attempts by hostile services to recruit Americans to commit
espionage are outside the purview of this study.
iii
For Official Use Only
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Iq
Next 7 Page(s) In Document Denied
STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
For Official Use Only
CONCLUSIONS
Security officers of organizations whose personnel
are authorized access to national security information
should give them advance, defensive security briefings
whenever they are to travel to Communist countries.
Briefings should illustrate tactics and procedures used
in harassments and provocations.
The importance of immediate reporting to the
nearest US diplomatic post of actual or suspected
incidents should be emphasized. Those being briefed
should be told that, while acknowledging embarrassing
of foolish acts is not pleasant or easy, failure to report
all incidents involving them exposes them to the
prospect of even more serious follow-up action by
hostile intelligence agencies without the opportunity
for the US Government to protect them. Further,
failure to report denies other Americans the informa-
tion they should have to avoid problems during their
own travel. Assurances should be given that US au-
thorities will provide all possible assistance to help
Americans who are the victims of reported harass-
ments or provocations. The continued usefulness of
studies such as this depends on receipt of information
describing new harassments and provocations. Security
officers using this publication are encouraged to con-
tact persons from their organizations who are return-
ing from travel to Communist countries to determine
what they experienced or saw in the way of actual or
apparent harassments or provocations. Pertinent infor-
mation obtained through these contacts should be
reported through appropriate channels to the security
component of the Government department or agency
with security cognizance over your organization.
11
For Official Use Only
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 11 -
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1 `~~?~C
w9day, .I :. 1Y84 THE WASHINGTON POST
`Harassment' in Leningrad Leads to
U.S. Warning f
or Tr
avelers
By John M. Goshko
Washington Post$tatt Writer
The State Department, citing
"approximately a dozen cases` of
r grant harassment" of Americans
in Leningrad during the past `six
months, yesterday issued a "travel
advisory" warning U.S. citizens that
they face danger of arrest and de-
nial of access to U.S. officials if they
visit that Soviet city.
The advisory followed an incident
Thursday in which a Marine guard
assigned to the U.S. consulate there
was beaten by Soviet police.
Department spokesman . Alan
gomberg also disclosed yesterday
that an American professor was
arrested by plainclothes police in
Leningrad on July 28 and held for
two hours without being allowed to
contact the iconsulate.
"Today's- advisot-,;gn Leningrad
is the first to ca*tiol .America>ns
traveling there that the U.S. gov-
ernment cannot guarantee that the
Soviet Union will adhere to provi-
sions of the U.S.-U.S.S.R. consular
convention, stipulating the right of
access to consular officials in the
event of arrest or detention," a de-
partment statement said.
Department officials said adviso-
ries have been issued in the past
about Soviet travel. But, they not-
ed, the earlier advisories have in-
volved possible problems in obtain-
The officials said Leningrad was
singled out because the majority of
serious incidents pecurred there.
Some cases, beginning with an at-
tack on a U.S. consular official last
April, have been publicized previ-
ously, but yesterday's advisory in-
dicated a widespread pattern of in-
cidents involving private American
travelers as well as U.S. officials.
The officials said the frequency of
incidents in the Leningrad area
could not be ascribed solely to ten-
sion between the Reagan adminis-
tration and the Soviet government.
They gave as one possible expla-
nation the fact that the police and
KGB officials in Leningrad have a
reputation for being especially
ing visas or hotel rooms in some
parts of the Soviet Union.
They also said that after a Ko-
rean. Air Lines jetliner was shot
down by a Soviet plane- last Septem-
ber, an advisory warned` that trav-
elers in the Soviet Union might
have trouble obtaining plane tick-
ets.
Leningrad rivals Moscow as the
principal center for foreign tourists
in the Soviet Union, and the advi-
sory reflected what U.S. officials
said was a desire to protect Amer-
icans from possiblg danger, and to
emphasize to the Soviet govern-
ment U.S. concern about "unsatis-
factory Soviet, resonse' in dealing
with the situation.:..
tough in dealing with suspected
breaches of state security.
"There have- been several cases
of unlawful detention.of tourists by
the Soviet security?Orghns following
innocent contacts with Soviet cit-
izens,". the advisory sajtl. "During
detention, Americans,. have been
denied. their rights;: under the U.S.-
U.S.S.R. consular,, convention, to
communicate with an American
consular officer and to be visited by
him without delay. American tour-
ists have been subjected to arbi-
trary and in many cases unjustifi-
ably embarrassing searches of their
personal effects .... "
In describing the July 28 incident,
Romberg said an American profes-
sor, whom he would not identify,
was arrested on the way to a meet-
ing with a Soviet scholar who spe-
cializes in 18th century literature
and was held at a police station for
two hours. Romberg said the pro-
fessor was told "that a new Soviet
law which took effect on July 1 did
not require that foreigners be
granted access to their consular
representatives unless they were
being deported."
Other incidents involved an as-
sault on U.S. vice consul Ronald
Harms as he was leaving a restau-
rant after lunching with a dissident
contact in April, and the severe
beating in June of Andrew Eaplnosa,
an American exchange student.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
lor ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (O
vision of DCID 1/14 re Off-Duty Activities
FROM:
NO.
DATE
18 July 1985
TO: (OfRcuc designation, room numb.,, and
DATE
building)
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
C/Policy Branch
Attached is the response to
SECOM regarding subject
2.
indicating concurrence with the
proposed revision, with two
exceptions as noted.
3.
C/PPG
The document differs from Agency
guidance in two areas:
4.
a OS requires reporting
"prior to" initiation of such
5.
activities, not "immediately
DD/P$M
after' as suggested in paragraph
one.
6.
a Prepublication review is
clearly spelled out for those
7.
with access.
DD/S
B.
9.
D/S
10.
11.
12.
1
1
1S
FOA
,CONFIDENTTAk
GPO : 1983 0 - 411-632
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SECOM-D-174: Revision of DCID 1/14 re Off-Duty
Activities
FR
NO.
DATE
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Drew a line across column after each comment.)
Chairman, SECOM
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
T 610 EDIT" s
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman, SECJII
Director of Security
SUBJECT: Revision of DCID 1/14 re Off Duty Activities
REFERENCE: 3ECOM-D-174, dtd 24 June 1985, Same Subject
1. This memorandum is in response to referenced request to
comment on the proposed new paragraph 11 of DCID 1/14 which
provides security policy guidance concerning off duty
activities of persons holding or being considered for SCI
access when those activities might conflict with security
obligations. The following comments are offered:
? Paragraph 1. - The last sentence should be changed
to read, "For those with access, reporting will be in
writing to their cognizant security officer prior to (vice
'immediately following') initiation of employment or
activities of potential concern". Part of the rationale
for such reporting includes the opportunity for the
Security Officer to make a security judgment prior to the
individual's involvement in the activity.
? Paragraph 3. - The responsibility to submit
documents for prepublication review should be more
forcefully highlighed in the revision since those
individuals with SCI access are required to sign such an
agreement.
2. It is recommended that the above suggestions be
incorporated into the revision of DCID 1/14.
STAT
STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL - ~P
0-7/`9
T*
5.nwoMc.sysnboi.room numbr,
77~
Initials
Data
!.
4.
No
Note and Return
For Clsaance
Per Conversation
uestsd
F
For Correction
Prepare Reply
rculate
For Your Information
See Me
meet
tnvssti a
nature
inatlon
Justi
aw-L rc)
rw"n 'i'"'LLe /".
DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals.
clearances, and similar actions
FR7
OPTIONAL. FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
R (41 CW 01-11.206
STAT
STAT
STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1
Iq
Next 2 Page(s) In Document Denied
STAT
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/10/18: CIA-RDP87-00812R000200110003-1