SPECIAL REPORT 'I.U. AND THE CIA'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
21
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 29, 2004
Sequence Number: 
31
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 15, 1968
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4.pdf2.8 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/01/11: CI1 " STATES GOVERNMENT emorandum Director, suBJECT: Special Report "I.U. and the CIA" 1. Enclosed is a copy of the Spectator of 5 November 1968 purporting to "expose" CIA activity on the I.U. campus. As you can see, it's a tempest in a teapot, but we thought you would be interested in seeing it anyway. We have not heard what action Dr. Sebeok plans to take in regard to the evident theft of letters from his file. So far he has made no statement. 2. Dr. Robert F. Byrnes, whose unlikeness appears on page 8, tells us that the Spectator is the voice for the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), an anarchist group which at I.U. has a membership of a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 300. Byrnes states that in his opinion there is an evident reaction on campus to the disruptive activities of these people and he expects it to become much stronger in the next year. The former editor has been convicted of being a draft dodger. We do not know where the Spectator gets its funds, although part comes from special events which SDS sponsors, and part from sales. The group at I.U. profess to hate Communism, but also profess an admiration for Chairman Mao. We do not know how they reconcile the two views. 3. Our estimate of the effect of the "report" on Agency activity at I.U. is that it may actually help our relations since most people will think the attack on Sebeok and the theft of his papers is reprehensible. Certainly the report will do no damage. Incidentally- ha I1QC n4: 25X1 01 00 I File: Ind. Univ., General Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4>- RDP83 01314R000300230031-4 15 November 1968 25X1 Volume VII, No. 7 November 5, 1968 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 SPE@TATOR a5~ of this Agen ads for lingui :wised by Pro, on to ass edge of asing de- 'sboth in arty requires ith a thorough background knowl- give us the names and er qualified for employ- or, encourage them to above, with reference cerely yours, L U. c~c DONALD V. MULCAHY sistant Chief, Procurement Personnel Office Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 CENTRAL. INTELLIGENCE AG on are undoubte ats in these a industry. Thi combine their language a on of curer world affairs AMERKR I'll~?os' (I FOLLOW ORD 1_odE THERE 15 N, PAV5 OBE E MUN1SM C KILL DRAFT 1,5 GooD T" OWTA 'I VICTORY 'IV 1 ,, SALUTE F11 NA t 1s A L L Approved For Release 2005/01/11 CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 The SPECTATOR, November 5, 1968 Editor: Mike King Managing Editor: Jim Lubek Exchange Editor: .Pane-Dill,,encourt Literary Editot:'BQb Klawitter Drama Editor: Chuck Kleinhans Cinema Editor: Kevin Sheets Music Editor: Mike Bourne Layout: Mary Kleinhans, Mimi BardagJy Production Managers: Charlotte Allison, David Zielinsk.t Artists: Bob Gaber, Susan Butorac, Mary Connors, Kathy Connors, Lynn Epstein, Sylvia Smith Production: Allan Smith, Dave Cahill, John Levindofske, Doug Falls, Charles Ostrofsky, Larry Bergman, Karen Goodman Amy Horn Typists: Charlotte Allison, Elizabeth Erskine, Judy Talty, Hannah Sard, Bonnie Poillion. Greg Faust, Mary Hether, Pam Scott , Ann Gardener, Sue Wachel Contributing Editors: Bob Johnson, David. Cahill, Bernie Madura, Richard Watson, Jane Dillencourt, Ann Wagner Ad Manager: D. Scott Hess. Circulation Manager: Mark Richter Editor-in-Exile: James Retherford Copr. The SPECTATOR, 1968 423 S. Fess Bloomington,' Indiana 47401 812-339-4995 Material reprintable when credit.is given to The SPECTATOR. All postage paid at Bloomington, Indiana TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADITORIALS IU AND THE CIA SDS SPECIAL REPORT BLACK POWER OR DEATH By OBI EGBUNA THE CASE OF THE KNOXVILLE COLLEGE STUDENTS By SSAC ROTC - COUNTER-INSURGENCY By MILLARD FILLMORE CASE OF PLANTED PIPES By BERNIE MADURA DARK BAG By BOB JOHNSON MEMORIES OF TRANSIENT SHAPES By CHARLES ECKERT PERCY HOUGHTON IS ALIVE? By KEVIN SHEETS WAITING FOR THE REVOLUTION By CHARLES KLEINHANS DON LEE - THINK BLACK By LARRY COLEMAN LETTERS Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 ici!i su~ET~N 19 20 'The SPECTATOR, November 5, 1968. Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 JOLTIN'JOE CLOSED UNIVERSITY The publication today of the special SDS report on Indiana University and the CIA serves to underline the conflict of rhetoric and of act in President Wells' recent statement on the "open university" (IDS, Friday, November 1). While indeed it may be clear to the interim President that IU takes no political stand, and in no way cooperates with secret government agencies, it is not so clear to us. The story speaks for itself. A FREE PRESS Largely because of The SPECTATOR, a Faculty Council committee today is recommending that Council meetings be open to the press on a regular basis, with only "executive sessions" excluded. We welcome this long- overdue step, which was requested by the Student Senate last year. Jerry Hicks, editor-in-chief of the Daily Student, will speak to the Council today on this issue, just as he did last Tuesday at the "open meeting." We support what he said then: There is a great disenchantment with gov- erning bodies among all students, regardless of the length of their hair or size of their side- burns. There is a lack of understanding of their functions; also, the bodies do not keep themselves open to public record. It is es- sential to democracy that government bodies keep themselves open to the public, or at min- imum to the press. These bodies deal with things that affect people's lives, and people want to know the details of what is done as well as the final decision. r In closed meetings the press cannot report what happened, but just what officials said happened. Their vested interests and personal involvement prevent accurate reporting. Most closed sessions should be opened. Some argue that the news should occa- sionally be suppressed. The New York Times at government request did not print what it knew about the upcoming Bay of Pigs invasion. President Kennedy later said "perhaps you should have stopped it by blowing the story." The seemingly imminent selection of Dean Joseph Sutton as Indiana University's new President was received by the Spectator with a mixture of trepidation and delight. Fear, because it has always been clear where Joltin' Joe stands on dissent in general and the Spectator in particular. And joy, for basically the same reason. We know who our enemies are. This is the same Dean Sutton who last year charged into the Spectator's on-campus offices with an ax, ready to do his part for IU, God, and The (Carrie) Nation. At any real educational institution, for such an action, the good Dean would have immediately been bounced. His fate seems instead to be promotion to the presi- dency, for which we can only thank the progressive ideals of the Trustees. We congratulate Dean Sutton on his impending vic- tory, and hope he soon recovers from the health prob- lem which we understood was the only obstacle standing in his way. It is going to be a long haul, as we are sure Mr. Wells will tell him. As for his future relations with the Spectator, just wait till we get our ax. Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 page 4 The SPECTATOR, November 5, 1968 Center for nternat io nal Affairs Preface By DAN McCORMICK, VIRGINIA KNIGHT, AND RICHARD WATSON The university is experiencing a conflict of inter- ests, a conflict between its function as an educational institution and its obligation to service the needs of industry and government. In an attempt to combine its functions, the university has sacrificed its ability to stimulate critical thinking in students in order to bet- ter train them to fill the specialized jobs being created by government and industry. To repeat the clichC: training is replacing education, while the uni- versity is becoming an elite vocational school. The easiest.way to document these charges is to study the careers of the most successful members of the faculty of the establishment. The faculty is that organ of the university most directly involved in the process of education -- whether it be one of liberation or manipulation. Therefore, those, professors who have dis- `tinguished themselves in the university ought to pro- vide us with a good indication of the traits which are encouraged and rewarded in the faculty at large. They should provide us with a base from which to generalize something about the goals of the institutions which have rewarded them so handsomely. These are the assumptions on which rests the ESPECIAL REPORT SPECIAL REPORT on International Activities, Area Studies and the C A at Indiana Un vers t , prepared by an SDS Specie Research Committee, 30 68; which is being made public this week. By examining several "Distin- guished Professors," the Committee reveals some startling facts about what actually distinguishes those men. It is our opinion, after reading the report, that the university community can no longer afford to hide itself under the cloak of the "open, value-free" aca- demy, especially when the CIA is sharing the same cloak. We have a responsibility as members of the intellectual community to take a stand on the non-educational activi- ties going on in our midst. The university has commit- ted itself to policies of dubious educational value at the behest of administrators and faculty who have clear ties to government and industry. To permit a small group of influential men with special interests to determine the course the university will follow in the future stakes us'as an act of cowardice and timidity -- an evasion of responsibility on the part of the rest of the academic community. We recommend that this report be studied well, for its implications are far-reaching, both in terms of the nature of the university, and the grounds on which student activists base their demands for change. InternatiOnal Activities, Area Studies and the CIA at Indiana University Our research has focused on Indiana University's government ties. The plethora of international pro- grams at IU has mirrored the shifting cold war priori- ties of the US government abroad. The men who have planned those programs have had intimate ties with the government and have been influential in creating aca- demic programs which would efficiently service govern- ment needs for area specialists and train reliable na- tive public and business administrators with whom the US could conduct its business abroad. What a. S_3t ki?-~Pw J o t se~ceral_of the key figures indicates that the CIA had its fingers in the -goulash from the beginning. On the basis of our infor- mation now, we can place area studies programs and institutes such as the Russian and East European (REE) Institute, the Uralic and,Altaic Studies Center, the Asian Studies Program and most of the other interdisci- plinary programs in, a new context, one in which scho- larly research transcends narrow departmental barriers to form an interdisciplinary problem-solving team, one that performs the CIA's problem-solving. The man with whom we are most familiar is Thomas A. Sebeok, Distinguished Professor of Linguistics, who might never have set sail for the spicy shores of Academe had he had his way. In August, 1950, at the outset of what was to become an illustrious career, Sebeok wrote to Mr. C. R. Kerlin of the CIA: I have just returned from the East and had considerable time meanwhile to think over the interview I recently had with you. I am quite convinced that I wish to place at your disposal whatever expertness I may possess. . . . I should greatly welcome an immediate investigation, if this could be arranged, so as to avoid delay if my services suddenly be called upon later on. Please inform me on my chances of employ- ment with you and kindly keep in touch with me. But as is often the case, the CIA decided it could use him better. within the university than in its direct employ. Sebeok was a scholar who combined his "lan- guage ability with a thorough comprehension of current world affairs and background knowledge of (his) lin- guistic area" to come up with the CIA's formula for in$tant academic success. (Quoted from a letter of 2/26151, from CIA assistant Chief of Procurement, Personnel Office, Donald V. Mulcahy, to Thomas A. Se- beok). A Hungarian immigrant (he immigrated in 1937), Sebe9k is_ a ,~specia,lis_t in East-and-Mid-European lin- guistics. Ae was the founder and first chairman of the Uralic and. Altaic Studies Department and'the first Director of-the Uralic and Altaic Language Area Center, the only one of its kind in the country. "Uralic and Altaic studies cover a geographical area ranging from the Atlantic to the Pacific, from the Arctic to the Mediterranean. The total speakers for all the Uralic and Altaic languages is between 110 and 120 million". (p. 131, 19.67-68 IU Bulletin, College of Arts and Sciences). This department conveniently includes the peoples in and on the borders of the Eurasian communist bloc, from the subject peoples of the Soviet Socialist Republics, to Korea, the Turkic and Mongolian popula- tions of China. The Area Center was established in 1963 by the National Defense Education Act. The study of these languages grew out of IU's wartime work with Altaic languages. It; had a "wartime contract for the crash training of linguists in the Altaic languages, a scho- larly designation -- derived from the name of the Altai mountain range -- for a number of languages whic'z roughly includes the Turkic, Mongol, and (Manchu-) Tunguz languages. This led IU to import a number of Turks as language "informants" and provided the uni- versity with a sizable group of Turkish alumni -- but it also provided a postwar base for a strong program in these esoteric tongues". (p. 226 The University Looks Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 Approved For Release 2005/01/11 : CIA-RDP88-01314R000300230031-4 The SPECTATOR, November 5, 1968 Abroad, (ULA), a report from Education and World Af- fairs). It also led Thomas A. Sebeok to send some graduate students abroad as "informants" or intelligence- gatherers--at least their foreign studies facilitated intelligence-gathering. While one of his students was on a Fuibright in Norway,- Charles W. Mathews, regional CIA agent based in St. Louis, Missouri, wrote: In your next letter to your student who is studying under a Fulbright scholarship, you might suggest that.he pick up any maps or charts of the area