PROPOSED NATIONAL CLEARANCE/INVESTIGATIVE POLICY (U)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP87B01034R000500030010-7
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
July 22, 2005
Sequence Number:
10
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 19, 1980
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 85.81 KB |
Body:
Approved For Relea fRP87B01034R000500030010-7
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
Security Committee
SECOM-D-316
1 9 AUG 1980
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Donald P. Gregg
National Security Council Staff Member
SCC Counterintelligence Working Group
SUBJECT: Proposed National Clearance/Investigative
Policy
1. The 5 February 1980 meeting of the SCC Counter-
intelligence Working Group heard a report from my predecessor
on the differing personnel security standards within the
Intelligence Community. The SCC/CIWG then asked the DCI
Security Committee to study the problem from a government-
wide viewpoint and make recommendations for a national clear-
ance/investigative standards policy.
2. Attached is a further analysis of these clearance
differences within the Intelligence Community along with
identification of factors bearing on the problem and. some
tentative suggestions for a solution.
3. There are enormous problems in this area and they
will not easily be solved, aggressiveness and eagerness not-
withstanding. The resource implications are particularly
significant. So are the possibilities suggested such as a
national policy sanctioning the broader use of polygraph
which could have favorable impact on resource requirements.
4. In a series of meetings scheduled starting after
Labor Day the Security Committee will systematically address
the specific issues and problems involved. We will seek to
25X1
25X1
26X1
. NT! A i..
Approved For Release 2005/08/02 : CIA-RDP87BO1034R000500030010-7
Approved For Release 2005/08/02 CIA_-RDP87B01034R000500030010-7
determine what is needed in today's environment to make
valid assessments of loyalty, character and trustworthiness.
We will try to determine how best to obtain the necessary
data, including the value of the polygraph. We will attempt
to prepare cost/risk alternatives for SCC/CIWG consideration.
5. Any reactions you have from your vantage point would
be most useful and appreciated, particularly if received
before 10 September. I hope to give you by the end
September a target date for overall completion.
Attachment
Distribution:
Orig - Addressee w/att
1 -
O
/05 w/att
S Registr
y w/att
1 -
S
ECOM Chro
no w/att
1 -
S
ECOM Subj
ect w/att
SECOM/I h (8/7/80)
Revised: rjw (8/19/80)
25X1
25tX1
25
X1
Approved For Release 6'- .C1A-RbA&7B01034R000500030010-7