DRAFT STUDY - ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SELECTION PROCEDURES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 27, 2008
Sequence Number: 
27
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 15, 1982
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8.pdf143.67 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional) Draft Study - Architect-Engineer Selection Procedures FROM: EXTENSION NO. OL 1 5391a Chief, Procurement Division, OL 3F-03 DATE 15 JAN 1982 TO: (Officer designation, room number, and building) DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom RECEIVED FORWARDED INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) 1. D/L 2. Building Planning S t a 4E50 H s f f 4_~; c 3 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. FORM 61 0 USE PREVIOUS I-79 EDITIONS STAT STAT STAT SIAI STAT Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 et.t~ rC, 4ttR ^byn 02 '1 .::. a.3!?U liilJ 4At eJLU 1.':-y1 15 JA IV 1982 FROM: SUBJECT: REFERENCE: Building Planning Staff, OL Director of Logistics Chief, Procurement Division, OL Draft Study - Architect-Engineer Selection Procedures Memo for D/L from C/BPS/OL dated 31 December 1981, Subject same (OL 1 5391) 1. We have reviewed the referent as you requested and have the following comments: a. Will the Procurement Division be responsible for the issuance of the solicitation and source selection process? If so, we believe that a repre- sentative from the Procurement Division should be on the Evaluation Board. b. We do not concur with the recommendation that the Commerce Business Daily be used to publicize the proposed procurement. We have stated in several memoranda to OMB, OFPP, and the Congress that this procedure is contrary to Agency policy. While we recognize the importance of the project in terms of size, cost, and publicity, we do not believe that these factors warrant changing or deviating from a policy which has never been challenged in the past. What we need to do is solicit a reasonable number of A&E firms to submit qualification data to ensure that we obtain competition to the maximum practicable extent within the framework of our normal procurement procedures. STAT STAT Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 p~..9 z .nom 66, T. -a t - ii l~lCdil v io G+ iii~~ ~rtiir ?:..9 c. With regard to the selection criteria, the Defense Acquisition Regulation (DAR) precludes giving potential offerors the actual weights to be used in the evaluation process whereas it is optional under the Federal Procurement Regulations (FPR). We follow the DAR and recommend that the criteria and sub-criteria be placed in decending order of importance in the solicitation. 2. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance. STAT tytzti~o ~~;~iaSru ~fc,s: Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET Draft Study - Architect-Engineer Selection Procedures Building Planning Staff, OL 4E50 Hqs TO: (Officer designation, 'room number, and building) 1. C/PD/OL 6. OL/BPS 4E50 HQS 10. FORM 1-79 610 USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS 4 JAN 1982 TAT TAT OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) The attached draft study has been sent to the Director of Logistics for his review and comment. BPS would appreci- ate your review also. Please return with your comments by 15-J Lry 1982. OL 1 5 391 ., Approved For Release 2008/06/27: CIA-RDP89-00244R000200260027-8