DRAFT REVISION OF DCID 1/19
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP87B01034R000500180030-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date:
August 24, 2005
Sequence Number:
30
Case Number:
Content Type:
MF
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 132.28 KB |
Body:
c
Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP87BO1034R000500180030-9
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security
FROM:
Chief, Policy Branch, PPG
SUBJECT: Draft Revision of DCID 1/19
REFERENCES: A. Draft Revision of DCID 1/19, pages 8 and 9
B. Memo for NFIB from DCI, dated 28 September
1981, NdA for SCI (NFIB-9.2/64)
C. NdA Forms 4066 and 4193
1. This memorandum is for your information and requests
your decision on a matter of policy. The issue of policy is
stated in paragraph
2. The Chief, Special Security Center, has voiced concern
that paragraph 5, page 8, of the draft DCID 1/19 not only is
contrary to the DCI's wishes but is contrary to a policy deci-
sion made by you on 2 October 1981 that CIA, non-NFIB or private
sector persons will not be "retrofitted" with new Nondisclosure
Agreements (NdA) Form 4193 which contains a prepublication review
provision. The sense of the paragraph;-that "all persons holding
or being given SCI access shall sign an NdA" (i.e., line 17) in
the context of the "mandatory:", prepublication review provision
(i.e., lines 23-24) is that a "retrofit" is required.
3. The DCI, in his memorandum of 28 September 1981, to the
rational Foreign Intelligence Board (NFIB) on the subject:. of
NdA's, stated that Form 4193 "may" be used by the Comounity to
satisfy the requirement for a NdA for SCI access. Senior Intel-
ligence Officers were "encouraged" to include a prepublication
review requirement in any alternative form of NdA used. The only
thing mandated by the DCI was that they "should use the same form
for all SCI accesses they grant." The DCI did not mandate a
"retrofit." Your policy decision of 2 October 1981 complies
with this DCI mandate.
4. As the Chief, SSC, has revi l . toi.nted outa STAT
"rettrofit" by CIA would involve
Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP87BO1034R000500180030-9
STAT
STAT
STAT
Approved For Releas(t2005/12/14: CIA-RDP87BO1034ROP05Q0180030-9
contractor employees as well as some 2,000 non-NFIB customers,
many of whom are Cabinet-level officer or Presidential appointees.
On 2 Octobe 1981 you advised the DD/P&M, "Per our agreement with
let's use the new NdA starting now on all new SCI
briefings for either Government or private-sector persons." As
stated in the draft DCID 1/19, the "mandatory" use of the pre--
tion review provision would necessitate "retrofitting"
I Iontractor employees and 2,000 non-NFIB customers. Agency
start employees are covered by internal secrecy agreements and the
Snepp Case. Unless non-NFIB and contractor (private sector)
persons are "retrofitted," however, the Agency will not have-the
,protection that it enjoys with staff employees by virtue of the
Snepp Casey