CLOSING ARGUMENTS WAITED IN REWALD TRIAL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00494R001100710181-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 26, 2010
Sequence Number: 
181
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 16, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00494R001100710181-8.pdf140.82 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710181-8 BonoI ulu Stor-6ulleiin 0 to MAW= Closing Arguments Waited in Rewald Trial "'By Charles Memminger Star-Bulletin Writer The Ronald Rewald trial is "all over except for the shouting," as one lawyer put it. Attorneys for both sides have been huddled in their offices since Monday preparing for the "shouting," or closing argu- ments, expected to take up most of today. No more motions will be filed. No more complaints will be lodg- ed with the judge. No more wit- nesses will take the stand. After 11 weeks, everything that either side could do to help its case has been done. Assistant U.S. Attorney John Peyton, a veteran trial lawyer, will give the first part of the government's closing argument. He will be followed by Brian Tamanaha, the young deputy federal public defender who has been the point man in Rewald's defense., Theodore Greenberg, a special attorney from the Justice De- partment who has been involved in a number of trials involving the CIA, will conduct the final part of the government's closing argument. THE GOVERNMENT gets to address the jury twice, the jury will be told, because it has the burden of proving that Rewald is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." Both sides are expected to argue that legal concept at length. The defense case has been framed around creating doubt in the minds of the jurors. Should one juror of the 12per- son panel not be convinced that Rewald is guilty of fraud, per= jury and tax evasion, the case will end in a mistrial. The gov- ernment will then be faced with the costly and time-consuming process of retrial. 'Ironically, none of the 18 pea ?W box have been sitting in the jury box for more than two months know if they are Jurors or alternates. After the g arguments are complete, U.S. Judge Harold Fong will dismiss the six alternate jurors.. The alternates have been known only to the judge and attorneys, to assure that all of the jurors will pay attention during the long trial The unusually large number of alternates was chosen because of I he possibility that one or more urors would be forced, through- llness or other _ problems, to ithdraw. NONE OF the 'jurors, however has been forced to drop out of the trial. In fact, there have been only a few times when trial was delayed because a juror was late getting in the court- room. None of the jurors has even Appeared to have dozed off dur- ing the long trial. That may be g because they have seen a long line of colorful, famous an sometimes mysterious people taking the stand to testify. Jurors watched a number of former CIA agents take the stand and describe -their associa- tion with Rewald. They did not, however, see hard-boiled agents in trenchcoats. They saw one agent, Jack Kindschi, break down in tears as he described how his mother lost her life sav- ings to Rewald. They saw former CIA office chief Jack Rardin get choked up when he described how be was reprimanded for his handling of Rewald. Rardin said it was the only "black spot" on his 3o year CIA record. Ronald Rewald Lawyers ready case for jury THE JURY saw Jack Lord angrily suggest that Rewald had told a "damnable lie" -when he said Lord- had-an office with Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dilling- ham & Wong. But the famous television actor smiled and nod- ded at the jury as he left the stand. The jury saw a string of women take the stand and testi- Tara to Page A-8, Col. I Approved For Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710181-8 Approved For Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710181-8 Wednesday, October 16. 1M Hoeokilu Stw4k&hn A-9 Closing Arguments. Due in 11-Week Rewald Case C*Mud Irm Par On from everybody from from nmr from a National National fy that they received money from Rewald for social or sexual conthet. There was standing ?' room only In the court when blonde model Cynthia Brooks, a Playboy centerfold, stepped into the witness box. She told the jury she had received some money from Rewald, but also lost a good deal of her own when the company collapsed in 19 The jury heard Rewald's for- mer partner, Sunlin Wong, de - scribe how Rewald once asked him to try to bribe a Waikiki gypsy to give a fake spiritual reading to an elderly woman Re- Wald was trying to cultivate as an investor. There was some chuckling in 3 the court when Wong described how he attended the Los An- i..geles "funeral" of J. Randall Dill- Ingham. D' along with Bishop and dwin, did not actually exist. The 36-year-old Wong said he merely walked,the streets of Los Angeles for a day until it was time to return from the "funeral." WONG STILL' Is serving a two- year prison term after pleading guilty to mail and security fraud ors partn runnmeewas f hi i Bld' company. ling when Capt. Ned: Ag~ry took airline pilot and former Rewald judge, argued with defense si to the jury. nhe jury heard testimony Football ue official to Re- wald's bodyguard. The govern- ment Pulied no punches in chos- Mwhkb of the 400 investors lost money it would put on the stand. There was a blind man, a crippled elderly woman and a woman who lost her hus- band and sow In a plane crash. IN CONTRAST to the more than 100 witnesses put on by the government, the defense put on fewer than 10. The jury also did not see the man who was to be the trial's star witness, Rewald himself. At the last minute, Rewald decided not to take the stand. The rea- son, according to his attorneys, was that Judge Fong refused to let Rewald testify about the full range of Rew 's, association with the CIA. The judge ruled months before the trial that the only CIA evidence that could be allowed by the defense would be That showing the CIA actually managed, directed or. controlled investor money or BBED&W. . Sometime this afternoon, after the "shouting" subsides, th jury will begin to weigh all of the evidence it has heard. Thpn, after what is expected to be days of deliberations, the jury will return to the courtroom with its verdict. It is fitting that the courtroom is named Aha Kupono," or "Justice." Approved For Release 2010/07/26: CIA-RDP90-00494RO01100710181-8