'ADVISORS' FOR INTERVIEWEES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP89B00552R000100100054-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 21, 2004
Sequence Number: 
54
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 28, 1975
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP89B00552R000100100054-9.pdf27.43 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/11/03 : CIA-RDP89B00552R00D100100054-9 .ySG ,rNr~invrtwS Review Staff: 75/2744 28 August 1975 1. HSC Staffer Rushford was concerned that OCI interviewees were being "advised" by Deputy Director OCI. He said that some of them "did not care" whether they had an advisor, and he interpreted this to mean no advisor need be present. 2. To clarify this, I said that interviewees would answer "yes" or "no" to the question of whether they wanted an advisor present. "I don't care" would be considered a "no" answer. However, since the OCI interviewees didn't know that interpretation, they would be informed and re-asked. 3. I confirmed this procedure with Jack Boos, and he passed the word to Rushford. I then advised If any interviewee does not want an "advisor" present, of course, the advisor should gracefully withdraw. STATINTL cc: SC/DCI Task Force Members Approved For Release 2004/11/03 : CIA-RDP89B00552R000100100054-9