ATTACHED NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88G01117R000200460002-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 3, 2011
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 2, 1986
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88G01117R000200460002-7.pdf119.13 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/03: CIA-RDP88GO1117R000200460002-7 86. 2425 NOTE TO: Deputy Director for Intelligence Director of Congressional Affairs FROM: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence 1. This is the article that Secretary Weinberger raised at Friday's breakfast. I think on too many occasions we respond to questions from the Hill in total ignorance of the fact we may be tiptoeing through a mine field where there are grave policy disputes and issues at stake to which we are totally oblivious. Accordingly, when we answer a straight forward question, we inadvertently, like a dim-witted dinosaur, set off explosions all over town. 2. Surely, there must be some way when we get Congressional inquiries of this sort, that we can check around and find out a little background from the policy agencies to see if we are being set up -- that is, in our innocence and ignorance being used. If we found that the issue involved is indeed controversial, either within the Executive Branch or between the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch, we could still go ahead and prepare an intelligence assessment but consult with the policy agency both to forewarn them and perhaps, through consultation, minimize t he damage without sacrificing our objectivity. F- I Let me know your views. Robert Gates Attachment: N.Y. Times, 29May86 Article (CIA Disputes White House on Soviet Antimissile Gains) Distribution: 1 - DDI 1 - D/OCA 1 D/Exec-Staff 1 - D rono 1 - ER CON,MNTIAL Cl By Signer Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/03: CIA-RDP88GO1117R000200460002-7 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/03: CIA-RDP88GO1117R000200460002-7 ARTICLE AP-7V- NEW YORK TIMES ONMGE 29 May 1986 C.I.A. Disputes White House On Soviet Antimissile Gai 4 WIU.W,_.1. BROAD The X-ray device, writes has be ns en under development to the united States for six years, focuses the ow f -~ w ev ince ere. reat Se" Union's X-ray laser research is not so .ca of thrat, mAatlo~n, hem is clessic rayed it earlier this year ro bad Mr. a P Markey said a statement. Markey B The Department of Energy, respond- "The . Energy has exa en~Departmenc per capabilities Si to soviet X-r justify its budg test ban treaty the iepr t Union. request for the k+ra " U.S. X-ray laser pr reported recently that it did "suspect.. This the wants to Spend more than' inistre liti that the Russians were "subatanually ahead" of the United States in such re- 'b. nearly double la search laa~nd might be able to deploy sr. ksarke Year's budga. who is chairman of and sX-ray"With no ~tio sal t~estinng." expl he department I@ manufacture of the for nationde. Sign 's nucl ear weapons, ra C.I.A. for its an an Soviet X- The stetUs of the Soviet research Is central to debates on the United States' Mss Written as Fit c.~.r,..... continued research on X-ray lasers and A test ban treaty. the other advanced nuclear weapons. w"O ment wrote, "could be very of i Energy Administration officials say the v Soviet ffecctiv American research is intended only to dear-directed . energy a the. Xs-rays deSoviet vice is ~ llmeant r for ut in (NDEW), if the Soviet are well ahead of the Particularly U.S. in NDE President Reagan's Proposed ad- technologi s." which they valr-Od ress is "nonnil u lear defense 'Pat this to be the can, bu say the Administration wants the we cannot know for sure " it continued , nuclear de- If the Soviets are su vice for Its antimissile system and that bstantially ahead the Russians, who have stopped tbOY might be able to achieve the capa nu- b14, to deploy testing, are at a standstill in such loy nucleardlrecte research. e rT weak with no additional test The Soviet leader, Mikhail S. Gorba- Ire C.I.A. chev, announced a unilateral Soviet re+~P to Mr moratorium on nuclear testing last Au- AeY W_- Bust. He recently said the moratorium 1vid D. Rtes s r tion ~ Ma 23 was written will be extended until Au nkirs gust a tin hope that the United States would join rector en o in a Permanent ban. The Administra- r. has rejected all such Soviet offers e does not believe that the and said repeatedly that the United et nuon can nut ear ven States will continue its testing. -wed CMr' R'MDna wi can. er o an eXPIOC114 hydrogen bomb p radiat;on that In theory can destrooyy ~y~~ Pspace.iIt is the pro- l of devices that the proposed Lion calls 'nuclear.driven directed ons. American scientists hivve esti- mated that to perfect such devices might require dozen., or even hun- dredo, of nuclear tests. lu se in of ay et o-nn o st v e s W t . , - d - tt) .t u lna adds .1 ? ?? it ueu said. adding that '.r pIelevant classified data is available should you desire a briefing .99 ~ l We Soviet Union declared its moratorium Aug. A, the vfts" of the atomi b c ombingf Hi oro- si 00unced 11 underground dma, the United States has . an- nuclear tau according to Chris es t, a ap' oke& man at the Nevada Tart Site, opera ted by the Energy Department. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/05/03: CIA-RDP88G01117R000200460002-7