THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL A TARGET OF THE CIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 9, 2004
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 17, 1977
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0.pdf989.77 KB
Body: 
/7 J 1oU 77 r $ , tsar it i~ wra-r~uroo-u i~ i~r~uuugvu~+auup CIA c~ Yo uN'A The Fourth International a Target of the By David Frankel Maker and breaker of governments, sponsor of private armies, source of the most sophisticated instruments of torture and of the most sensitive electronic surveil- lance devices, the Central Intelligence Agency pollutes the political life of six continents. Now, the CIA has been forced to hand over hundreds of documents on its secret operations around the world to the Social- ist Workers party (SWP) and Young Socialist Alliance (YSA), The CIA docu- ments were made public as a result of a suit initiated by the SWP and YSA against the U.S. government's illegal surveillance and harassment of dissident individuals and organizations. The SWP and YSA are .demanding an injunction against further government abuses and $40 million in damages. Only a tiny portion of the CIA's massive file on the world Trotskyist movement has been released so far. Adopting the same method employed by Richard Nixon to hide the truth from the masses of people, the CIA insists that release of many of its files would endanger "national security." Even those that have been turned over to the SWP and YSA have been heavily censored. Nevertheless, what emerges from the documents is a vast campaign to disrupt and destroy the Fourth Interna- tional. Further information has been obtained through the sworn statements of CIA officials. Acting under court order, a number of CIA officials, including CIA Director George Bush, have been forced to answer questions about some of the activities of the agency in regard to the SWP and YSA. According to this sworn testimony: ? CIA burglars carried out break-ifs directed against SWP and YSA members travelling abroad. These operations, deli- cately labeled "surreptitious entry" by Bush, are illegal by whatever name they are called. With this in mind, .the CIA has refused to name the countries where the burglaries took place or say when they occurred. Perhaps the agency 'hopes to save embarrassment for friendly govern- ments and police forces that may have cooperated with ? it in breaking their own laws. ? Electronic surveillance was used against SWP and YSA members travelling; abroad. Most countries have laws against this type bf activity, and again, the CIA has declined to say when and where it used' this technique to gather information. ? A mail cover was maintained on some correspondence to and from the American Trotskyists. This. included the opening and copying of letters, in clear violation of the law. ? Information on the SWP and YSA was obtained by the CIA through the use of informers. ? Although it refused to supply any information about the countries involved, the type of information sought or obtained, and what was done with this information, the CIA did admit that information on the SWP and YSA was both given to and received from foreign governments. ? Finally, the agency admitted that it "has engaged in the collection of informa- tion concerning the Fourth International." It refused to say what type of information on the Fourth International was obtained, how it was obtained, or when it was obtained. However, the general approach of the CIA was outlined by one official, Paul F. Ilaefner. Interrogated-by lawyers for the SWP and YSA, Haefner at first refused to answer the question: "was the overseas office [of the CIA] limited in any manner in the methods it was to pursue?" In November--five months after the original interview-the government had second thoughts and decided to submit an answer to the question. A sworn affidavit from Haefner explained that "the senior CIA officer in any country abroad is always obligated to use his best judgment love w~p~~ as to whether specific operational actions or methods can be initiated and carried out securely, without adverse problems for either the host country government or the United States Government and consistent with the authority given to the CIA by law." In other words, it is up to the official in charge of each CIA office to keep his operations secret and to avoid any embar- rassing scandals. As for the injunction that CIA actions must be "consistent with the authority given to the CIA by law," this would be laughable if the reality was riot so grim. The CIA, after all, plotted to assassinate the heads of at least five foreign govern- ments, and when the truth about these operations finally came to light the U.S. attorney general ruled that no American laws had been broken. The French Connection For a closer look at the' CIA's war against democratic rights, it is necessary Jo turn to the documents obtained by the SWP and YSA through their suit. In CIA jargon, these documents have been "sanitized"-that is, they have been cen-, sored in order to remove all traces of the agency's illegal conspiracies against the exercise of democratic rights. around the world. Paragraph after paragraph in the docu- ments released by the CIA is blanked out and marked "classified information per- taining to intelligence sources and meth- ods," "classified matter," "administrative matter," "CIA internal organizational data," or "material not related to subject," But virtually all of the CIA's activities are directed against the democratic rights of the working people around the world. Thus, not even the heavy hand of the CIA censor was able to totally erase the damaging material in these files. One thing that coin es through clearly in the CIA documents is the complicity of other governments in CIA activities. The CIA demands its actions be kept secret, from the masses of working people both inside and outside the United States,. but its burglaries, wiretaps, and agents are well known to the governments allied with American imperialism around the world- including, of course, the imperialist democ- racies in Europe. The cordial relations between the CIA and the French secret police, for example, are indicated in a number of documents. A Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R00040O450001rcont/nentat Press March 1969 document cAl31xd)mW Par- Rel'@ewi-w2OftOWiISfr1Au[ D 1t315R0`ONOO (1? O~~SOpurposc of suppress' muniste Internationalists, at that time the the heading "information provided by a ing politics assent is provided by a French section of the Fourth-International, foreign government." telegram in the CIA files. Dated November is almost completely censored. In three of It is also clear that the CIA returned the 1972, the telegram is from the American the memorandum's seven parts, material favors of friendly political police organiza- consul in Martinique. is deleted on the basis that it is "Classified tions elsewhere in the world. One CIA file "French authorit.ies," it says, "are expeli- information ... and information provided on the Ad Hoe Committee to Support ing two Anncit [American citizen) members by a foreign government with the French Workers and Students said: of the National Committee of the Socialist understanding it would be held in confi- "Subject organization is a coalition of Workers Party for engaging in political dence." several U.S. organizations which demon- activities in Martinique." Material in a March 1975 document strated in June 1968 in support of striking Did American authorities protest this dealing with the Trotskyist movement in French workers and students in protest of infringement of democratic rights? Did France is also deleted, since, according to the French government's ban on public they ask for an explanation of why the CIA censor, it was "information demonstrations, radical organizations, American socialists were being forbidden provided by a foreign government." A and the arrest of political activists." to meet with advocates of independence f'r document dated January 1972 advises CIA The demonstrations, the memorandum the French colony? offices that "Available in the CIA Docu- notes, "were peaceful and orderly" with No, the U.S. consul was too busy helping ment and Pictorial Services Division is a only one exception. (Police in Berkeley, the French police. The telegram explains: seven-page review, in French, of the California, attacked and tried to break up "For purposes hearing, local French au- activities of a Trotskyite organization, the a peaceful demonstration.) thorities request info about possible sub- C'ynimunist League, in factories and other Peaceful protests, however, were appar- versive activities in which Thomas and business enterprises." ently considered subversive by the CIA. Washington [the. two SWP members) may In addition to receiving reports from The memorandum included a breakdown have previously engaged including any French police agents on the trade-union of the U.S. demonstrations by city, along involving illegal black power groups. and political activities of the French with identified sponsors and demonstra- Information may either be unclassified or, Trotskyists, there are indications that the tors. Additional censored material ap-- if appropriate, handed over to French CIA had its own agents at work collecting posted with each name and organization. authorities by consulate in confidence." information. An April 1973 report on the Can there be any doubt that a report was Unfortunately for the image of French "rule of the Trotskyist Communist League dispatched to the appropriate French democracy, Thomas and Washington had in organizing student demonstrations; police agency? not been engaging in any illegal activities, tactics of French labor with regard to Another example of the collaboration either in the United States or in Marti- students," is censored under the heading of between the French and the American pique. The colonial regime had to expel An Appeal for International Solidarity (The following appeal for international support was issued January 12 by the Political Rights Defense Fund. Initial signers of the statement include Nobel IAtureate-Linus Pauling, linguist Noam Chomsky, feminist Gloria Steinem, and antiwar activist Philip Berrigan. [Those wishing to add their names to this list should send a signed statement to that effect to: Political Rights Defense Fund, Box 649 Cooper Station, New York, N.Y. 10003. Donations for legal expenses can be sent to the same ad- dress.] For decades the U.S government has systematically violated the democratic rights of people around the world. ? Through its agents, the U.S govern- ment has subjected its political oppo- nents to spying, harassment, burglaries, and assassination plots. ? U.S. agents have infiltrated labor unions, including the teachers and elec- trical wo-kers unions in the United States, set up phony, CIA-backed union federations and labor publications, and disrupted genuine attempts to organize workers for their own benefit. U.S. agents have also attempted to entrap unionists and other progressives through the use of agents provocateurs. ? U.S. agents have attempted to sub- vert the principle of freedom of the press by bribing newspaper editors and repor- ters and by planting doctored articles in the world press. ? The U.S government has aided some of the world's most vicious dictatorial regimes in the task of holding down and victimizing those struggling for demo- cratic rights and progressive social change. ? U.S. agents have violated the laws of countries throughout the world, often with the complicity of local officials. When the CIA has been unable to buy governments, it has often attempted to bring about their overthrow. A number of the disclosures about Washington's operations abroad have resulted from the lawsuit brought by the Socialist Workers party of the United States and the Young Socialist Alliance against the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Security Agency, Military Intel- ligence, and other U.S. secret police and spy. agencies. The suit, despite the efforts of these agencies, promises to produce many further disclosures that can help to curtail their activities. The suit demands that the U.S. courts forbid the govern- ment from spying on and attempting to disrupt the . SWP, the YSA, and the Fourth International anywhere in the world. The information produced by this suit is of immense value to advocates of social justice around the world. It will help to expose the crimes of the U.S government and its fellow conspirators. in other countries. Victories in the laws suit can open up opportunities for further actions against CIA crimes. Therefore, we the undersigned endorse the efforts of the Political Rights Defense Fund, a nonpartisan civil liberties orga- nization set up to raise funds for the suit brought by the SWP and YSA and to publicize the issues-the suit raises. This endorsement does not necessarily imply political agreement with the political views of the SWP, the YSA, or the Fourth International. But it is a recognition of the importance of the fight being con- ducted by these organizations against activities of the U.S. government that pose a grave danger to the rights of us all. January 17, 1977 Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0 them simply for attending. a political in 1967 directed against domestic which received 25 Oct, will not raise mee'*Ing. And in fact, I ~i~t d 46-F Iea*ts26N7Oallf3 VAt I iDi3 P5R00 045E 61A source) for any follow the two socialists a a mg, e Frenc a suggestive name o peration up action t is case. However, will pass on authorities violated their own laws. Chaos." . any info which (CIA source) may volunteer Of course, the CIA did not confine its so- In this regard, it is worth quoting an. on subject to headquarters and (foreign called counterintelligence activities April 13, 1971, cable to an overseas CIA city). (Administrative matter) (Administra- against the Trotskyist movement to station: tive matter)." France. The documents turned over to the What type' of "follow up action" was SWP and YSA so far deal with about 1. (censored] 24 April demonstrations are rejected in this case-and not rejected in being sponsored by the National Peace Action -twenty countries. Coalition (NPAC), which is dominated by others? How much "info" was passed on to It was apparently standard procedure Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party (SWP), the Franco's fascist police? Were communica- for the CIA and the Federal Bureau of SWP's youth organization Young Socialist Al- tions with the Franco regime's repressive, Investigation to cooperate in monitoring liance (YSA), and the YSA influenced Student apparatus considered "administrative mat- forms labeled "FBI Liaison" in the CIA Vietnam.... files contain travel plans of SWP leaders- 2. Only SWP member recently in your area, including vacation plans. Sometimes the best IiQs knowledge, is Peter Camejo [censored) FBI requested the CIA to spy on socialists 3. [three censored lines] action [censored]. travelling abroad. In other cases, the CIA What was the local CIA office supposed acted on its own. to do about; the `only SWP member Antiwar Movement a CIA Target What was the CIA so interested in? To begin with, the movement against the war in. Vietnam was a prime target of the CIA spies. The CIA maintained files on all leaders of the American antiwar move- ment. For example, a number of SWP leaders are listed in documents headed "National Mobilization Committee Person- alities." (This was the name of one of the American antiwar coalitions.) One such document, dated 'March 6, 1969, reports that "Barry SHEPPARD, Editor of 'The Militant', visited Saigon, Tokyo, and several Western European countries for the announced purpose of reaching GI's in Vietnam and at bases around the world with the anti-war pro- gram of the SWP." Another document shows that a CIA informer attended the World Assembly for Peace,. held in France in 1972, and made a detailed report on the events there and the persons involved. A 1973 CIA report on the Fourth International said: Although tactics and activities vary from country to country, depending on local condi- tions, the international organization is capable of coordinating activities of its, member sections to provide greater impact on world opinion. Prior to the planned [antiwar] marches on Washington and San Francisco in April 1971 by the Socialist Workers Party (the American section of the United Secretariat), the International Executive Committee sent letters urging groups throughout the world to demonstrate their solidarity with the anti-war movement in the United States.* Subversive action indeed! 'Operation Chaos' There are indications that the CIA did not simply stand by and observe the development of the antiwar movement. ,Under the direction of Lyndon B. Johnson, it began a "counterintelligence" program recently in your area"? What type of "action"-a word that was apparently left in the document inadvertently-was sug- gested? These are the type of questions that the SWP and YSA will be bringing up as their suit proceeds. As part of Operation Chaos, the CIA spied on the activities of American Trots kyists in Mexico,: Argentina, and Chile. For instance? Linda Jenness, the SWP's 1972 presidential candidate, came under surveillance when she travelled to. Chile during that election campaign. "Believe it very possible that American Trotskyists may travel to Mexico (classi- fied matter)," a February 1972 document says. It continues: "Would appreciate receiving any info (classified matter) Peruvian Mission but were unable to do concerning such travels/contacts. Suggest so." Also listed is an April 1967 news that likely candidates are: Joe HANSEN, release "calling for amnesty for all politi- Barry SHEPPARD, Jack BARNES, and cal prisoners in Bolivia. It requested that possibly (information does not pertain to letters and telegrams be sent to the subjects) (classified matter)." President of Bolivia asking for better The CIA was also interested in events in treatment of political prisoners," Spain, as a September 1975 report titled Especially upsetting to the CIA was the "Tension Over Basque Death Sentences first issue of the USIA Reporter. "The Mounts in Spain" indicates. An October intended purpose of the bulletin was to 1972 document 'on Spain, labeled "Eyes disseminate information, as complete as only (CIA employee) (Sensitivity indicator possible, relating to all political prisoners .`! Operation Chaos),'." reports: in Latin America and to activities of the "On 13 Oct 72, per Ref A suggestion, USLAJC." (CIA source) was alerted to the arrival of The CIA documents turned over to the Peter Camejo (classified matter) in Barcel- SWP and YSA deal with at least eleven ona 'possibly to contact Spanish Trotsky- Latin American countries, but by far the ist leaders' there.'(CIA source) was asked most extensive coverage was devoted to to keep us informed on subject's activities Bolivia during the period of 1965-68. there." During this period the dictatorship of Gen. After recording information obtained Rene Barrientoe, which was closely tied to from this CIA informer, the memorandum Washington, had to contend with intense says, "In line with Ref B instructions social unrest among the Bolivian masses. 1-f h 1 th B . us ow International; reactionary legislation passed in 1940 forced the American Trotskyists to sever ters"? A Helping Hand In Bolivia Latin Americ, is another area that the CIA pays particular attention to. SWP leaders Joseph Hansen and George No- vack, for example, are both singled out because of their role in aiding the defense of Latin American political prisoners. A September 1968 CIA memorandum credits Novack and Hansen with initiating the U.S. Committee for Justice to Latin American Political Prisoners (USLA, or USLAJC in CIA parlance). "It was orga- nized in late 1966 in order to seek amnesty for Hugo BLANCO, a Peruvian revolution- ary fighter, and to combat the arrests of revolutionaries of Latin America," the CIA memorandum states. Among the subversive activities carried out by USLA, the CIA report says, was a November 1966 picket line where "demon- strators tried to present petitions request- ing clemency for Hugo BLANCO to the c ose a arrientos regime was to. American imperialism was indicat- ed when Antonio Arguedas Mendieta held a news conference in L P i A t a az n ugus formal ties with their international cothinkers. 1968. "Until one month ago," the New Second, the April 24, r 1971, antiwar York Times reported August 25, 1968, demonstrations--which drew 500,000 persons in "Arguedas was Bolivia's Minister of Gov- Washington, D.C., alone-were not SWP opera- tions, although the SWP participated in them ernment, one of the highest Cabinet and helped to build them. They were sponsored offices, which combines the functions of *Two lies should be noted in this CIA statement, by a broad coalition that included members of Interior Minister, Chief of Police and Chief First, the SWP is not a section of the Fourth Congress. of Intelligence." Approved., For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0 Disillusioned by the role of the CIA in his country, Argued pppio td Fl?tI flea beans. "The declarations he made, if true, would indicate that the Bolivian Govern- ment for the past three years has been little more than a mouthpiece for the United States, notably the C.I.A.," the Times article noted. (For a full account of Arguedas' charges, see Intercontinental Press, September 23, 1968, p. 770.) The CIA's solicitude for the I3arrientos regime was indicated in an April 1966 document on the "plans of the Bolivian Trotskyist party for May Day." It reported: The political bureau of the Bolivian Trotskyist party (POR) met with the La Paz regional committee of the POIt in La Paz on 18 April 1966 to formulate a program for the I May 1966 celebrations. Those in attendance were [names listed]. At the meeting it was revealed that the Bolivian Workers Central (COIB) and the Democratic Council of the People (CDP) planned to arrange a parade and other demonstrations for 1 May. In support of the COB and CDP effort, it was decided that the 1'OR would do the following: A. Publish a special issue of Masse (the POR newspaper]. 1'. Publish a manifesto addressed to the .Itohvian workers and people. C. Mobilize the entire POR for the May Day parade. - D. Publish and distribute 100,000 hand bills commemorating May Day. E. In collaboration with other political groups belonging to the CDP, undertake demonstrations against the military junta and organize defen- sive shock forces to counter any governmental offensive against them. Following this report, an entire page is devoted to unspecified "organizational data," according- to the CIA censor. In light of the context, it is hard to avoid the coadusion that the CIA was helping the dictatorship to organize the repression of the 1-olivian people. Covering Up the Crimes According to its charter, the CIA is supposed to operate only outside of the United States. But, as Watergate showed, it is impossible to resort to terrorism and repression abroad without importing the same methods into'the internal life of the country responsible for their use. Ci,: operations inside the United States carne to light as a result of the Watergate investigation. The news was too hot to sit on. and on December 22, 1974, the New York Times reported that "according to well-placed Government sources," the CIA "conducted. a massive, illegal domestic intelligence operation during the Nixon Administration against the antiwar move- nient and other dissident groups in the United States...." In are attempt to prevent the American people from learning the full extent of the CIA's crimes, the Ford administration appointed a "blue-ribbon" commission to 'investigate and report on the agency's activities. Nelson Rockefeller, the head of the most prominent ruling-class family in the United States, who as governor of New York ordered the Attica Prison massacre, was chosen to preside over the whitewash. "`T`here are things which have been done which are in contradiction to the statutes," Rockefeller concluded after five months of study, "but in comparison to the total effort they are not major." Even Senator Frank Church called the Rockefeller Commission report "the tip of the iceberg." In a June 11, 1975, editorial, the New York Times called the CIA operation in the United States that of "an embryonic police state." The ruling class, however, decided to try to choke off further revelations. President Ford, one White House aide explained, considered investigation of CIA assassina- tion plots "basically an historic exercise." Material on such plots was deleted from the Rockefeller report. An overwhelming majority of the House of Representatives endorsed Ford's cover- up in January 1976, when they voted to keep key sections of a House investigation secret. When CBS News correspondent Daniel Schorr obtained a copy of the report and made it available for publication, he was threatened with a citation for con- tempt of Congress. A more subtle approach was taken by the Senate, which issued its own heavily censored report in April. Although the Senate report produced little new material on the CIA, it promised an end to the agency's abuses through the establish- ment of a congressional oversight commit- tee. But the CIA documents that have come out as a result of the SWP and YSA suit prove that the Senate investigation headed Peters/Dayton Daily News by Frank Church was as much a cover-up as its predecessors. Government commit- tees, for example, insisted that CIA spying in the United States began in 1967. In fact, the CIA files include material on the SWP going back to 1949. "According to a report dated 7 February 1951," one CIA memorandum says, "Frank LOVELL, member of the National Committee of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), charged that American interven- tion in Korea was a 'most brazen act c; imperialism."' CIA surveillance inside the Unite, States picked up during the late 1950s an-.-', early 1960s. The CIA files contain report.. on the YSA from New York, Berkeley, ant; Boston in this period. The CIA's Boston field office filed a report in 1961 on a rallo held to protest the murder of Congolc&, leader Patrice Lumumbn. Later CIA reports on the YSA came from Utah. San Francisco, and Washington: D.C. Another facet of the cover-up is that net one of the official investigations of thi CIA ever mentioned the fact that the agency was systematically spying on Anicrican citizens travelling abroad. This abuse was also uncovered by the SWP and YSA suit. Finally, the Rockefeller 'Commission reported that the CIA stopped keeping files on legal political activities of American citizens in March 1974, when Operation Chaos was ended. But the CIA itself listed one cable to an unnamed overseas station dated November 20, 1974-eight months after the supposed March cutoff date-in its dossier on Peter Camejo. The CIA refused to release the cable on the grounds January 17, 1977 Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0 that it is "based on a request of a foreign tional relationship with thi Iii 1 ' atie r I '0t r the United States in curbing intelligence service.Approved For Releasfh-211105/0111' s1~ aW5 ,j4 .00 ,4 TiV and in protecting its allies CIA spying inside the United States also continued after March 1974. A document dated May 3, 1974, said: "[Censored] Scheduled attend private filming of docu- mentary on life Trotsky on 28 April in New York. SWP old timers George Novak (sic) [censored] also scheduled be present. Provided [censored] some general topics for discussion with SWPers if opportunity presented." The CIA admits that it is continuing to collect information on the American Trot- skyist movement, claiming that this is "incidental" to, or a "by-product" of, its operations against the Fourth Internation- al abroad. As former CIA Director William Colby explained in January 1976, the end of Operation Chaos "doesn't mean the end of all counter-intelligence." Trolskylsts `Targets of Opportunity' Surmising up the activities of the SWP, a 1964 CIA document commented: The SWP, in order to escape from its restrictive isolation, promotes or penetrates organizations which are likely to arouse some part of the population. Causes taken up by the SWP in this way are the Cuban question (through the Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) and the Committee for Travel to Cuba), the integration problem, civil liberties in general, and labor problems... . As the anonymous CIA commentator saw it, "The SWP is calculated .to inflame primarily the unbalanced, the dissatisfied, the desperate, and those who do not care. In special circumstances the SWP might well create, or stimulate, serious prob- lems." The CIA, like the FBI, has gone to extraordinary lengths in searching for actions by the SWP and the YSA that could be interpreted as justifiable reasons for filing criminal charges against the two organizations. The agency's concern was reflected in a 1956 CIA document reporting that the SWP "actually ran candidates for the Presidency and Vice-Presidency in the 1956 elections." But supporting civil liberties, inflaming the dissatisfied, and running candidates in elections are not crimes in the eyes of the American people. The CIA has tried to get around this fact by smearing the Fourth International as a whole as a terrorist organization. The SWP's contacts with the Fourth international, it argues, justifies the continuing surveillance. Following the reunification of the Fourth International in.Juno 1963, the CIA stated in a memorandum, "We are presently endeavoring to increase our coverage of Fl activities throughout the world." Referring to a person who was in attendance at the Ninth World Congress of the Fourth International, a September 1969 dispatch said, "information indicat- ing that (foreign city) has had an opera- relationship is worth reviewing with an from revolutionary violence and internal subver. eye to possible re-establishment...." sion. CIA officials refused to answer when Let's examine this tissue of lies more asked by lawyers for the SWI' and closely. First, the CIA claims that the LYNDON JOHNSON: He was responsible for 'Operation Chaos:' YSA: "Are ,you aware of any cases in connection with Operation Chaos in which the overseas offices of the CIA attempted to disrupt activities of the Fourth Interna- ti.onal?" however, a November 1973 report on "the status'of the international Trotskyist movement" noted: "While operations against Trotskyist organizations am not of high priority; we encourage field station attention to targets of opportunity in this field." 'A Threat to, the National Interest' During the course of the court proceed- ings, the CIA submitted a statement in defense of its attempts to disrupt the Fourth International. According to this. statement: The Fourth International is a revolutionary Trotskyist organization which has supported international terrorist movements and whose constituent sections, such as that in Argentina, have engaged in notorious acts of murder and kidnaping to achieve their ends. Furthermore, the Fourth international has taken part in revolutionary violence to overthrow democratic governments such as its. admitted role in the Paris riots of May and June 1968 and has supported guerrilla warfare in Latin America against governments friendly to the United States. Finally, the Fourth International has assisted Communist regimes hostile to the United States in worldwide propaganda cam- paigns against the United States and its allies. Thus, the Fourth International is a threat to the Fourth International "has supported inter- national terrorist movements" and that its sections "have engaged in notorious acts of murder and kidnaping. . , ." First to he noted in this charge is the hypocrisy of the agency making it. The CIA's assassination plots against heads of state have made headlines around the world. And the CIA was also responsible for the "Phoenix" program in Vietnam, under which some 20,000 persons were murdered because of their political views. Doesn't this qualify as. "notorious acts of murder and kidnaping"? It is noteworthy that Argentina is the only place named by the cloak-and-dagger agency in its claim that the Fourth International supports terrorism. Appar- ently, they are referring to the Ejercito Revolucionario del Pueblo (ERP- Revolutionary People's Army). But the ERP never claimed: to be a Trotskyist organization, despite the fact that the capitalist press chose to identify it that way at various times. Nor was the ERP associated with the Fourth International. In fact, the Partido Revolucionario de Jos Trabajadores ' (PRT-Revolutionary Workers party), which sponsored the ERP, broke with the Fourth International and asked the world press to stop calling it "Trotskyist," since it was not Trotskyist. The CIA, of course, was well aware of this fact. One of the documents turned over to the SWP and YSA was a report on the news conference at which PRT leader Roberto Santucho announced his break with the Fourth International. . Mandel's Answer to 'Terrorist' Smear The CIA's attempt to equate revolution- ary socialism with terrorism is hardly an original device. Similar smears-often planted by the CIA-have been appearing in the world press-for years. In 1972, for example, Newsweek magazine ran - an article labeling the Fourth International as a "terrorist international." Ernest Mandel, the Belgian Trotskyist leader, answered the smear at the time, although Newsweek declined to print his letter. The Fourth International, Mandel said, "is not a terrorist organization but has always rejected the philosophy and methods of terrorism, opposed to the Marxist principles it stands for.' . we do not fight by means of dynamite, bombs, or the like." Taking up the intent behind. the smear, Mandel said: "Nobody should be surprised that terrorists who happen to wield state power and, in that position, pursue their political goals by murdering thousands of innocent people ... call their opponents & Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-dntercontinentai Press criminal terrorists.' The political function the American Declaration of ludepen- It is in this context that the CIA's final of this linguistic triclAppraved 9FyonrReIelaSe,2AOi5ibai8l3retCil PB8AQ i 15R?fl 4SWOV Lnt against thy: Fourtli facilitate and justify in advance mass repression, mass persecution, mass torture and, if necessary, mass killing of political opponents ... . "Police informers and other profession- als in the noble art of curtailing freedom of thought, speech, organization, and travel the world over are experts in this type of frame-up. They cannot understand this simple truth: that society can only he changed through the efforts of millions, of broad social forces, and that it is ridiculous to attribute to Marxists the wish to 'conspire' and to build socialism without the conscious resolution of the majority of the toilers." The CIA, however, cares nothing for the truth. Its job is to give the most sinister and twisted interpretation to every event in hopes of being able to arrange the victimization of any who struggle for progressive social change. Thus, the CIA's statement in court defending its attacks on the Fourth International argues that "the -Fourth International has taken part in revolutionary violence to overthrow demo- cratic governments such as its admitted role in the Paris riots of May and June 1968 and has supported guerrilla warfare in Latin America against governments -friendly to the United States." They think, perhaps, that the world has forgotten the CIA-engineered coups re- sponsible for the dictatorial regimes in Iran and Chile. The CIA, which tried to fix elections from Italy to Japan, and which trains secret police in the arts of repression and torture from Korea to Brazil-what a supporter of democratic governments! As for the French Trotskyiste, they certainly did take part in the demonstra- tions of May-June 1968. So did 10 million to 12 million other French workers, stu- dents, and peasants. The only violence that took place was the result of police attacks on the demonstrators, and the attempts of- the government to suppress and evade the clearly expressed will of the people. What about the CIA's charge, expressed in the same statement quoted above, that the Fourth International "has supported guerrilla warfare in Latin America against governments friendly to the United States"? Once again, the charge is ironic, coming as it does from an agency that has supported private armies all over the world. As the House Committee on Intelli- gence reported. "A huge arsenal of wea- pons and access to ammunition have been developed by CIA, giving it a capability that exceeds most armies of the world." But what is really at issue is a basic democratic right. When the oppressed and exploited are denied the right to effect peaceful social change, they have the right to take up arms against their oppression. This is a principle that was affirmed in derive "their just powers from the consent of the governed," that they are instituted to secure certain inalienable rights, aiid that "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." 't'his well-known subversive document on the democratic ri,=lit of a people to overthrow their government adds that ,,when a long train of abuses and usurpa- tions ... evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Govern- ment, and to provide new Guards for their future security." Unfortunately, the United States govern- ment today stands on the wrong side of those struggles in which the people of (lie world are attempting to throw off the yoke of oppression. - It is, in fact, the prime supporter of inequality and exploitation around the world. International should be viewed. The Fourth International, the CIA says, "has assisted Communist regimes hostile to the United States in worldwide propaganda campaigns against the United States and its allies." According to the McCarthyite logic of the CIA witch-hunters, the movement against the war in Vietnam and for the right of the Vietnamese people to self- determination was one of these "world- wide propaganda campaigns against the United Slates and its allies." No doubt the CIA considers the world- wide campaigrt?s in defense of political prisoners in Chile, Iran, and South Korea in the same category. After all, these dictatorial regimes are certainly "govern. ments friendly to the United States." The American Troiskyists, howevr have a different view. The SWP and YS,,. refuse to support butchers like Pinochet or the shah of Iran, even if they are "friendly to the United States" government. And, as Patrick Henry declared during the Ameri- can Revolution, "If this be treason, make the most of it." 0 South Korean Poet Jailed for His Writings W-.111111111-P......... 'A' - 4 r'> if j 'd .~'. +t~ J> "sftftta ' Park Dictatorship Sentences Kim Chi Ila, an internationally-known South Korean poet and opponent of the Park dictatorship, was sentenced to seven years in prison December. 31. Presiding Judge Shim [loon Jung found him guilty under the country's notorious anti- Communist laws, claiming that his writ- ings proved that he was aiding and encouraging the North Korean regime. Since 1970, Kim has been arrested four times for his defiant writings, in which he criticized corruption, social inequality, and Park's undemocratic rule. In July 1974, he was sentenced to death by a military tribunal, but international protests forced Park to commute the sentence to life imprisonment. In February 1975, he was released on conditional amnesty. Despite threats to reimprisun him, Kim published a series of articles describing the methods of torture used. by the Korean Central Intelligence Agency (KCIA), tie also denounced the trial of twenty-two alleged members of the outlawed People's Revolutionary party (['RP) as a frame-up. (Eight of the defendants in that case were later executed.) In March 1975, the KCIA rearrested him, charging him with aiding the PRP and being "a Communist who infiltrated the Catholic church." The earlier life sentence was reinstated. In order to "prove" its charges against Kim, the regime produced a written "con- Kim Chi ' Ha Cession" from him claiming that he was a "Communist." But in August 1975 Kim smuggled a 12,000 word "Declaration of Conscience" out of prison denying that he was a Communist and repudiating the "confession." Several students and at least one priest are serving prison terms for distributing the declaration. 17 January 17, 1977 Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0 STAT Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0 Approved For Release 2005/01/13 : CIA-RDP88-01315R000400450002-0