THE MCNAMARA YEARS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01350R000200010007-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 21, 2004
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 8, 1971
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01350R000200010007-6.pdf124.64 KB
Body: 
{/' rr R1 Ru~ 971 A~C~i &-ee- rge Approved For Release 2004/ 0t1 : CIA-RDP88-01350R00020"VQ,07, q 4t, Geot?rye C. Wilson .. BQU~~ ,ton Post, covered i1lcNama- ~~11cNf11If1Rt1. By Henry L. Trewhitt. re's tenure at the Pentagon, Ularper & Ron-. 307 on.. $7.95) lie is also author of a book, Also, through the accident "Bridge of No Return," on of timing, the Pentagon Pa- ' aMeNaniara had overesti- the capture of the U.S.S. pcrs became public property mated the efficacy of U.S. Pueblo. -after Mr. Trewhitt had writ power, and he had grossly As the propeller-driven ten his eminently fair ac- underestimated the will of transport bucked eastward count of McNamara's stew- the enemy. All the military 'through the night and into ardship of the Pentagon. ?erit]cisins of him were incor- ?.the next day, the questioner Those papers would have porated in the remark of .a could not resist asking.Navy buttressed the book. senior commander: 'He gave Secretary John Jr. Chafes But_ that is not .telling, us enough to .deny success ~wliy he had left the coinpar- what is in this book-only to the enemy. He did not i at ve ease of his Pentagon what no doubt will be in the office for the grueling trip he had just completed on next one on the Defense -the West Coast. Secretary who served Pres- "Because," Chafee said idents Kennedy and John- with earnestness, "I get ter- son from 1961 until he was .rified every time I think of , fired with distinction In. ?a smart guy like McNamara 1967--enough distinction to ending up with a half-million stay on the job until the end men on the. ground in Viet- of February, 1968. What is in mam without knowing how the book is a dispassionate they got there. I have to get review of those McNamara out and see things for my-, years-overly dispassionate Iself." ? ? perhaps, since the prose sel- Just how and why a smart dom manages to pull the. guy like former Defense reader inside McNamara, :Secretary Robert . S. Mc-, the man, and let him share., Namara did indeed let that the agony and ecstasy. happen is one of the intrigu- "He was a creature of tow- Ing questions running ering accomplishment and through the post-mortems substantial failure," author 'on the fatal Vietnam policy Trewhitt tells us in typically .of the 1960s-fatal, anyhow, even-handed fashion after ;.for some 50,000 Americans taking its from McNamara 's .who died in battle and vii- reorganization of the Penta- countect ; thousands ., of. gon, through the follies of . Asians, many of them civil: the TFX and finally to his ?i9ns, whom the policy niak- backing away from the Viet ers went to war to save. nam war he helped lead the In hopes of finding the an nation into. About one-third of the swer, many students of the 307-page book is do.: Vietnam war no doubt will voted to the e war. turn to Henry.L. Trewhitt's _ Discussing Vietnam spe 'book, "McNamara." He cifically, Trewhitt writes:, watched the Defense -Secre- "At the end as at the begin- -tart' as a reporter-first for ning, McNamara accepted ,The Baltimore Sun and then the. underlying premise of :Newsweek ;and interviewed. U.S. policy In Southeast :him at length after Mc Asia. Vietnam was an aspect Namara had left the Penta gon. But the reader will not of global rivalry, with free-. ,find the answer In this book dom from externally im posed Communist rule as E-only some more evidence. kMcNarnara himself is no. ? the local objective., It was a ..where directly quoted on place for. the application of 'how and why he went wrong' the latest theories of limited 'on Vietnam. So the defini? war, uniting political, eco- tive explanation must await nonile and military compo- his own report, or perhaps a nents. But as it worked out, B a r b a r a Tuchman-type the undertaking in Vietnam [treatment of his personal unquestionably was a failure ,papers. ti .3 as it a applied uniquely to, giVe us enough to male the enemy stop trying'.' " The book leaves , the reader wondering how lie- Nainara--the man - who made the ? bloody "body count" a yardstick for mili- tary progress In Vietnam would respond to the moral backlash to the war now cracking through the land. To Mylal. To the civilian casualties documented, iron- ically enough, by one of his friends-Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.). We are reminded of McNamara's .past moralizing, like In the Montreal speech, but not of show lie squares' it W11,11 tile results in Vietnam. War demonstrators in the past have posed the question to him by occasionally hurling missiles through the win- dows of the World Bank- the Institution McNamara now heads "What a..splendid time It would' have been," Trewhitt writes in his final line on McNamara, "without Viet- nam." And-with - forgive- ness for such flawed Mc- Namara projects as the TFX and' C-5A -aircraft-it might have been splendid-given his potential contribution to world arms control. As It Is, McNamara must ue crcuiteU with giving-the world a- crash course in the limited political power. of nuclear weapons. His efforts just might keep the world. from killing itself with the same mad ? weapons Mc- Namara lielped bring Into being--the MIRY offense and Audi defense, to name two. "Ills crowning accom- plislinient," Trewhitt'has de- cided after his careful study ~J a c., 4 .?(. 1 {L'l~ [~esr lCr(, yr of. McNamara, "could ''be simply put: he had caused the world, more than just the narrow circle of Ameri- can strategists, to look at nuclear weapons with thought, rather than Instinct or emotion." Approved For Release 2004/10/13 : CIA-RDP88-0135OR000200010007-6