THE WASHINGTON POST

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01314R000300380108-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 8, 2004
Sequence Number: 
108
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 1, 1970
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01314R000300380108-3.pdf133.05 KB
Body: 
TITF~ ZTf~aI~ t:s~~i'v?'3 /'T Approved For Release 20W(}f6 :6&-RDP8 By Joseph Goulden PIRG T. AGNEW, both before and after becoming Vice President, has been a man of -table-thumping emotions. Agnew is not a noted swearer- his occasional freshets of profanity lack the combinative ingenuity of Lyndon Johnson and the several Kennedys, and wouldn't cause -even a bishop to blush. No, Agnew is a direct person, one who shows anger with a spread-palmed ,y-, wwWHANIPPPppp on whatever flat ,surface. happens to be under hand. It is a healthy, arcliphysical venting that rids a man of anger and tension, and permits a swift return to tranquility, once the echo of the thunderclap dies away. Spirts Agnew's smack the morning of 'September 25, 1968, was a real hand- reddener. There he was, not even through the first paragraph of the lead editorial of his then favorite morning newspaper, the Washington Post, when he found the contumelious lines: "Given enough time, Nixon's decision ('I seriously considered more than a dozen able men') to name Agnew may come to be regarded as perhaps the most eccentric political appointment since the Roman Emperor Caligula named his horse a consul." Spiro Agnew was still howling-figura- tively, because men who slap desks can be" furious and calm simultaneously- three months later when he met Wash- ington Post ,publisher Katharine Meyer Graham at a dinner hosted by Niel Elfin, Washington bureau chief of her News- week magazine. "It really grated on him, you could tell," Mrs. Graham recollects now. "He must have referred to it ten times during the evening. I suppose it was a jolt to him, for this. was early in his exposure to national politics, and he wasn't used to this sort of criticism. He. kept repeating, `Comparing me to a horse. Really, that's getting pretty low.' A politician's wrath at a newspaper is normally one of Washington's more transient events, yet the Caligula's Horse Editorial-they pronounce it with capital letters at the Post-is relevant here for TAT 1 r:~I tamed assault ever upon the media by a Southwestern President calls wise-ass. national administration, with the Vice Organizational monstrosity though it President complaining of "the monopo- may be, with the frequent elbowwaish man- lization of the great public information ners of an oafish teenager, the Post does vehicles and the concentration of more have a distinctive personality. And it and more power over public opinion in' also faces the problem of writing for fewer and fewer hands." Spiro Agnew what executive editor Ben Bradlee calls veritably made the Washington Post a "100,000 policy makers and 100,000 poli- household word in the tank towns and cy players." restless suburbs of Silent iMajoritania? -Finally, the Post you read this morn- -Second, some highly responsible ex= ing was produced in an office which, in ecutives of the Post, Including Philip the past five years, has experienced a Geyelin, editor of the editorial page, complete turnover of editorial and news trace the Vice President's attacks right. direction. Power struggles-whether they 'back to Caligula's horse. Such an inter- occur in newspapers, in political parties, pretation, if valid, gives Agnew only shallow,' personalistic motivation for what amounts to a no-holds-barred con- frontation with the nation's press. It should be obvious to discerning Ameri- cans by now that Agnew is stalking heavier game; were he angry over one editorial, a letter to the man who wrote it-Ward Just, one hears at. the Post- would have been artillery enough. Yet the Vice President's now famed "Alont- gomery Speech" of November 20, 1969, in which he first attacked the Post and the New York Times, does contain a or in humdrum insurance of ices-pro- duce common results: changed proce- dures and philosophies of doing business; hurt feelings among the losers who are still around; a mixture of exhilaration and wariness among the winners. The Post's key news editors are now without ex- ception "Bradlee men," and Bradlee uses a recurring word when' he talks about .the Post. "Impact," he says, "I want to have some impact on this town and this country. I want to know they are read- ing us. Impact." peculiarly revealing sentence which sup- Bradlee's name is atop the editorial ports Geyelin's theory. "It is not an easy thing," Agnew said, "to wake up each morning to learn that some prominent man or institution has implied that you are a bigot, a racist, or a fool." -Third, the editorial's savage bite, couched in the bon 7motese of a George- town cocktail party, does much to ex- plain why few people in Washington are entirely neutral about the Washing- ton Post. Whether it is a superior news- paper is a question we shall . address. Suffice to say now that the Post's atti- masthead. Yet titles don't always equate with power. 1 called Ben Bagdikian two months after Bradlee made hire the Post's national editor. 1 asked, "Who makes the decisions at the Post? I-Vhy is it run like it is?" Bagdikian is an old acquaintance, and he has an ebullient Armenian humor- the sort which permits wen to speak the most heretical of truths through jest- and he replied, "If you find out, please let inc know." several. reasons. -1--j ....Y.,....., - ? -?- ? ??- L. i ne person wno controls the host, dealing with its friends. And the line is -First, of con a v 5,p~1 scent ownership of the t ~ 4hasev20P 1fl9/FdB~ ZhA~RQPIi}8 NM LRB003 f~C the Post has esca a c to t I e most su - o on Post Company, and has . tellectual calls sophisticated and a faded her name highest on the m asthead,