THE BUREAU: MY THIRTY YEARS IN HOOVER'S FBI

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01350R000200610005-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 27, 2004
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 13, 1979
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01350R000200610005-2.pdf205.78 KB
Body: 
sac a t. 2. 7'4 'i k TICLE AA d For Relea~~ff o/b1 ~1~ T~_ _ 9-RDP88-013 The Bureau: My Thirty Years in Hoover's FBI by William C. Sullivan with Bill Brown (Norton; $12.95) The life and career of William Cornelius adapted with such ease to the Ku Klux Sullivan are the stuff of a second-rate Klan, the civil rights movement, antiwar political novel. They contain just the activists, and others who questioned the right balance of ambition, intrigue, American way. skulduggery, irrationality, and But there came a time when Sullivan revenge-with a dash of nobility thrown began to annoy Hoover. As assistant in for good measure. director in charge of the Domestic A simple man of humble New England Intelligence Division, he was too origins, Sullivan left his job with the outspoken-quarreling with some of Internal Revenue Service in Boston to the central elements of the Hoover become an FBI agent in 1941. From the dogma (by suggesting publicly, for start, a whole new world opened to him, example, that the Communist party of and he had some extraordinary adven- the USA was no longer a threat to tures: chasing fugitives around the national security), making trouble in the country, solving heinous crimes and Bureau's executive conference (whose simple ones, investigating suspected ironic official duty was to vote unan- wartime spies in the Midwest, enjoying imously, in the style of an old-fashioned the camaraderie of a group of men communist central committee, to en- whose image vas ever more glamorous. dorse every decision and the opinion of Sullivan, however, was no run-of-the- the director), and challenging some of mill C-man. He was intellectually the FBI's twisted priorities. Hoover curious, and before long he became one chafed over such insubordination, yet of the Bureau's rising experts on the continued to favor Sullivan with choice communist menace; he worked es- assignments. Never was their love/hate pionage, counterintelligence, and inter- relationship better symbolized than in nal security cases, developing a whole the summer of 1970, after their feud had coterie of young admirers and followers already become an open secret inside the .who shared his excitement in that field. Bureau and out, when Hoover named Sullivan stood out from the crowd: a Sullivan to the number-three job in the quick-witted, wiry, fast-talking fellow, FBI; as the replacement for Cartha D. often disheveled and disorganized, he DeLoach (Lyndon Johnson's favorite FBI always looked older than he was. He was agent, Sullivan's leading enemy and a worrier, and he would read books (and rival, and another early Hoover underline and annotate them) while less sycophant whose relationship with the .serious agents went off to bars and director had soured). football games. Even in such a high-ranking job, Like many other FBI men of his Sullivan resisted pacification. He gave generation, Bill Sullivan aspired to speeches that annoyed the director, had succeed the aging patriarch, J. Edgar suspicious liaisons with officials of the Hoover, as director. The primary Nixon administration, and stood up for evidence of this was the frequency and the victims of the director's arbitrary vehemence with which he denied it. personnel policies and disciplinary Denial was essential if one wanted to system. Sullivan cooperated in a White stay in the charmed circle, because to House effort to reinstitute some talk of replacing Hoover was to hint at domestic spying that Hoover, for his mortality and fallibility, two reasons of personal reputation, had problems the director would not admit suspended, and he wrote the director he had. some outrageously insulting letters. For years-even d.ecades-Sullivan Thus provoked, Hoover took the ex- played along, outdoing himself to please traordinary step of forcing Sullivan out Hoover. He developed new ways of of the Bureau by changing the lock on -investigating Communists and other his office door. ''subversives." He designed, honed, and Hoover died seven months Iater, and implemented many of the Bureau's Sullivan was to spend the rest of his own no`Atbd' R4fAbeY0O41O/1 rem of Hoover's D'811P1~0 5-2 programs" (COINTELPRO), and reputa- ~ tion. For a time he h"eM ma~ceerlQro (first with an insurance crime- prevention institute in Connecticut and then with the "Office of National Narcotics Intelligence," a superfluous and somewhat mysterious agency es- tablished briefly by Nixon's Justice Department). He had some strange- and never fully explained-dealings with John Dean and others in the midst of the Watergate cover-up, although he later narrowly averted indictment over his involvement with Nixon's 17 secret wiretaps only by spilling various beans to 'the. special prosecutor's office. But mostly Sullivan passed his post- FBI time at his retirement home in Sugar Hill, New Hampshire, working on his hate-Hoover campaign. An essential tool in that campaign was the supply of documents he had brought with him from the government. During long, rambling sessions with reporters and investigators who came to call on him, he would leap out of his armchair and disappear for a few minutes to forage through his extensive but chaotic files, returning with a choice memorandum or a tattered copy of a juicy letter that demonstrated his point. Sometimes the document would be trotted out on various occasions to make several separate points, and sometimes the yarns and recollections would trail off inconclusively. But Sullivan was an "informed source" extraordinaire, and few people complained about the long journey to see him. When no one had phoned or visited for a while, Sullivan would take the initiative and call one of his favorite leakees-sometimes from the psychiatric unit of a New Hampshire hospital-to put a new twist on an old story. Usually something would get into print or on the air, and that made him happy. If things - came out in a way unfavorable to him, however, Sulli- van's rage knew no bounds; he once threatened to kill me because he was unhappy with the published excerpts of a book I was writing. But ultimately, nobody told things exactly the way Bill Sullivan wanted them told, and so he finally set out to write his memoirs, with the help of a television producer, Bill Brown. In the midst of that project, on November 9, 1977, Sullivan was shot and killed in an early-morning hunting accident near his home-an event that excited the assassination buffs and conspiracy theorists for a while, but bore no fruits for them. Now comes the book, a loosely organized and frustrAt - i l tipogrd as h 004110/13 : CIA-RDP08-01350F tid its that is an almost per ect retlec- tion of Bill Sullivan-the man, the bureaucrat, the raconteur, the ex- aggerator and the teller of not-quite- funny jokes. It is a book in which he posthumously settles a few scores (with DeLoach and other FBI folk) and reveals much about himself: his desire to be known as a "liberal Democrat," his effort to sound and act like one of the boys (the word "damn" appears so often that it begins to stand out), and his naive contention that his motives were always pure.. I Many of Sullivan's tales are trivial and inconsequential, but a few are mis- chievous. There is his own impromptu three-bullet-but-one-assassin version of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, for example, in which he departs totally from the story (and, presumably, the evidence) that the FBI has stood by for more than 15 years. Perhaps the most useful part of the 11 book is Sullivan's chapter on espionage, where he offers some ? startling revelations about Soviet and American penetration of each other's intelligence networks. His suggestion that there was for many years an undetected Soviet mole inside the New York field office of the FBI is, of course, a troubling one. So is his triumphant story of what hap- pened when Bureau agents captured a US Navy enlisted man named Cornelius Drummond who was passing secrets to the Russians: "Drummond didn't offer any resistance at all, but the boys gave him and the other Soviet agents a beating just for good measure." So much for William Sullivan, the latter- 000200610005-2 day civil libertarian. Finally, it is difficult to know how many stories in Sullivan's book can be trusted. In one, for example, he has Lyndon Johnson ordering the FBI to get involved in the investigation of Edward M. Kennedy's 1969 accident at Chap- paquiddick. (Richard Nixon was presi- dent at the time, of course, and LBJ was back on his ranch.) But with all. of its (and his) failings, Sullivan's book is important for two reasons. One is the further evidence it offers of the astonishing paranoia and infighting that prevailed in the highest ranks of the FBI for many decades. Listen to Sullivan on the subject of the discovery of secret FBI wiretap logs in the White House in 1973: The existence of the logs never would have been known to the press if it hadn't been for some of my old enemies at the FBI. They thought by leaking the story of my involvement with the logs to the press ... that they could block me from consideration for the job I wanted: a special 'reorganization consultant' to the FBI which would have resulted in their dismissal. The second reason is something it does not do: explain why no one an the inside ever blew the whistle on J. Edgar Hoover, one of the great tyrants and frauds of American history. If Sullivan had, then he might have become the hero he wanted us to believe he was. Sanford J. Ungar Sanford J. Ungar, managing editor of Foreign Policy magazine, is the author of FBI: An Uncensored Look Behind the Walls (Atlantic-Little, Brown).