$250,000 U.S.I.A. FILM ON VIETNAM, 3 YEARS IN MAKING, BEING SHELVED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88-01365R000300250017-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 26, 2006
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 10, 1971
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88-01365R000300250017-2.pdf116.14 KB
Body: 
f`tf1 Approved For Release i6'6'~'2~~ '6~IPt-RDP88-01365R000 10 JUN 1071 $250,000 U` ? oc ?f- :? F -j-7 A/~C VC By TAI) SZULC Special to Tile Ncw York Thaw WASHINGTON, June 9 After three years of work and an outlay, of nearly $250,000, the United States Information Agency is letting a major prop- aganda film on the Vietnam war slip into oblivion. Agency officials said today that no formal decision had /'been made to shelve the hour- long film - "Victnatn,Viet- nam!" --- But authoritative sources in the agency indicated that jt would "definitely" not be offered for television or theater showings to foreign audiences. "It's a dead cluck and it will stay in the can," a source in tiic agency said in response to inquiries. whether the film, di- rected by John Ford and now virtually completed, would ever be released. It was reliably reported that the head of the agency, Frank J. Shakespeare Jr., had con- cluded that. the changing mili- tary and political situation in Vietnam, as well as domestic political considerations, now raised doubts on the film's value as convincing ' and prodc?ctive propaganda. Will `Fade Away' In the absence of a decision by Mr. Shakespeare that the film should be distributed, tho sources - said, "Vietnam, Viet- nam!" will simply be allowed to "fade away." Only a few months ago, the agency's motion picture and television division sent out cir- culars to posts abroad saying that the- film would soon be available for distribution to for- eign television networks and stations or for cinema show- ,~,t The agency has refused. tory military operations in Vietnam, show the filth to newsmen pending completion and a de- cision by Mr. Shakespeare to authorize its distribution,. abroad. But it was understood that "Vietnam, Vietnam!" sought to portray the United States Government's side inthe war controversy. But, one official conimented, The act of Congress that set' "Tile fill", as edited, tends to tip tile U.S.T.A. specifically ? show the war critics in an un- barred domestic presentation favorable light." of the agency's films. The only In producing the film, Mr. exception was the permission - granted by Congress to allow distribution of the picture on the life of president Kennedy, produced after his assassi- ilation. Approved For Release 2006/07/27: CIA-RDP88-01365R000300250017-2 Ford repeatedly' visited _ Viet- nam with camera crews. -fie also had access to some filar shot by commercial networks.; Despite lent thy production work, involving frequent changes in the shootin, script to conform to the -changing political situation, and numer- ous retakes, the agency does not believe that the cost of the Vietnam film was exces- sive. They notedthat the film on the moon flight of Apollo 11, which got huge worldwide ex- posure, . cost $212,000. Mr. Ilerschensohn's Kennedy film cost $122,000, and the U.S.T.A. still regards it as its most 'suc- cessful effort in this field. Mr. I-Ierschensohn is known Trankk J. Slakespeare Jr. nam is necessary to counter- reportedly has decided balance what he regards as the not to distribute the in. "one-sided" approach to the war in films produced by its opponents. Begun Under Johnson He is also known to believe The Kennedy filril was pro- that even if the film is not re- leased in the immediate future, duce.d by Bruce lferschensolin, it will be a valuable contri- then a freegenc assistantbutioti to scholars "in 1981 or Now the a agency''s s assistant l director for motion pictures 1999" and those "`.rho are not a.nd television, Mr. Ilersclien-Yet born." sohn began producing the Viet- nam picture during, the last year of the Johnson Ad- ministration. An agency ' official said ,that the production of the film was continued under the Nixon Administration "out of `slicer bureaucratic momentum," although doubts had been arising in the agency. . The one-hour file 'reduced from footage of six-and.a-half hours was said to show the United States military as- sistance to the South Viet- namese armed forces, American alai eLLu,?y .. It reportedly includes North Vietnamese film on the war, obtained. in Tokyo last year, and public debates in the L` n itecl States between antiwar ? spokesmen and advocates oft