PROPOSED REVISION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 12036

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP87B01034R000200030009-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 2, 2005
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 1, 1981
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP87B01034R000200030009-2.pdf180.04 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/08/15 : CIA-RDP87B01034R000200030009-2 DD/A Red 1-1 g t OCC 81-03622 1 May 1981 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence VIA: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence I I irec or, Intelligence Community Staff Acting General Junsel SUBJECT: Proposed Revision of Executive Order 12036 REFEREt CES : A. Memorandum from Richard V. Allen, dated April 24, 1981, Subject: Revision of E.O. 12036. B. Memorandum from James W. Nance, dated April 1, 1981, Subject: Revisions to Executive order 12036. 1. Attached for your review and approval is a proposed revision of Executive Order (EO) 12036 (Tab A), which has been developed based upon the two NFIC meetings held on this subject and numerous staff-level meetings and discussions. Section 2 of the proposed new order has been written from a positive stand- point to stress that the intelligence activities mentioned therein are authorized, lawful and proper when conducted in accordance with- the Order. Thus, it departs significantly from the negative and condemnatory tone of EO 12036- 2. The proposed Order takes into account the advice provided by the Intelligence Community through the NFIC. While not all positions taken by the Community have been accommodated, we feel that the proposed new Order strikes a blance between the competing views that have been expressed. We wish to ca-11 to your attention the following spec"ific provisions and -issues: a. The language contained in section 1-706 concerning the reporting of crimes by nonemployees represents a Approved For Release 2005/08/15 : CIA-RDP87BO1034R000200030009-2 Approved For Release 2005/08/15 : CIA-RDP87BO1034R000200030009-2 compromise developed by the Central Intelligence Agency Its (CIA) and the Department oftJustice ticee(DoJ).that would be acceptability depends upon developed to govern the manner in which such crimes are reported and how classified inDooJmatCIA hand as tentativ eenc lye interests would be handled by agreed to a draft set of procedure interestss tAowever,dDoJehastnot accommodate intelligence yet given its tentativenapproval thattwouldsbepunacceptabledtoay wish to make certain changes CIA. Should that prove to the proposed compromise language teto report nonemployee rejected and that thefrequirement crimes be eliminated b. Section 2-307 of EO 12036 prohibits any agency of the Intelligence Community from nrequesting ooor oencoiraginn, to either directly or indirectly, ay P g the Order. This section b y unddertake activities forbidden has been retained, but has been reworded touna'rowiitstscope so as to prohibit an agency from carrying by proxy" any forbidden activity. This revision eliminates the vague requirement that intelligence agencies not "encourage" activities forbidden by the Order. c. Section 2-201(a) reflects compromise language e proposed by Doi which basically retains the standrddinethey current Executive order for approval of agency pro the Attorney General. However, the compromise providesfor appeal to the National Security Council on any not c d er e which the Attorney General and agency hea This appeals provision, coupled with the requirement that the Attorney General provide a statement of reasons for not approving any procedure, should be sufficient to prevent the staff-level frustration of procedures proposed by the Intelligence Community. section d. The proposed new Order retains a modified on the National Security Council (NSC) and provides that the NSC shall be the highest level approval authority 'for foreign intelligence, counterintelligence and special activities. This-section also authorizes t e NSC to estab be necessary- lisp such committees as may the eletion of d b t y e f ills the void in ..the Order crea sections 1-2 and. 1-3 as a result of your proposed National 2. Security Decision Directive No. Approved For Release 2005/08/15 : CIA-RDP87BO1034R000200030009-2 Approved For Release 2005/08/15 : CIA-RDP87BO1034R000200030009-2 e. The new section 1-2 of the Order authorizes the Director of Central Intelligence to establish such advisory boards, councils or groups as may be required for advice on matters of Community concern. Membership on such groups will include representatives of collection, processing and analytical components when substantive intelligence matters are considered, and, in addition, representatives of the Secretary of Commerce, Attorney General, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and Office of the Secretary of Defense when nonsubstantive matters are consid- ered. f. A brief drafting history (Tab B) has been developed to accompany the Order. It reflects the positive approach to intelligence activities represented by the Order and reflects minor interpretative points not considered of stif_ficient importance for incorporation in the order. 4. We recommend that you approve the proposed new Execu- tive Order on United States Intelligence Activities and, as requester. by the references, transmit it to the National Security Council for review and approval by the President. A cover memo- randum to Richard Allen for this purpose is attached at Tab C. In addition, in keeping with your commitment to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, transmittal letters to Chairmen Goldwater and Boland are attached at Tabs D and E, respectively. STAT Attachments: As stated. Approved For Release 2005/08/15 : CIA-RDP87BO1034R000200030009-2