'ADVISORS' FOR INTERVIEWEES
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP89B00552R000100100054-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
September 21, 2004
Sequence Number:
54
Case Number:
Publication Date:
August 28, 1975
Content Type:
MFR
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP89B00552R000100100054-9.pdf | 27.43 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2004/11/03 : CIA-RDP89B00552R00D100100054-9
.ySG ,rNr~invrtwS
Review Staff: 75/2744
28 August 1975
1. HSC Staffer Rushford was concerned that OCI
interviewees were being "advised" by Deputy Director
OCI. He said that some of them "did not
care" whether they had an advisor, and he interpreted
this to mean no advisor need be present.
2. To clarify this, I said that interviewees
would answer "yes" or "no" to the question of whether
they wanted an advisor present. "I don't care" would
be considered a "no" answer. However, since the OCI
interviewees didn't know that interpretation, they
would be informed and re-asked.
3. I confirmed this procedure with Jack Boos,
and he passed the word to Rushford. I then advised
If any interviewee does not want
an "advisor" present, of course, the advisor should
gracefully withdraw.
STATINTL
cc: SC/DCI
Task Force Members
Approved For Release 2004/11/03 : CIA-RDP89B00552R000100100054-9