(SANITIZED) OPTIONS LIST
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 19, 2011
Sequence Number:
5
Case Number:
Content Type:
MISC
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 68.37 KB |
Body:
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19 :CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
~
~}_:
~t
SUBJECT: (Optionol) ~ r ~~ ~'
?~!~~~
FROM:
E%TENSION
NO.
DATE
31 July 1987
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to show from whom
RECEIVED
_~
FORWARDED
INITIALS
b whom. Oraw a line across column oFFer each comment.)
1.
~~''~,
_
g/~
~
ADDA `~~
~; ;~;!~,
I have advised the Comptroller
2.
and the ExDir that in my opinion
the only two options that are
valid in the attached list are
(1) and (6) .
T
4.
William F. Donnelly
C/MS
5.
6.
7.
8.
,
.
L~
,_
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
A
ST
FORM 61 O usE -REVlous
I_~y EarwNs
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19 :CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19: CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2
STAT
STAT
STAT
~' (1) :Let the CIA go ahead with their studies and
neg~tia~ns for a lease on three new buildings;
~_
(2) Let them go ahead, but say that no lease may be
signed without the approval of the Committee;
(3) The same as option #2, but with additional
conditions (e.g., that the price per square foot be beneath
market value; that management fees rise with the rent instead
of the Consumer Price Index; that the purchase option be the
same year as for buildings a & b and/or be at 90% of market
value; etc.).
(4) The same as option #2, but with additional
requirements to at least act as if there were more options
than staying at this site (e.g., have the architectural and
engineering studies include more than one possible site; have
the CIA arrange for a delay in the need to vacate
Reston by 1989).
so as to ease the pressure to move more offices to
(5) The same as option #2, but with the additional
requirement that they have a competitive bidding process for
the new lease and go with the least expensive bidder. And we
could require the use of outside expertise.
(6)' Reject the proposal to move toward the new lease,
anc~ req~re the CIA to come up with a new proposal.
(7) Demand an Inspector General's investigation of the
old lease and/or push for renegotiation of that lease.
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19: CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2