(Classified) (MISSION 1115)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP89B00551R000600290001-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 28, 2000
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 14, 1956
Content Type: 
DISP
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP89B00551R000600290001-3.pdf150.84 KB
Body: 
~ Ap~hroved For Release 2000/05/31 :CIA-RDP89B005518000600290001-~ DISPATCH NO. EZZA-?.~r9 K V ~i VSL~AI~~ TO Headquarters 25X1 A '~ Z' v FROM ~QriF~t!EMT R0. / ~ ~ 7 r \. eca cn cry Chief of Station, - ~o cHa~~~ 4r+ cu-ss. ^ G' ---~ GENERAL O DES~A5S6FIE~ -~ SUBJECT ~ orations cuss. CwahoED Tee Ts ~ cam., uz 25X1 A L SPECIFIC Mission lllj ~`~~T R~EIIPEYY DATE1 ~'~' ~ ~ ?~ k6TH: HR 70.2 W 1tTE; ~~~ - $'? REYIEWEHa_,. ~ ~ C 3 ~$ 25X1 A LJ/~ I /" ~ ~ ~ Mission 1115 was flo obey 9 956 Special equipment consisted of Duration of ;he igz was five hours and thirty--four minutes. Take-off was as scheduled. TJo prob- lems were encountered 3n launching the mission. 2. L-$ HS 731, shutter tension spring broke after thirty-four exposures, Preliminary reports from local group indicate that SI-7 and R-6 were excellent through-out. L-8 was excellent for the first thirty-four exposures. There is no indication of fogging or frosting. This is the fourth broken spring that has occurred and each break has been at the same relative position on the spring, directly below the hook on the first coil of the spring. Further, the design of each break has been identical, i. e., an "L" shaped break. The first theory was a double wind on the spring caused by the improper functioning of the latch. This I disagree with, as it would indicate such on the exposure. Aiy theory is that when the spring is manufactured, heat is applied to form the hook, and in re-tempering the spring the part directly below the hook does not get the proper treatment, resulting in weakness ixi this area, Magnafluxing the spring has proven unsatisfactory. Instead each spring is periodically examined under a microscope; although this method is not a positive fix, it is a precau.~ion and has resulted in the discovery of one of the four defective springs. Conclusion: Recommend this theory be further investigated at the plant and that a more stringent test or inspection be initiated to ascertain that each spring meets the specifications. 3, Ido problems were encountered in the briefing or de-briefing of this mission. !~, The route was clear for the entire route south of the Alps. On both the outgoing and incoming legs light low clouds were encountered dust north of the Alps gradually increasing to an overcast condition as it approached .~Jies- baden. The pilot was on course throughout the flight. From the viewpoint of maintaining the planned course line, this was probably the most successful flight flown to date. The quality of the tracker film was generally good, although the ~; CLASSIFICATION ~pyp~p~d~8~r Release 2 1 RtSt9 g_~p~opies; MAR 1949 ~~-Lf^ ~ Q ~= ,2,, Approved For Release 2000/05/31 :CIA-RDP89B00551 R00~~2,9(~~~61-3 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A T~S~CRET -.l/~9 Page 2 of 2 last fifty feet were badly obscured with 'sun streaks'. This was due to the ex~?eme low angle of the sun at the close of the flight. Plotting time for this mission was one hour and fifty minutes. 5. Peferenc All in~3.eate was cleared and urgency existed to accomplish mission on 25X1A 12 Octob fore I feel _51"/1 wa.s unnecessary criticism, Project Headquarters commo has bean reluctant to use patch under similar conditions. However, in future subject messages will be dispatched Operational Immediate through eommo patch. Again I must point out the original notification was not received under the times specified in Operations Order 1~-56. This must ~ed to if we are to comply with all existing directives in dispatching 25X1 A messages. 25X1 A ~'? ~ is to be highly commer3ded for this mission.. Hi~~~~ take-off (`~~ Th g t ''~'e~ . in e y and was an instrument take-off with one half mile visibili landing was a standard GCA approach with one half to three fourths mil e visi- 25X1A bi]'3ty and 300 foot ceiling. visibility conditions and had 25X1 A was dire~tec? to land at 25X1 A ' to pracee.8 to ~1 in this event. ~. was the only alternate with better of been able to land ~t ~ he 25X1 A d crew and equipment was s an 3.n.g by 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A '!. It is recommenaea tinati tine uperaLions vraer ~-7n ana a.~i vperatizons Policy letters be reviewed by Project Headquarters and revised to better direct the operations of the field units. This is particularity true after has completed their move t o icy otter number 19 should be responsibilities of after ~ has m the same review to Specifically: Operations to delineate the proced~~7.d 7FX1 A Operations Policy letter numbed requires ility and procedures for the Flint Tapes. This is especially true now that USAF'E is getting copies of both the f31m and the tapes; Operations Policy letter 11~ should be modified where applicable. 25X1A DISTRIBUTION: Orig - Addressee Approved For Release 200q .i's~~f~~DP89B0055