(UNTITLED)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP89B00551R000600110006-7
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 27, 2000
Sequence Number:
6
Case Number:
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 100.71 KB |
Body:
R89B00551 R000600110006-7
MISSION 1013
.
NOTE: Final plot, solid line, shows coverage obtained by Cameras 1. 2, 30
almd S. Film incorrectly labeled (1011 entered in clock center and on counter).
EMARKS:
Camera No. 2:
1. Negatives thin.
2. Clock readable, but inoperative.
3. Dark streaks.
4. Counter not readable.
5. Gray spots on film.
Camera No. 3:
1. Thin negatives.
2. Counter and clock not readable.
3. Dark streaks and scratches.
4. Gray spots on film.
Camera No. 4:
1. Thin negatives.
2. Counter and clock not readable.
Dark streaks and scratches.
4. Gray spots on film.
Camera No. 1:
1. Dark streaks and scratches.
2. Clock tight on almost entire run causing white streak over entire frame.
Level bubble stuck during turn from Nashville.
4. Quality - good.
5. Numerous white streaks of tight (over exposure) in line of flight.
Camera No. 5:
1. Clock and counter underexposed.
Poor metering.
3. Quality or
4. Negatives thin and flat.
5. Static electricity near end of frame opposite clock.
6. occasional holes and scratches.
7. Streaks line of flight.
Appr4Yed 5 Reiaae%kS0M)6l* 1I: ti#MWFJ1% 551 R000600110006-7
roved For ReIgse'2000/05/31 : CIA-RDP89B00 '1R 008600111300
MLS$ION 1006
Ss Final plot, solid tine, skews track as obtained by cameras 2, 3. 4, and S.
(These was no camera 1 coverage for this Might. )
Print received for all coverage for 2, 3, 4, and S cameras, quality poor.
Counter was net readable on Most ..the negatives and an gone of the prints.
marks;
Camera No. 2
1. Splices no good (used only for leaders).
3. Occasional pinholes throughout.
Counter not working.
4. Negative very flat, and poor contract, not always due to base;
S. Prints, in most crier, did net reproduce detail present on negative.
Clock operated satisfactorily.
' era No. 3
1. Splices unsatisfactory (did not hold).
2. Occasional pinholes and scratches.
3. Counter not working.
4, Quality good.
S. Clock operated satisfactorily.
7. Fiducial marks reversed.
Camera No. 4
1. Splices unsatisfactory.
Prints, in most cases, did not reproduce detail present on negatives.
Counter and clock not working.
3, Occasional pinholes throughout.
4. Negative very flat, and poor contrast,' not always due to haze.
S. Print in most cases. did not reproduce detail present on negative.
Camera No. S
1. Only used in vertical position,
2. Clock and counter not printing well.
3, Low contrast.
Slaa+treakl and pinked:.