CONVERSATION WITH B(Sanitized) USAF D/NRO STAFF REGARDING ADDITIONAL JOINT PROCUREMENT OF U-2 AIRCRAFT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP89B00980R000600040023-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 8, 2005
Sequence Number: 
23
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 12, 1965
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP89B00980R000600040023-0.pdf159.43 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2005.1T3 .;k;tA R 89B00980R0006000400 12 July 1965 Copy SUBJECT: Conversation withi USAF, D/NRO Staff, regarding Additional Joint Procurement of U-2 Aircraft REFERENCE: Memorandum from D/NRO tol Col. Geary, dated 7 July 1965, u sect: Future Needs for U-2 Aircraft 1. Having read the reference fromi with confusion and concern, and having discussed my misgivings with Col. Geary, I called to see if he could shed some light on exactly what was required by the D/NRO and to see if additional time could not be purchased in completing the reply. I asked for a change in the two deadlines in the reference from 20 July and 1 August to 6 and 20 August. I also conveyed to my feeling that the paper was remarkably unclear and cluttered with a good deal of peculiar language on cost effectiveness. 2. disclaimed authorship of the reference and said that he would seek clarification on it from I He further added that he would propose the alternate dates which I have noted above. Later in the day he called me back to tell me that he had conferred with I land hadtold the latter of our stated feeling that information in the detail requested could not be obtained in such a short time. 3. What emerged then from his talk with the D/NRO was a require- ment for certain basic information which eeded by 1 August with the understanding that whatever additional information was required over the basic amount could be forthcoming in the weeks that followed that time. Apparently the 1 August deadline represented an extension granted by the Secretary of Defense to that time for the supplemental fund requirement that would be necessary to support in FY66 the initiation of an additional procurement of U-2's. Approved For Release 2005/1z1z3 : CA [ 89B00980R0006 Approved For Release 2005/1 ': s4gRQP f 9B0098OR000600040023-0 Page 2 There may also be the implication that) (wished to clear this matter up before his retirement from the Undersecretary's job in September. The basis identified by lunder the 25X1 1 August deadline were as follows: a. How many new U-2 aircraft would be procured to meet joint SAC and CIA requirements in the foreseeable future, i. e. the calendar period through FY71. Included in this compilation for planning purposes should be those aircraft which might be required by NASA( I at present a total b. Having agreed on a number for total production, at what kind of pace should they be produced that is both technically defensible and economically acceptable. c. What would the price be of the total procurement of aircraft and engines. The question of subsystems such as cameras and ELINT equipment was not discussed but undoubtedly will have to be before a final dollar figure can be firmed up. However, it could be assumed that if production is slow enough on the aircraft and engines, such needs for the time being might well be met from existing supplies of cameras and ELINT systems in the hands of SAC or ourselves. This point needs further clarification. d. What cost phasing would be adopted for the U-2L procure- ment by years. Special reference apparently needs to be paid to keeping FY66 costs as low as possible and on an expenditure basis in order to minimize the impact of the unprogrammed amount. In response to my questions used the tentative figure o as what he thought might be a palatable FY66 figure on an expenditure basis. He asked, of course, that he not be officially held to such a figure. e. Following the achievement of an operational status for U-2L's, what are the projected costs for each year on a conservative basis for operation and maintenance of the combined fleet. This is Approved For Release 2005/116 : C1A-RDP$9B0098OR000600040023-0 Approved For Release 2005/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B0098OR000600040023-0 Page 3 a difficult question to answer in view of the basically different philosophies between SAC and ourselves on not only sortie rates but maintenance structure wherein SAC uses largely military maintenance and we use contractor maintenance throughout. 4. The morning of 12 July I was in touch wit first and then Col. Geary on this subject, but between the two telephone calls I also talked to Kelly Johnson. Kelly, Col. Geary and General Ledford plan to meet in Washington 20 July on the general topic of U-2L procurement. I proposed to Kelly what I had discussed with namely forming a joint task group and going out to Burbank to sit down with he and I n these questions but Kelly expressed a preference for doing his homework on the five principal questions alone before coming in on 20 July at which time he said he would bring I Iwith him. Col. Geary and I agreed that there needed to be joint consultation between his office and ours on this subject in advance of Kelly's visit, accordingly it was agreed that we would try to get together the morning of 14 July at 0900 in this office. The meeting would be composed of himself, 1-7 enera edford, ec , and myself. Col. Geary made a special plea for a manageable meeting in terms of size. Kelly Johnson spoke of certain break-throughs which he felt now lay close to grasp and which he would discuss when he came in. I suspect from what he said that these deal with a completely redesigned wing using the NASA theory of camber since he said that the fuselage of his latest proposal would be the same as the original U-ZL and the power plant would be ditto. I agreed to send Kelly a wire on the subject confirming our telecon and outlining the basic points which made with me on the phone on 9 July. Deputy Assistant Di e t r (Special Activities) 25X1 25X1 IDEALIST Approved For Release 2005/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B00980R00 600040023-0 Approved For Release 2005/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B00980R000600040023-0 Page 4 - DAD/OSA - EXO/DDS&T -D/TECH - D/FA - PS/OSA - SD / OSA - SS / OSA - MD / OSA - Chrono 10 - RB/OSA DAD/OSA/JACunningham/mcm(12 July 65) Approved For Release 2005/12/23 : CIA-RDP89B00980R000600040023-0