MEDICAL COSTS BECOME THORNY ISSUE IN LABOR-MANAGEMENT NEGOTIATIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 27, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9.pdf146.57 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/27: CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9 HEALTH BENEFITS CHANGING Fewer companies are paying 100 percent of covered medical charges; r more are offering plans that require employees to pay deductibles, according to a survey of 240 large firms. 100% PERCENT OF PLANS REQUIRING EMPLOYEES TO PAY FRONT-END DEDUCTIBLE 40 ? OW' 20- 0 PERCENT OF PLANS PAYING ALL CHARGES. RATHER THAN REQUIRING EMPLOYEE TO PAY PART 1982 1983 1984 SOURCE: Hewitt Associates 19.85 19.86 1987 BY TOBEY?THE WASHINGTON POST Medical Costs Become Thorny Issue In Labor-Management Negotiations By Albert B. Crenshaw Washington Post Staff Writer The issue that brought Potomac Electric Power Co. workers to the brink of a strike last week is one that is raising labor-manage- ment tensions throughout corporate Ameri- ca. The question is health care?specifically, who will pay what share of the cost? Medical costs, fueled by new technology, new diseases and other factors, are rising so rapidly that the average company's medical insurance premium has almost doubled in the past five years, according to a study by Hay/Huggins, a Philadelphia-based benefits consulting firm. "And that's just a continuation of a trend that's been going on since the mid-1970s," said Michael Carter, senior vice president of Hay/Huggins. "Companies have been doing all sorts of things to try to control costs and are still finding that they are not successful." As a result, companies, including Pepco, are seeking to shift some of the burden to their employees. Neither Pepco nor Local 1900 of the In- See HEALTH, C7, Col. 5 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/27: CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/27: CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9 ...,..~IgmeryirrIGIM um Effic HEALTH, From C1 percent of of companies have increas the deductible that employees must ternational Brotherhood of ElectKical pay before getting full coverage, 19 Workers would comment on the ten- percent have made hospital costs tative three-year contract reached subject to a deductible, and 15 per- last Friday, but a source familiar cent have increased the coinsurance with the negotiations called medical amount. costs a "predominant issue" in the According to Hay/Huggins, the bargaining, average worker, who had $8 a Pepco had sought to have union month deducted from his paycheck workers begin to pick up a share of for health insurance in 1980, will see the company's medical insurance $40 a month taken out this year?a premium, which heretofore has been 400 percent increase. And these paid entirely by the company. numbers do not include higher de- The question was resolved in 'ductibles and coinsurance payments. last-minute bargaining, though nei- A Hewitt survey of salaried em- ther side would disclose the terms ployees found that in 1982, 43 per- before today's ratification vote by cent of companies required no em- the union members. ployee contribution for medical But by making the demand, Pepco coverage, while last year only 29 placed itself among a growing major- percent did so. ity of companies that believe em- And it found the employee share of costs rising. In 1982, for example, ployees should share more of the costs of their health care. 80 percent of hospitalization plans paid 100 percent of room and board Mark Murray, a partner with the coverage, but last year only a third consulting firm of Hewitt Associates, paid 100 percent. Plans paying 80 said that he sees two forces at work percent jumped from 9 percent in as far as employers are concerned. 1982 to 37 percent last year. The first is "pure cost containment, Hewitt's Murray foresees con- the issue being, 'If medical costs are tinuing pressure along these lines, growing at 15 to 20 percent a year, but with added emphasis on other can we afford to pay that full in- cost-control items such as second crease, or is it appropriate to ask our opinions and precertification for hos- I employees to pay some?'" pital admissions. The second is psychological, Mur- "It's a question of where the corn- ray said. If the employee pays noth- pany wants to spend benefit dollars," ing, he has no incentive to hold down he said. Hewitt's surveys show that costs, and if he does pay something, employees regard medical coverage it appears from Hewitt's surveys to as the most important of their bene- give a greater sense of appreciation fits, but he said "most employees for the benefit, he said. recognize the squeeze when the And the pressure is being felt by company goes at it in a straightfor- white collar and blue collar workers ward manner" and are willing to alike. A Hay/Huggins survey of bear some of the costs so that other hourly compensation showed that 43 benefits can be maintained. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/27: CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/27: CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/08/27: CIA-RDP90-00530R000400730004-9