TIME SPIES IN THE SKY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000400360042-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 8, 2004
Sequence Number: 
42
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 30, 1979
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000400360042-6.pdf154.54 KB
Body: 
Approved For Rele se 95 12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400360042-6 Spies _the Sky Thefate of SALT II may depend on "verification" ill the U.S. be able to catch the So- UN viets if they cheat under the SALT II treaty'? The answer may determine the fate of the arms ?imitation accord in the Senate. As the Foreign Relations Com- mittee ended its second week of hearings on the pact, Delaware Democrat Joseph Biden said last week: "Verification is go- ing to be the cutting issue of the com- mittee's vote on the treaty and ultimately on the Senate floor." What has made verification so con- troversial was the loss early this year of two important CIA listening posts in Iran, close to the U.S.S.R. border. From these sites, U.S. computers and other electronic devices in tandem with spy satellites had been able to monitor most Soviet missile test-firings and hence learn, among other things, the weapons' length, diameter and launchweight. This is precisely the kind of information that will be essential for de- termining whether Moscow abides by a crucial SALT II restriction: increasing or decreasing key characteristics of an ex- isting intercontinental ballistic missile by more than 5% would classify that ICBM as a "new missile." SALT II allows each side only one "new" ICBM. Despite the loss of the Iranian sites, the Administration insists that the U.S. can adequately verify the arms pact. At last week's hearings, Defense Secretary Harold Brown emphasized that U.S. spy satellites and other means of gathering in- telligence keep close tabs on the devel- opment, testing and deployment of all So- viet strategic arms. He even claimed that every new Soviet ICBM is detected while still on the Kremlin's drawing boards, presumably a rare public allusion to U.S. cloak-and-dagger activities inside the U.S.S.R. Pointing out that development of a new missile system takes about a dec- ade and requires some 20 to 30 test flights, Brown said: "It i:, Inconceivable to me that the Soviets cot.xid develop, produce, test and deploy a :)ew ICBM in a way that would evade t~~s monitoring network." (Even as Brow?r was discussing Soviet testing, the deadly U.S. air-launched cruise missile was beginning a crucial phase of development. See SCIENCE.) B rown's assurances did not satisfy Sen- ator John Glenn, the Ohio Democrat who has devoted hundreds of hours to studying the complex verification issue. As a former astronaut with some first- hand knowledge of how highly sophis- ticated electronic devices work-or fail -Glenn is looked to for guidance on verification by man of his Senate col- leaguesApja r1FactRe8aSe 2QQ6 to vote for SALT, but I want to know that the Soviets are living up to it." He believes that the loss of the Iranian posts left the U.S. with no way of sufficiently monitoring Soviet missile testing. He fears that the U.S. will have more trouble in- tercepting Soviet telemetry, the perfor- mance data beamed back to earth by the test missile. Noted Glenn: "Brown tends to minimize the importance of te- lemetry, while analysts say that telemetry is key." To allay his doubts, Glenn is con- sidering proposing three reservations to be attached to the Senate bill approving the arms pact. One would urge Moscow not to encrypt any of its telemetry. The second would require the Administration to inform Congress whenever it brought complaints about possible Soviet cheating to the Standing Consultative Commission, Still worried about Russian cheating. a U.S.-Soviet body that deals with charges of treaty violations. Because nei- ther of these reservations would be bind- ing on Moscow, they probably would not require new negotiations with the Kremlin. That almost certainly would not be the case with Glenn's third reservation: a requirement that Moscow give advance notice of all its ICBM tests. The U.S. al- ready gives notice, primarily because American test missiles fly over interna- tional waters. Advance Soviet notice, ar- gued Glenn, would enable the Pentagon to get the maximum number of satellites, planes and ships in place to monitor the Soviet tests, thus significantly compensat- ing for the capabilities lost in Iran. But it is very likely, according to State Depart- ment aides, that Moscow would balk at Gle", wan 5A W%fthm-64 ment that SALT advocates fear may doom the treaty. ^ 360042-6