(SANITIZED) OPTIONS LIST

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 19, 2011
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2.pdf68.37 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19 :CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET ~ ~}_: ~t SUBJECT: (Optionol) ~ r ~~ ~' ?~!~~~ FROM: E%TENSION NO. DATE 31 July 1987 OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to show from whom RECEIVED _~ FORWARDED INITIALS b whom. Oraw a line across column oFFer each comment.) 1. ~~''~, _ g/~ ~ ADDA `~~ ~; ;~;!~, I have advised the Comptroller 2. and the ExDir that in my opinion the only two options that are valid in the attached list are (1) and (6) . T 4. William F. Donnelly C/MS 5. 6. 7. 8. , . L~ ,_ 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. A ST FORM 61 O usE -REVlous I_~y EarwNs Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19 :CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19: CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2 STAT STAT STAT ~' (1) :Let the CIA go ahead with their studies and neg~tia~ns for a lease on three new buildings; ~_ (2) Let them go ahead, but say that no lease may be signed without the approval of the Committee; (3) The same as option #2, but with additional conditions (e.g., that the price per square foot be beneath market value; that management fees rise with the rent instead of the Consumer Price Index; that the purchase option be the same year as for buildings a & b and/or be at 90% of market value; etc.). (4) The same as option #2, but with additional requirements to at least act as if there were more options than staying at this site (e.g., have the architectural and engineering studies include more than one possible site; have the CIA arrange for a delay in the need to vacate Reston by 1989). so as to ease the pressure to move more offices to (5) The same as option #2, but with the additional requirement that they have a competitive bidding process for the new lease and go with the least expensive bidder. And we could require the use of outside expertise. (6)' Reject the proposal to move toward the new lease, anc~ req~re the CIA to come up with a new proposal. (7) Demand an Inspector General's investigation of the old lease and/or push for renegotiation of that lease. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/19: CIA-RDP89G00643R000900010005-2