TRYING TO SOOTHE SALT'S CRITICS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000400400026-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 9, 2004
Sequence Number: 
26
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 13, 1978
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000400400026-9.pdf135.26 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R0004004 1.. S 4 L7- ARTICLE APP,.4RED ON PAGE 2 TIM1;. 13 March 1978 Trying to Soothe ALT'S Critics The Administration claims the Soviets are playingfair R 4 e have had five years of moni- If Loring Soviet compliance with the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, and { the record to date has been generally good." So insisted a U.S. arms-control ex- pert last week as the Carter Admin- istration stepped up its efforts to soften opposition in Congress to a new SALT treaty. The old pact expired in October, but the U.S. and Soviet Union have agreed to continue abiding by it while negoti= ators in Geneva bargain on a SALT 11 treaty. If they reach an accord, it will have to be ratified by the Senate .before tak- ing effect. But fears persist on Capitol Hill that the Soviets have underhandedly violated the old SALT agreement and can- not be trusted to keep a new one. In- deed, former Defense Secretary Melvin Laird accused Moscow of exactly that in. a recent article in the Reader's Digest titled, Arms Control: The Russians Are Cheating! In an 18-page report given to the Sen- ate Foreign Relations Committee last week, Secretary of State Cyrus Vance ad- mits that the Soviets have taken full ad- vantage of loopholes in the old treaty and operated at its uppermost limits. None- theless, the report concludes that Moscow has not committed any clear-cut viola- tions Of SALT I. The report is based largely on the supersecret proceedings of the Standing Consultative Commission in Geneva, which is a joint U.S.-Soviet grievance board for monitoring SALT I, and the National Security Council's Verification Panel. By making the information pub- lic, the Administration sought to refute Laird's charges, . as well as those made by other SALT opponents. The chief points: - In 1973, the U.S. suspected (presumably on evidence from spy satellites) that the Soviets were violating the treaty by build- ing new missile silos. When challenged, the Russians explained that the instal- lations were actually new bunkers for mis- sile technicians and thus not prohibited. According to the report, further inves- tigation by U.S. intelligence sources de- report is a real whitewash. We intend to termined that the Soviets were telling the truth. - In 1973 and 1974, the U.S. spotted the Soviets using an antiaircraft radar system to track one of their own mis- siles in flight. The U.S. questioned wheth- er the Soviets were illegally converting antiaircraft defenses into an antiballistic missile system. But the Soviets maintained go over it line by line." The debate over SALT was heated up even more last week by new evidence of possible Soviet transgressions, ones the Vance report does not. address. According to some Defense Department analysts, Moscow is operating 64 ballistic-missile submarines-two more than the ceiling set by SALT I. Other U.S. analysts argue that they were using the radar only to i that . because the two extra. subs have test the rocket's navigation system. Still, not yet been sent out on patrol, the So- notes the report, the radar activity ceased viets have not exceeded the limit. More- "a short time later." over, three additional new Soviet Delta- I,- In 1974, the U.S. thought that the So- class missile subs have been. rigged and viets might be breaking the treaty by tak- ing steps, not spelled out in the report, that could enable them eventually to con- are ready for sea trials, but they also have not been used on patrols. Thus, I says a US. Navy intelligence officer, ceal installations from U.S. spy satellites. "right now it is official judgment that no When the U.S. complained, the Soviets . hard evidence of Soviet violations exists. stopped the activities. though we do agree that they are push- . In 1975, the Soviets began deploying ing right out to the edges." monster SS-18 super-rockets, which can carry as many as eight independently tar- getable warheads, despite a treaty pro- vision that forbids the converting of land- based "light" ICBM launchers into vehicles for "heavy" ones. But since SALT I does not define "light" and "heavy," the Ad- ministration decided that there was no violation. The report promises that this loophole will be closed in SALT U. The report also discloses that the So- viets questioned whether the U.S. was vi- olating SALT I on five occasions, though all of the queries were later withdrawn. In one case, the Russians objected to tem- porary shelters used to protect U.S. Min- uteman missile silos from rain and snow while they were being rebuilt, beginning in 1973. After the U.S. reduced the size of the shelters by half, the Soviets dropped the matter. Senate supporters of SALT predictably praised the report. Said Democrat John Culver of Iowa: "It should lay to rest at- tempts to undermine arms-limitation ef- forts." Added Democrat Gary Hart of Colorado: "Tile U.S. has been vigilant." But opponents, who are led by Wash- ington Senator Scoop Jackson, were far from satisfied. Said an aide to one prom- inent Senate skeptic: "The compliance At the same time, as the Administration was trying to soothe U.S. critics of SALT, President Carter was warning the Soviets that their military intervention in Ethiopia was straining relations with the U.S. and jeopardizing SALT It's chanc- es. He carefully noted that. the Admin- istration was not linking the war in the Horn of Africa with the arms-limitation talks. But, he added, Soviet actions could "lessen the confidence of the American people in the ... peaceful intentions of the Soviet Union." Carter's point: alarm in the Senate over Soviet intervention in the war between Ethiopia and. Somalia might cause any SALT treaty to be re- jected. In short, only the Russians. can keep SALT 11 from getting caught be- tween the Horn and the Hill. a Approved For Release 2005/01/12 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400400026-9