DRAFT REVISION OF DCID 1/19

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP87B01034R000500180030-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 24, 2005
Sequence Number: 
30
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP87B01034R000500180030-9.pdf132.28 KB
Body: 
c Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP87BO1034R000500180030-9 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security FROM: Chief, Policy Branch, PPG SUBJECT: Draft Revision of DCID 1/19 REFERENCES: A. Draft Revision of DCID 1/19, pages 8 and 9 B. Memo for NFIB from DCI, dated 28 September 1981, NdA for SCI (NFIB-9.2/64) C. NdA Forms 4066 and 4193 1. This memorandum is for your information and requests your decision on a matter of policy. The issue of policy is stated in paragraph 2. The Chief, Special Security Center, has voiced concern that paragraph 5, page 8, of the draft DCID 1/19 not only is contrary to the DCI's wishes but is contrary to a policy deci- sion made by you on 2 October 1981 that CIA, non-NFIB or private sector persons will not be "retrofitted" with new Nondisclosure Agreements (NdA) Form 4193 which contains a prepublication review provision. The sense of the paragraph;-that "all persons holding or being given SCI access shall sign an NdA" (i.e., line 17) in the context of the "mandatory:", prepublication review provision (i.e., lines 23-24) is that a "retrofit" is required. 3. The DCI, in his memorandum of 28 September 1981, to the rational Foreign Intelligence Board (NFIB) on the subject:. of NdA's, stated that Form 4193 "may" be used by the Comounity to satisfy the requirement for a NdA for SCI access. Senior Intel- ligence Officers were "encouraged" to include a prepublication review requirement in any alternative form of NdA used. The only thing mandated by the DCI was that they "should use the same form for all SCI accesses they grant." The DCI did not mandate a "retrofit." Your policy decision of 2 October 1981 complies with this DCI mandate. 4. As the Chief, SSC, has revi l . toi.nted outa STAT "rettrofit" by CIA would involve Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP87BO1034R000500180030-9 STAT STAT STAT Approved For Releas(t2005/12/14: CIA-RDP87BO1034ROP05Q0180030-9 contractor employees as well as some 2,000 non-NFIB customers, many of whom are Cabinet-level officer or Presidential appointees. On 2 Octobe 1981 you advised the DD/P&M, "Per our agreement with let's use the new NdA starting now on all new SCI briefings for either Government or private-sector persons." As stated in the draft DCID 1/19, the "mandatory" use of the pre-- tion review provision would necessitate "retrofitting" I Iontractor employees and 2,000 non-NFIB customers. Agency start employees are covered by internal secrecy agreements and the Snepp Case. Unless non-NFIB and contractor (private sector) persons are "retrofitted," however, the Agency will not have-the ,protection that it enjoys with staff employees by virtue of the Snepp Casey