DRAFT STUDY - ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SELECTION PROCEDURES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 27, 2008
• Sequence Number: 27
• Publication Date: January 15, 1982
• Content Type: MEMO

Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Draft Study - Architect-Engineer Selection Procedures
FROM:
EXTENSION
NO.
OL 1 5391a
Chief, Procurement Division, OL
3F-03
DATE 15 JAN 1982
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
DATE
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
1.
D/L
2.
Building Planning S t a
4E50 H s
f f
4_~;
c
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
FORM 61 0 USE PREVIOUS
I-79 EDITIONS
STAT
STAT
STAT
SIAI
STAT
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
et.t~ rC, 4ttR ^byn 02 '1
.::. a.3!?U liilJ 4At eJLU 1.':-y1
15 JA IV 1982
FROM:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Building Planning Staff, OL
Director of Logistics
Chief, Procurement Division, OL
Draft Study - Architect-Engineer
Selection Procedures
Memo for D/L from C/BPS/OL dated
31 December 1981, Subject same
(OL 1 5391)
1. We have reviewed the referent as you requested and
have the following comments:
a. Will the Procurement Division be responsible
for the issuance of the solicitation and source
selection process? If so, we believe that a repre-
sentative from the Procurement Division should be
on the Evaluation Board.
b. We do not concur with the recommendation
that the Commerce Business Daily be used to publicize
the proposed procurement. We have stated in several
memoranda to OMB, OFPP, and the Congress that this
procedure is contrary to Agency policy. While we
recognize the importance of the project in terms of
size, cost, and publicity, we do not believe that
these factors warrant changing or deviating from
a policy which has never been challenged in the past.
What we need to do is solicit a reasonable number of
A&E firms to submit qualification data to ensure
that we obtain competition to the maximum practicable
extent within the framework of our normal procurement
procedures.
STAT
STAT
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
p~..9 z .nom 66, T. -a t
- ii l~lCdil v io G+ iii~~ ~rtiir ?:..9
c. With regard to the selection criteria, the
Defense Acquisition Regulation (DAR) precludes
giving potential offerors the actual weights to
be used in the evaluation process whereas it is
optional under the Federal Procurement Regulations
(FPR). We follow the DAR and recommend that the
criteria and sub-criteria be placed in decending
order of importance in the solicitation.
2. Please let us know if we can be of further
assistance.
STAT
tytzti~o ~~;~iaSru ~fc,s:
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
Draft Study - Architect-Engineer Selection Procedures
Building Planning Staff, OL
4E50 Hqs
TO: (Officer designation, 'room number, and
building)
1. C/PD/OL
6. OL/BPS
4E50 HQS
10.
FORM
1-79
610
USE PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
4 JAN 1982
TAT
TAT
OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
The attached draft study
has been sent to the Director
of Logistics for his review
and comment. BPS would appreci-
ate your review also.
Please return with your
comments by 15-J Lry 1982.
OL 1 5 391 .,
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8