YOUTH BRIGADE MAY LOSE STATUS AS OSU STUDENT GROUP

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000400100003-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 22, 2004
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 17, 1979
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000400100003-7.pdf113.65 KB
Body: 
v c J < olv~ Sf~ Approved For Releas " S1/~J1 ] IRDP88-01315R000 O -27 17 February 1979 u Status', Yo th Brkade Z W T StU AT I As OSU Gen (3rrouffa By Carol Ann Lease OU Tfv Dhpatch Staff The Revolutionary Communist Youth Bri- gade no longer should be a student organization at Ohio State University, the Student Commission rec- ommended Friday after a hearing that got off toa stormy start in the,Ohio Union; Commission head Tami .Hockenberger recessed the hearing after brigade president Patricia Pres- tom said the organization would not plead to charges against it and /tried to read a statement calling the session a "lynching." SHE AND brigade trea- surer George Preston, who is. her husband, did not return when the hear- ing reconvened. They maintained it should have been postponed because brigade adviser John B. Quigley-Jr.. professor _ of law, was out of town. Following university," rules,. John Halstead, coordinator of judicial af- fairs, presented the uni- versity's case. without re- buttal. He, instituted.?pro- ceedings after. students`, faculty 'and . staff com= plained about a ' Jan..23 demonstration; sponsored by the brigade . during: which a CIA' recruiter`on campus was splattered`' with red paint After 90 minutes oi?- deliberations, the nine member commission found the brigade , guilty of violating a rule allow- ing students to meet with recruiters and two addi- tional rules prohibiting intentional threat: of or inflicting of bodily harm and intentional threat of or actual destruction of property. Students on the tcom- mission did not rule on lesser offenses of,, neglig- ence .leading to the possi- bility of inflicting bodily harm or destruction of property. FOLLOWING Hal- stead's recommendations, they said the brigade;. ' l ? Should be-: barred from being a student or- ganization, through. the -1979-80 academic year-,,. o Make restitution for interior damage to' Hitch- cock Hall where the-,inci- dent occurred, estimated during. the hearing at $30 to $40. ( . o Not be allowed to reorganize under another name. w Not be allowed to reregister after 1980 un- less it does pay-for the damage. JAMES TRAINER, busi- ness manager for student organizations, testified during the hearing that .the brigade has spent the $238 it got from the uni- versity this academic year and shows no money in its accounts. Actual sanctions will be imposed' by Richard A. Hollingsworth, director of student organizations and community life.The -brie gade can appeal both the convictions - toUniversi- ty Court - and any, san- cions imposed ? to Hol- lingsworth ;-' within 10 days of being notified. ' of them. University estimates of $225. worth;:. of .? damage included sand blasting the exterior of Hitchcock Hall to ;remove a statement, "U.S. Out of Iran CIA Off Campus," painted on the building sometime during the night after the dernonstration,.it was re vealed at the hearing. pre-planned. Preston has maintained the brigade did not know anyone was going to throw paint. Witnesses, -including staff and -students from the College of Engineer, ing,where the CIA recrui- ter:was interviewing, tes- tif ied that representatives of the'news media showed up immediately after the incident even though they did not call them and that Preston came in earlier in { the day asking to see the l CIA recruiter, presuma-1 biy so he could identify, 'aer for the 15 -persons] who appeared later for ' the demonstration. Miss Hockenberger said the commission also was influenced by the fact that brigade members' distrib- uted leaflets outside the building after the incident and later acknowledged . responsibility for it in THE...LEAFLETTS dis- tributed.. the day of the I demonstration did not say anything about paint. Hal. stead was unable to iden-' tify the person who threw the paint or prove he or she was a member of the' brigade. Preston of 189 W. Pat- terson Ave. and Paul Hol- li?ter of 2267 Indianola Ave. have each been charged with complicity to perform criminal mis- chief. Witnesses said.Hol- lister read a statement just before the paint. was thrown. They both have pleaded' innocent, the cases have been consolidated, and a hearing on the- misde. meanor charge is sched- uled for March 9.: A y ' THE KEY point by Hal- stead . was that the paint-~ throwing incident.,was Approved For Release 2004/11/01 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400100003-7